Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Finger tapping and verbal fluency post-tap test improvement in INPH: its value in differential diagnosis and shunt-treatment outcomes prognosis

  • Original Article - EANS Affairs
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) diagnosis is challenging as it can be mimicked by other neurological conditions, such as neurodegenerative dementia and motor syndromes. Additionally, outcomes after lumbar puncture (LP) tap test and shunt treatment may vary due to the lack of a common protocol in INPH assessment. The present study aimed to assess whether a post-LP test amelioration of frontal cognitive dysfunctions, characterizing this syndrome, can differentiate INPH from similar neurological conditions and whether this improvement can predict INPH post–shunt outcomes.

Method

Seventy-one consecutive patients referred for INPH suspicion and LP testing, were enrolled. According to the consensus guidelines criteria, 29 patients were diagnosed as INPH and 42 were assigned an alternative diagnosis (INPH-like group) after reviewing clinical, neuropsychological and imaging data, and before LP results. A comprehensive neuropsychological assessment for frontal executive, upper extremity fine motor functions, aphasias, apraxias, agnosias and gait evaluation were administered at baseline. Executive, fine motor functions and gait were re-examined post-LP test in all patients and post-shunt placement in INPH patients.

Results

Of the INPH patients, 86.2% showed cognitive amelioration in the post-LP test; in addition, all but one (97%) presented with neurocognitive and gait improvement post-shunt. Verbal phonological fluency and finger tapping task post-LP improvement predicted positive clinical outcome post-shunt. None of the INPH-like group presented with neurocognitive improvement post-LP.

Conclusions

Post-LP amelioration of verbal fluency and finger tapping deficits can differentiate INPH from similar disorders and predict positive post-shunt clinical outcome in INPH. This becomes of great importance when gait assessment is difficult to perform in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH (1965) Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal fluid pressure. A treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 273:117–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldo JV, Schwartz S, Wilkins D, Dronkers NF (2006) Role of frontal versus temporal cortex in verbal fluency as revealed by voxel-based lesion symptom mapping. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 12(6):896–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Montero-Odasso M, Fantino B, Herrmann FR, Allali G (2012) Gait control: a specific subdomain of executive function? J Neuroeng Rehabil 9:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Black PM (1980) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Results of shunting in 62 patients. J Neurosurg 52:371–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blomsterwall E, Bilting M, Stephensen H, Wikkelsö C (1995) Gait abnormality is not the only motor disturbance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Scand J Rehabil Med 27:205–209

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohannon R, Andrews A, Thomas M (1996) Walking speed: reference values and correlates for older adults. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 24:86–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “mini-mental state” a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallia GL, Rigamonti D, Williams MA (2006) The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2:375–381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hebb AO, Cusimano MD (2001) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery 49:1166–1184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellström P, Klinge P, Tans J, Wikkelsø C (2012) The neuropsychology of iNPH: findings and evaluation of tests in the European multicentre study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 114(2):130–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang K, Ko PW, Jin M, Suk K, Lee HW (2014) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and the cerebrospinal fluid tap test. J Clin Neurosci 21(8):1398–1403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang K, Yoon U, Lee JM, Lee HW (2013) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus, cortical thinning, and the cerebrospinal fluid tap test. J Neurol Sci 334(1-2):55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kiefer M, Unterberg A (2012) The differential diagnosis and treatment of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 109(1-2):15–25

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Klinge P, Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Relkin N, Black PM (2005) Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients. Neurosurgery 57(3 Suppl):S40–S52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kosmidis MH, Vlahou CH, Panagiotaki P, Kiosseoglou G (2004) The verbal fluency task in the Greek population: normative data, and clustering and switching strategies. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 10:164–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laidet M, Herrmann FR, Momjian S, Assal F, Allali G (2015) Improvement in executive subfunctions following cerebrospinal fluid tap test identifies idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from its mimics. Eur J Neurol 22:1533–1539. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JH, Yoon S, Renshaw PF, Kim TS, Jung JJ, Choi Y, Kim BN et al (2013) Morphometric changes in lateral ventricles of patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One 8(4):e60515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenfeldt N, Larsson A, Nyberg L, Andersson M, Birgander R, Eklund A, Malm J (2008) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: increased supplementary motor activity accounts for improvement after CSF drainage. Brain 131:2904–2912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahr CV, Dengl M, Nestler U, Reiss-Zimmermann M, Eichner G, Preuß M, Meixensberger J (2016) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and predictive value of clinical testing, lumbar drainage, and CSF dynamics. J Neurosurg 125(3):591–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malm J, Eklund A (2006) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Pract Neurol 6:14–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malm J, Graff-Radford NR, Ishikawa M, Kristensen B, Leinonen V, Mori E, Owler BK et al (2013) Influence of comorbidities in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—research and clinical care. A report of the ISHCSF task force on comorbidities in INPH. Fluids Barriers CNS 10(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-10-22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Black PM, Klinge P, Relkin N (2005) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:S2-1–S2-52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black PM (2005) The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3):S17–S28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Meier U, König A, Miethke C (2004) Predictors of outcome in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Neurol 51(2):59–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Miyoshi N, Kazui H, Ogino A, Ishikawa M, Miyake H, Tokunaga H, Ikejiri Y et al (2005) Association between cognitive impairment and gait disturbance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 20:71–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nowak DA, Gumprecht H, Topka H (2006) CSF drainage ameliorates the motor deficit in normal pressure hydrocephalus: evidence from the analysis of grasping movements. J Neurol 253:640–647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pinto FC, Saad F, Oliveira MF, Pereira RM, Miranda FL, Tornai JB, Lopes MI et al (2013) Role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Neurosurgery 72(5):845–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pomeraniec IJ, Bond AE, Lopes MB, Jane JA Sr (2016) Concurrent Alzheimer's pathology in patients with clinical normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlation of high-volume lumbar puncture results, cortical brain biopsies, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 124(2):382–388. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.2.JNS142318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ravdin LD, Katzena HL, Jacksona AE, Tsakanikas D, Assuras S, Relkin NR (2008) Features of gait most responsive to tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 110(5):455–461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Reitan RM, Wolfson D (1993) The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical applications. Neuropsychology Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  31. Solana E, Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Benejam B, Junqué C, Dronavalli M (2010) Cognitive and motor improvement after retesting in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a real change or merely a learning effect. J Neurosurg 112:399–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stranjalis G, Kalamatianos T, Koutsarnakis C, Loufardaki M, Stavrinou L, Sakas DE (2012) Twelve-year hospital outcomes in patients with idiopathic hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 113:115–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Toma AK, Papadopoulos MC, Stapleton S, Kitchen ND, Watkins LD (2013) Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 155:1977–1980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Torsnes L, Blåfjelldal V, Poulsen FR (2014) Treatment and clinical outcome in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—a systematic review. Dan Med J 61(10):A4911

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsakanikas D, Katzen H, Ravdin LD, Relkin NR (2009) Upper extremity motor measures of tap test response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:752–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wechsler D (1997) WAIS-III manual. The Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wikkelso C, Andersson H, Blomstrand C, Lindqvist G (1982) The clinical effect of lumbar puncture in normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 45:64–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wikkelsø C, Hellström P, Klinge PM, Tans JTJ, on behalf of the European INPH Multicentre Study Group (2013) The European INPH multicentre study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:562–568. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zalonis I, Christidi F, Bonakis A, Kararizou E, Triantafyllou NI, Paraskevas G, Kapaki E et al (2009) The stroop effect in Greek healthy population: normative data for the Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 24:81–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zalonis I, Kararizou E, Triantafyllou NI, Kapaki E, Papageorgiou S, Sgouropoulos P, Vassilopoulos D (2008) A normative study of the trail making test A and B in Greek adults. Clin Neuropsychol 22:842–850

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelia Liouta.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

The authors state that the present study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All patients gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study.

Conflict of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liouta, E., Gatzonis, S., Kalamatianos, T. et al. Finger tapping and verbal fluency post-tap test improvement in INPH: its value in differential diagnosis and shunt-treatment outcomes prognosis. Acta Neurochir 159, 2301–2307 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3301-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3301-2

Keywords

Navigation