Abstract
The reduction thermodynamics of cytochrome c (cytc), determined electrochemically, are found to be sensitive to solvent H/D isotope effects. Reduction of cytochrome c is enthalpically more favored in D2O with respect to H2O, but is disfavored on entropic grounds. This is consistent with a reduction-induced strengthening of the H-bonding network within the hydration sphere of the protein. No significant changes in E°′ occur, since the above variations are compensative. As a main result, this work shows that the oxidation-state-dependent differences in protein solvation, including electrostatics and solvent reorganization effects, play an important role in determining the individual enthalpy and entropy changes of the reduction process. It is conceivable that this is a common thermodynamic feature of all electron transport metalloproteins. The isotope effects turn out to be sensitive to buffer anions which specifically bind to cytc. Evidence is gained that the solvation thermodynamics of both redox forms of cytc are sensibly affected by strongly hydrated anions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cook PF (ed) (1991) Enzyme mechanism from isotope effects. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Hendriks J, Van Stokkum IH, Ellingwerf KJ (2003) Biophys J 84:1180–1191
Toyama A, Takahashi Y, Takeuchi H (2004) Biochemistry 43:4670–4679
Penalver MJ, Rodriguex-Lopez JM, Garcia-Ruiz PA, Garcia-Canovas F, Tudela J (2003) Biochim Biophys Acta 1650:128–135
Scheiner S (2000) Biochim Biophys Acta 1458:28–42
Hirst J, Ackrell BAC, Armstrong FA (1997) J Am Chem Soc 119:7434–7439
Hille R (1991) Biochemistry 30:8522–8529
Farver O, Zhang J, Chi Q, Pecht I, Ulstrup J (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4426–4430
Némethy G, Sheraga HAJ (1964) Chem Phys 41:680–689
Ben-Naim A, Marcus YJ (1984) Chem Phys 81:2016–2027
Marcus Y, Ben-Naim AJ (1985) Chem Phys 83:4744–4759
Scheiner S, Čuma M (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:1511–1521
Muller NJ (1990) Acc Chem Res 23:23–28
Muller NJ (1991) Solution Chem 20:669–680
Graziano GJ (2000) J Phys Chem B 104:9249–9254
Rekharsky MV, Inoue Y (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:12361–12371
Chervenak MC, Toone EJ (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116:10533–10539
Likhodi O, Chalikian TV (2000) J Am Chem Soc 122:7860–7868
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Sola M, Francia F (1997) Biochemistry 36:16247–16258
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Loschi L, Righi F, Sola M (1999) J Am Chem Soc 121:501–506
Battistuzzi G, D’Onofrio M, Borsari M, Sola M, Macedo AJ, Moura JJG, Rodrigues P (2000) J Biol Inorg Chem 5:748–760
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Cowan JA, Sola M (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:5315–5324
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Sola M (2004) J Biol Inorg Chem 9:23–26
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Sola M (1997) Arch Biochem Biophys 339:283–290
Makhatadze GI, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM (1995) Nat Struct Biol 2:852–855
Gopal D, Wilson GS, Earl RA, Cusanovich MA (1988) J Biol Chem 263:11652–11656
Krezel A, Bal W (2004) J Inorg Biochem 98:161–166
Kuwana T (1977) In: Sawyer DT (ed) Electrochemical studies of biological systems. (ACS symposium series, no. 38) American Chemical Society, Washington
Yee EL, Cave RJ, Guyer KL, Tyma PD, Weaver MJ (1979) J Am Chem Soc 101:1131–1137
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Sola M (2001) Eur J Inorg Chem 2989–3004
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Cowan JA, Eicken C, Loschi L, Sola M (1999) Biochemistry 38:5553–5562
Taylor JR (1982) An introduction to error analysis. The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. University Science Books, Sausalito, Calif
Banci L, Bertini I, Huber JG, Spyroulias GA, Turano P (1999) J Biol Inorg Chem 4:21–31
Ikeshoij T, Taniguchi I, Hawkridge FM (1989) J Electroanal Chem 270:297–308
Yuan X, Hawkridge FM, Chlebowski JF (1993) J Electroanal Chem 350:29–42
Christen RP, Nomikos SI, Smith ET (1996) J Biol Inorg Chem 1:515–522
Grunwald E, Steel C (1995) J Am Chem Soc 117:5687–5692
Liu L, Guo Q-X (2001) Chem Rev 101:673–695
Liu L, Yang C, Guo Q-X (2000) Biophys Chem 84:239–251
Finer-Moore JS, Kossiakoff AA, Hurley JH, Earnest T, Stroud R (1992) Proteins 12:203–222
Hildebrandt P, Vanhecke F, Heibel G, Mauk AG (1993) Biochemistry 32:14158–14164
Battistuzzi G, Borsari M, Canters GW, de Waal E, Loschi L, Warmerdam G, Sola M (2001) Biochemistry 40:6707–6712
Weaver MJ, Nettles SM (1980) Inorg Chem 19:1641–1646
Arnett EM, McKelvey DR (1969) In: Coetzee JF, Fitchie CD (eds) Solute–solvent interactions. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 343–397
Ben-Naim A, Wilf J, Yaakobi M (1973) J Phys Chem 77:95–102
Kresheck GC, Schneider H, Scheraga HA (1965) J Phys Chem 69:3132–3144
Lopez M, Makhatadze GI (1998) Biophys J 74:117–125
Scopes RK (1984) Protein purification. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out with the financial support of the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca of Italy (Programmi di Ricerca Scientifica di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale, Cofin 2003), the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena, contributo del 16/4/2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Battistuzzi, G., Borsari, M., Ranieri, A. et al. Solvent-based deuterium isotope effects on the redox thermodynamics of cytochrome c. J Biol Inorg Chem 9, 781–787 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-004-0580-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-004-0580-x