Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limitation in monitoring depth of anesthesia: a case report

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although we describe a clinical situation that most likely occurs in hundreds of operatory rooms in the world, we report this case as provocation. It concerns an unexpected awakening from an appropriate depth of anesthesia, although the BIS monitor showed a BIS index of less than 50 for a prolonged period before and after the event. Approximately 30 min after induction of anesthesia, the patient had a hypothetic sudden arousal of consciousness, with spontaneous movements, facial muscle activation, intolerance to the tracheal tube, and tearing. After immediate intravenous administration of midazolam (4 mg), the patient returned to a depth of anesthesia status, and surgery was completed uneventfully. The patient had no recall of the event when questioned during the episode, at emergence, or at 24 h, 36 h, and 7 days after surgery. Were these events spinal reflexes to pain or stimulation although the cortex was still anesthetized? Maybe this is the more rational explanation. Was the patient awake but not aware? Is it possible that our patient experienced only a transient arousal from consciousness, and that he did not have recall because the arousal time was short and we blocked memory consolidation? The latter hypothesis provides an opportunity to discuss the evidence that at the moment there is no device to assess the depth of anesthesia. We also focus on the possibility of interfering with memory processing under anesthesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kurata J, Hemmings Jr. HC. Memory and awareness in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(suppl 1):i1–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ekman A, Lindholm ML, Lennmarken C, Sandin R. Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:20–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avidan MS, Zhang L, Burnside BA, Finkel KJ, Searleman AC, Selvidge JA, Saager L, Turner MS, Rao S, Bottros M, Hantler C, Jacobsohn E, Evers AS. Anesthesia awareness and the bispectral index. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1097–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders RD, Tononi G, Laureys S, Sleigh JW. Unresponsiveness not equal unconsciousness. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:946–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brice DD, Hetherington RR, Utting JE. A simple study of awareness and dreaming during anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1970;42:535–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mashour GA, Orser BA, Avidan MS. Intraoperative awareness: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(5):1218–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe A, Namiki A, Ujike Y, Watanabe H, Aoki M. Wakefulness during the induction with high-dose fentanyl and oxygen anesthesia. J Anesth. 1988;2(2):165–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heyse B, Proost JH, Schumacher PM, Bouillon TW, Vereecke HE, Eleveld DJ, Luginbühl M, Struys MM. Sevoflurane–remifentanil interaction: comparison of different response surface models. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):311–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shafer SL. All models are wrong. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):240–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Perouansky M, Pearce RA. How we recall (or don’t): the hippocampal memory machine and anesthetic amnesia. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:157–66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mashour GA, Esaki RK, Tremper KK, Glick DB, O’Connor M, Avidan MS. A novel classification instrument for intraoperative awareness events. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:813–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tononi G. Integrated information theory of consciousness: an updated account. Arch Ital Biol. 2012;150(4):293–329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dutton RC, Smith WD, Smith NT. Brief wakeful response to command indicates wakefulness with suppression of memory formation during surgical anesthesia. J Clin Monit. 1995;11:41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dutton RC, Smith WD, Smith NT. Wakeful response to command indicates memory potential during emergence from general anesthesia. J Clin Monit. 1995;11:35–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Timić T, Joksimović S, Milić M, Divljaković J, Batinić B, Savić MM. Midazolam impairs acquisition and retrieval, but not consolidation of reference memory in the Morris water maze. Behav Brain Res. 2013;15(241):198–200.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Semba K, Adachi N, Arai T. Facilitation of serotoninergic activity and amnesia in rats caused by intravenous anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(3):616–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishitobi S, Ayuse T, Yoshida H, Oi K, Toda K, Miyamoto T. Effects of midazolam on acquisition and extinction of conditioned taste aversion memory in rats. Neurosci Lett. 2009;450(3):270–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiebig F, Lansner A. Memory consolidation from seconds to weeks: a three-stage neural network model with autonomous reinstatement dynamics. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014;1(8):64.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fisher J, Hirshman E, Henthorn T, Arndt J, Passannante A. Midazolam amnesia and short-term/working memory processes. Conscious Cogn. 2006;15(1):54–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roehrs T, McLenaghan A, Koshorek G, Zorick F, Roth T. Amnesic effects of lormetazepam. Psychopharmacology. 1984;1:165–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiebig F, Lansner A. Memory consolidation from seconds to weeks: a three-stage neural network model with autonomous reinstatement dynamics. Front Comput Neurosci. 2014;1(8):64.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Veselis RA, Reinsel RA, Feshchenko VA, Wroński M. The comparative amnestic effects of midazolam, propofol, thiopental, and fentanyl at equisedative concentrations. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:749–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Cascella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Financial support

The study had no financial support.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cascella, M., Bifulco, F., Viscardi, D. et al. Limitation in monitoring depth of anesthesia: a case report. J Anesth 30, 345–348 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2112-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-015-2112-y

Keywords

Navigation