Abstract
Background
Prevention of iatrogenic injuries is of paramount importance in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC). The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of cholangiography using a pre-inserted endoscopic naso-biliary drain (ENBD) for navigation during difficult cholecystectomies.
Methods
The study design was a retrospective case analysis. In 508 patients who underwent LC in a tertiary referral university hospital from 1996 through 2007, difficult cholecystectomy was anticipated in 26 patients due to possibly aberrant biliary anatomy (four patients), unclear cystic duct anatomy during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (three patients), and acute cholecystitis (19 patients). An ENBD was inserted during ERCP prior to LC for cholangiography (ENBDC) to facilitate safe dissection during LC. Prevalence of biliary complications was assessed as the main outcome measurement.
Results
The majority (68%) of the patients who underwent ENBDC had complicated cholecystitis. Advanced technical expertise was not required for insertion of an ENBD. In retrospect, ENBDC was useful in prevention of a possible catastrophe in 69% of cases. Open conversion was necessary in five patients and biliary complications occurred in five patients only in the non-ENBD group. There were no procedure-related complications. One limitation of the study was that it was not randomized and there was no comparison with patients without ENBDC.
Conclusions
ENBDC is a useful and safe tool in the prevention of iatrogenic bile duct injuries in LC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones RS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1991;213:665–77.
Liyanage CAH, Sabaratnam VY, Deen KI. A structured training programme in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ceylon Med J. 2006;51:74–5.
Koperna T, Kisser M, Schulz F. Laparoscopic versus open treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:753–7.
Besser P. Nasobiliary drainage for biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med Sci Int. 2001;7:118–9.
Slater K, Strong RW, Wall DR, Lynch SV. Iatrogenic bile duct injury: the scourge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg. 2002;72:83–8.
Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M, Martin MD, Yao DC, Grimes KL, et al. Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2007;142:556–65.
Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J. Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:254–8.
Nagai N, Toki F, Oi I, Suzuki H, Kozu T. Continuous endoscopic pancreatocholedochal catheterization. Gastrointest Endosc. 1976;23:78–81.
Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tuchiya T, Kurihara T. Role of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage indication and basic technique. Digest Endosc. 2006;18:105–9.
Lee WDH, Chan AC, Lam YH, Ng EK, Lau JY, Law BK, et al. Biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter or biliary stent in acute suppurative cholangitis: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:361–5.
Chow S, Bosco JJ, Heiss FW, Shea JA, Qaseem T, Howell D. Successful treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile leaks using nasobiliary tube drainage and sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:1839–43.
Suter M, Meyer A. A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe? Surg Endosc. 2001;10:1187–92.
Gigot J, Etienne J, Aerts R, Wibin E, Dallemagne B, Deweer F, et al. The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1171–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Liyanage, C.A.H., Sadakari, Y., Kitada, H. et al. Prevention of iatrogenic bile duct injuries in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies: is the naso-biliary drain the answer?. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16, 458–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0071-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0071-0