Abstract
Background
The aim of our study was to develop a system to grade the risk of the procedures summarized under the term endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
Methods
In a controlled prospective study, we evaluated the early complications of ERCP in 526 consecutive patients at a single endoscopy center in a defined period. The relation between endoscopic procedures and related complications was analyzed for significance. A grading system based on significant risk factors and clinical implications was developed.
Results
Of the ERCP procedures, 29% were diagnostic and 71% therapeutic. A total of 45 complications occurred in 42 patients: pancreatitis (2%), perforation (1%), cardiorespiratory problems (0.6%), stent-related complications (0.5%), leakages (1.5%), and bleeding (3%). A native papilla was a significant risk factor for the development of complications (P = 0.046). On the basis of these findings, we defined five groups of ERCP-related complications: nonnative papillae with either diagnostic (A) or therapeutic interventions (B); native papillae with diagnostic (C) or therapeutic (D) interventions; and special therapeutic interventions (E). Complication rates differed significantly between individual groups, A versus D (P = 0.013), A versus E (P = 0.010), B versus D (P = 0.005), and B versus E (P = 0.003), as well as between A/B and C/D (P = 0.003).
Conclusions
A grading system based on differentiating between native and nonnative papillae and diagnostic versus therapeutic procedures demonstrated significantly different complication rates. This grading system has the potential to predict the risk of ERCP-related complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:721–731.
Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dosher PJ. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909–918.
Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennery MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54:425–434.
Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TCK, Wong RCK, Ferrari AP, Montes H, et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:652–656.
Deans GT, Sedman P, Martin DF, Roxston CMS, Leow CK, Thomas WEG, et al. Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age-related? Gut 1997;41:545–548.
Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A, Lachter J, Chermech I, Karban A, et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52:352–355.
Christensen M, Rasmussen V, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Vagal withdrawal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:96–101.
Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:417–423.
Fröhlich E, Gonvers JJ, Vader JP, Dubois RW, Burnand B. Appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy: risk of complications. Endoscopy 1999;31:684–686.
Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costen F, Beradinis F, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998:48:1–10.
Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Greenen JE, Russell RCG, Meyers WC. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383–393.
Cotton PB. Outcomes of endoscopy procedures: struggling towards definitions. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:511–514.
Fleischer DE. Better definitions of endoscopic complications and other negative outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:514–518.
Schutz MS, Abbott RM. Grading ERCPs by degree of difficulty: a new concept to produce more meaningful outcome data. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:535–539.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuber-Jerger, I., Endlicher, E., Kullmann, F. et al. A new grading system to evaluate the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol 44, 160–165 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-008-2295-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-008-2295-1