Abstract
Femur stiffness, for example axial and bending stiffness, integrates both geometric and material information of the bone, and thus can be an effective indicator of bone strength and hip fracture risk. Femur stiffness is ideally measured from quantitative computed tomography (QCT), but QCT is not recommended for routine clinical use due to the public concern about exposure to high-dosage radiation. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is currently the primary imaging modality in clinic. However, DXA is two-dimensional and it is not clear whether DXA-estimated stiffness has adequate accuracy to replace its QCT counterpart for clinical application. This study investigated the accuracy of femur stiffness (axial and bending) estimated from CTXA (computed tomography X-ray absorptiometry) and DXA against those directly measured from QCT. Proximal-femur QCT and DXA from 67 subjects were acquired. For each femur, the QCT dataset was projected into CTXA using CTXA-Hip (Mindways Software, Inc., USA). Femur stiffness at the femoral neck and intertrochanter were then calculated from QCT, CTXA and DXA, respectively, and different elasticity-density relationships were considered in the calculation. Pearson correlations between QCT and CTXA/DXA measured stiffness were studied. The results showed that there were strong correlations between QCT and CTXA derived stiffness, although the correlations were affected by the adopted elasticity-density relationship. Correlations between QCT and DXA derived stiffness were much less strong, mainly caused by the inconsistence of femur orientation in QCT projection and in DXA positioning. Our preliminary clinical study showed that femur stiffness had slightly better performance than femur geometry in discrimination of hip fracture cases from controls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boonen S, Autier P, Barette M, Vanderschueren D, Lips P, Haentjens P (2004) Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 15:87–94
Brunner LC, Eshilian-Oates L, Kuo TY (2003) Hip fractures in adults. Am Fam Physician 67:537–543
Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C (2009) Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int 20:1633–1650
Alvarez-Nebreda ML, Jimenez AB, Rodriguez P, Serra JA (2008) Epidemiology of hip fracture in the elderly in Spain. Bone 42:278–285
Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (2009) Incidence and Mortality of Hip Fractures in the United States. J Am Med Assoc 302:1573–1579
Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259
Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, Miller PD, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2005) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 20:185–194
Cranney A, Jamal SA, Tsang JF, Josse GR, Leslie WD (2007) Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women. CMAJ 177:575–580
McClung MR (2005) The relationship between bone mineral density and fracture risk. Curr Osteoporos Rep 3:57–63
Cefalu CA (2004) Is bone mineral density predictive of fracture risk reduction? Curr Med Res Opin 20:341–349
Unnanuntana A, Gladnick BP, Donnelly E, Lane JM (2010) The assessment of fracture risk. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:743–753
Beck TJ (2007) Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 5:49–55
Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WW Jr, Rao GU (1990) Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data: a structural approach. Invest Radiol 25:6–18
Yoshikawa T, Turner CH, Peacock M, Slemenda CW, Weaver CM, Teegarden D, Markwardt P, Burr DB (1994) Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:1053–1064
Mochizuki T, Yano K, Ikari K, Kawakami K, Hiroshima R, Koenuma N, Ishibashi M, Shirahata T (2016) Hip structure analysis by DXA of teriparatide treatment: a 24-month follow-up clinical study. J Orthop 13:414–418
Beck TJ, Looker AC, Ruff CB, Sievanen H, Wahner HW (2000) Structural trends in the aging femoral neck and proximal shaft: analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. J Bone Miner Res 15:2297–2304
Ramamurthi K, Ahmad O, Engelke K, Taylor RH, Zhu K, Gustafsson S, Prince RL, Wilson KE (2012) An in vivo comparison of hip structure analysis (HSA) with measurements obtained by QCT. Osteoporos Int 23:543–551
Mayhew P, Kaptoge S, Loveridge N, Power J, Kroger HP, Parker M, Reeve J (2004) Discrimination between cases of hip fracture and controls is improved by hip structural analysis compared to areal bone mineral density. An ex vivo study of the femoral neck. Bone 34:352–361
Ahlborg HG, Nguyen ND, Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA (2005) Contribution of hip strength indices to hip fracture risk in elderly men and women. J Bone Miner Res 20:1820–1827
Kaptoge S, Beck TJ, Reeve J Stone KL, Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Cummings SR (2008) Prediction of incident hip fracture risk by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 23:1892–1904
Timoshenko S, Goodier JN (1951) Theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New York
Wight JK, MacGregor JG (2012) REINFORCED CONCRETE—mechanics and design. Pearson, London
Hartsuijker C, Welleman JW (2007) Engineering mechanics. Springer, New York
Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, Taddei F, Brynjólfsson S, Viceconti M (2008) Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review. Clin Biomech 23:135–146
Borders S, Petersen KR, Orne D (1977) Prediction of bending strength of long bones from measurements of bending stiffness and bone mineral content. J Biomed Eng 99:40–44
Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Ford CM, Hayes WC (1994) Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J Biomech 27:1137–1146
Yeni YN, Dong XN, Fyhrie DP, Les CM (2004) The dependence between the strength and stiffness of cancellous and cortical bone tissue for tension and compression: extension of a unifying principle. Biomed Mater Eng 14:303–310
Ritchie RO, Koester KJ, Ionova S, Yao W, Lane NE, Ager JW III (2008) Measurement of the toughness of bone: a tutorial with special reference to small animal studies. Bone 43:798–812
Ahmad O, Ramamurthi K, Bouxsein ML, Engelke K, Wilson KE, Taylor RH (2009) Evaluation of 3D structural properties of the proximal femur using multiple 2D DXA images and a statistical atlas. J Clin Densitom 12:111–112
Ohnaru K, Sone T, Tanaka K, Akagi K, Ju Y-I, Choi H-J, Tomomitsu T, Fukunaga M (2013) Hip structural analysis: a comparison of DXA with CT in postmenopausal Japanese women. Springerplus 2:331
Prevrhal S, Shepherd JA, Faulkner KG, Gaither KW, Black DM, Lang TF (2008) Comparison of DXA hip structural analysis with volumetric QCT. J Clin Densitom 12:232–236
Engelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, Qin L, Zysset P, Leslie WD, Shepherd JA, Schousboe JT (2015) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the hip in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2015 ISCD official positions—part I. J Clin Densitom 18:338–358
Adams JE (2013) Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 9:28–42
Lekamwasam S, Lenora RSJ (2003) Effect of leg rotation on hip bone mineral density measurements. J Clin Densitom 6:331–336
Goh JC, Low SL, Bose K (1995) Effect of femoral rotation on bone mineral density measurements with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 57:340–343
Khoo BC, Brown K, Cann C, Zhu K, Henzell S, Low V, Gustafsson S, Price RI, Prince RL (2009) Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and t scores. Osteoporos Int 20:1539–1545
Cann CE, Adams JE, Brown JK, Brett AD (2014) CTXA hip—an extension of classical DXA measurements using quantitative CT. PLoS ONE 9(3):e91904
Li B, Aspden RM (1997) Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis. J Bone Miner Res 12:641–651
Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM (2003) Trabecular bone modulus–density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36:897–904
Dalstra M, Huiskes R, Odgaard A, van Erning L (1993) Mechanical and textural properties of pelvic trabecular bone. J Biomech 26:523–535
Currey JD (1969) The relationship between the stiffness and the mineral content of bone. J Biomech 2:477–480
Currey JD (1969) The mechanical consequences of variation in the mineral content of bone. J Biomech 2:1–11
Barak MM, Currey JD, Weiner S, Shahar R (2009) Are tensile and compressive young’s moduli of compact bone different? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2:51–60
Luo Y (2018) Empirical functions for conversion of femur areal and volumetric bone mineral density. J Biomed Biol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-018-0394-x
Martin RB, Burr DB (1984) Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. J Biomech 17:195–201
Danielson ME, Beck TJ, Karlamangla AS, Greendale GA, Atkinson EJ, Lian Y, Khaled AS, Keaveny TM, Kopperdahl D, Ruppert K, Greenspan S, Vuga M, Cauley JA (2013) A comparison of DXA and CT based methods for estimating the strength of the femoral neck in post-menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24:1379–1388
Knowles NK, Reeves JM, Ferreira LM (2016) Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) derived bone mineral density (BMD) in finite element studies: a review of the literature. J Exp Orthop 3:1–16
Luo Y (2017) Image-based multilevel biomechanical modeling for fall-induced hip fracture. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
The reported research has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Manitoba Health Research Council (MHRC) in Canada, which are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks to Winnipeg Health Science Centre for providing the QCT and DXA images used in this study.
Funding
Funding was provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Grant no: 37098) and Research Manitoba (Grant no: 37807).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The use of medical images in this study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Manitoba, Canada.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors had any personal or financial conflicts of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, Y., Yang, H. Comparison of femur stiffness measured from DXA and QCT for assessment of hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Metab 37, 342–350 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-018-0926-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-018-0926-z