Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Water distillation modeling by disjoint CNT-based channels under the influence of external electric fields

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using molecular dynamics method, the ion rejection and water flow inside flexible disjoint carbon-based channels were examined in the presence of electric fields. The effects of the carbon nanotube diameters and field magnitude on the nano-channel efficiency were investigated. It was observed that water flow through the filter was modified by increasing the radius of nanotubes, while the salt rejection was reduced. The particles’ behaviors inside the channel were described in view of Van der Waals interactions between the water molecules, ions, and carbon atoms. Furthermore, the results indicated that the ion rejection and water flow were increased under the application of proper magnitude of electric fields.

Using MD simulation method, a disjoint CNT-based filter was designed to produce freshwater from a NaCl solution by the aid of external electric field. It was observed that the filter operation was significantly affected by channel structural parameters and amount of applied electric fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kannam SK, Todd BD, Hansen JS, Daivis PJ (2013) How fast does water flow in carbon nanotubes? J Chem Phys 138:094701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu K, Chen Z, Li J, Li X, Xu J, Dong X (2017) Wettability effect on nanoconfined water flow. PNAS 114:3358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kargar M, Lohrasebi A (2017) Deformation of water nano-droplets on graphene under the influence of constant and alternative electric fields. PhysChemChemPhys 19:26833

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lohrasebi A, Koslowski T (2019) Modeling water purification by an aquaporin-inspired graphene-based nano-channel. J Mol Model 25:280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ang EYM, Ng TY, Yeo J, Lin R, Liu Z, Geethalakshmi KR, Toh W (2020) A review on low dimensional carbon desalination and gas separation membrane designs. J Membr Sci 598:117785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neek-Amal M, Peeters FM, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK (2016) Commensurability effects in viscosity of nanoconfined water. ACS Nano 10(3):3685–3692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen-Tanugi D, Lin LC, Grossman JC (2016) Multilayer nanoporous graphene membranes for water desalination. Nano Lett 16:1027–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kargar M, Khasheii F, Lohrasebi A (2018) Influence of electric fields on the efficiency of multilayer graphene membrane. J Mol Model 24:241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Qiu H, Zeng XC, Guo W (2015) Water in inhomogeneous nanoconfinement: coexistence of multilayered liquid and transition to ice nanoribbons. ACS Nano 9:9877–9884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Joly L, Tocci G, Merabia S, Michaelides A (2016) Strong coupling between nanofluidic transport and interfacial chemistry: how defects reactivity controls liquid–solid friction through hydrogen bonding. J Phys Chem Lett 7(7):1381–1386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chaban V (2010) Filling carbon nanotubes with liquid acetonitrile. Chem Phys Lett 496(1–3):50–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaban V (2010) Should carbon nanotubes be degasified before filling? Chem Phys Lett 500(1–3):35–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaban V, Prezhdo O (2014) Nanoscale carbon greatly enhances mobility of a highly viscous ionic liquid. ACS Nano 8(8):8190–8197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei N, Peng X, Xu Z (2014) Understanding water permeation in graphene oxide membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5877–5883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai H, Xu Z, Yang X (2016) Water permeation and ion rejection in layer-by-layer stacked graphene oxide nanochannels: a molecular dynamics simulation. J Phys Chem C 120:22585–22596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Meng XW, Shen L (2020) Transport between one dimensional disjoint nanochannels. Chem Phys Lett 739:137029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahimi M, Ebrahimi F (2019) Efficient transport between disjoint nanochannels by a water bridge. Phys Rev Lett 122:214506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walther JH, Ritos K, Cruz-Chu ER, Megaridis CM, Koumoutsakos P (2013) Barriers to superfast water transport in carbon nanotube membranes. Nano Lett 13(5):1910–1914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng C, Jiang G, Garvey CJ, Wang Y, Simon GP, Liu JZ, Li D (2016) Ion transport in complex layered graphene-based membranes with tuneable interlayer spacing. Sci Adv 2:e1501272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong S, Constans C, Surmani Martins MV, Seow YC, Guevara Carrió JA, Garaj S (2017) Scalable graphene-based membranes for ionic sieving with ultrahigh charge selectivity. Nano Lett 17:728–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ilie A, Crampin S, Karlsson L, Wilson M (2012) Repair and stabilization in confined nanoscale systems - inorganic nanowires within single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Res 5:833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Choe H, Hong MH, Seo Y, Lee K, Kim G, Cho Y, Ihm J, Jhe W (2005) Formation, manipulation, and elasticity measurement of a nanometric column of water molecules. Phys Rev Lett 95:187801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. An S, Jhe W (2019) Nanopipette/nanorod-combined quartz tuning fork–atomic force microscope. Sensors 19(8):1794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jin C, Suenaga K, Iijima S (2008) Plumbing carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol 3:17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tuart SJ, Tutein AB, Harrison JA (2000) A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J Chem Phys 112:6472–6486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Akbarian D, Yilmaz DE, Cao Y, Ganesh P, Dabo I, Munro J, Ginhoven RV, van Duin ACT (2019) Understanding the influence of defects and surface chemistry on ferroelectric switching: a ReaxFF investigation of BaTiO3. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21(33):18240–18249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akbarian D, Hamedi H, Damirchi B, Yilmaz DE, Penrod K, Hunter Woodward WH, Moore J, Lanagan MT, van Duin ACT (2019) Atomistic-scale insights into the crosslinking of polyethylene induced by peroxides. Polymer 183:121901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. van Duin ACT, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard WA (2001) ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J Phys Chem A 105:9396–9409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Allen M, Tildesley DJ (1987) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Conway BE (1981) Ionic hydration in chemistry and biophysics. Elsevier Science Ltd

  33. Kargar M, Lohrasebi A (2019) Water flow modeling through the graphene-based nanochannel: theory and simulation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 21:3304–3309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lohrasebi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rizi, S.H., Lohrasebi, A. Water distillation modeling by disjoint CNT-based channels under the influence of external electric fields. J Mol Model 26, 236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-020-04492-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-020-04492-4

Keywords

Navigation