Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Developing and implementing a complex Complementary and Alternative (CAM) nursing intervention for breast and gynecologic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy—report from the CONGO (complementary nursing in gynecologic oncology) study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose/objectives

The purpose of this study was to develop a complex nursing intervention including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for breast and gynecologic cancer patients during chemotherapy to improve quality of life.

Methods

Data sources Theoretical framework and concepts, practical nursing knowledge, and evidence-based studies were compiled in interprofessional meetings.

Data synthesis The final complex intervention consists of three autonomous, but interacting components: (1) CAM nursing package, (2) resource-oriented counseling, and (3) evidence-based information material on CAM. CAM interventions include acupressure, aromatherapy, compress, and massage, targeting 14 clinically relevant symptoms during chemotherapy. Participants receive these interventions during chemotherapy with instructions for self care. During a counseling interview, the patient’s needs and preferences are assessed by trained nurses. Furthermore, participants are equipped with evidence-based information material (booklet and DVD). Prior to study start, nurses attended training modules for administering CAM therapies and for communicating and counseling within the salutogenic approach.

Conclusions

It was possible to design a multimodal CAM nursing intervention based on a theoretical concept, evidence-based studies, and practical nursing experience targeting the prevention or relief of side-effects women suffer during chemotherapy. The systematic analysis of the CONGO study will contribute to evidence-based CAM nursing care within supportive cancer care.

Implications for integrative cancer care

Oncology nurses play an important role in supportive CAM care of breast and gynecologic cancer patients in daily clinical practice. Within oncology outpatient services, the implementation of evidence-based CAM nursing interventions and counseling may contribute to understand the impact of nursing on patient quality of life and symptom relief. This can lead to a new understanding of the nurse’s professional role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robert Koch Institut, Verbreitung von Krebserkrankungen in Deutschland 2010: Berlin.

  2. Klafke N et al (2014) The varied contribution of significant others to Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) uptake by men with cancer: a qualitative analysis. Eur J Oncol Nurs 18(3):329–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wagland R et al (2014) Treatment-related problems experienced by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a scoping review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 24:605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearman T (2003) Quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in gynecologic cancer survivors. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Molassiotis A et al (2014) Evaluation of risk factors predicting chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting: results from a European prospective observational study. J Pain Symptom Manage 47(5):839–848, e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dodd MJ et al (2010) The effect of symptom clusters on functional status and quality of life in women with breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14(2):101–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lefkowits C et al (2014) Predictors of high symptom burden in gynecologic oncology outpatients: who should be referred to outpatient palliative care? Gynecol Oncol 132(3):698–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. S3 Leitline Brustkrebs, http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-045OL_l_S3__Brustkrebs_Mammakarzinom_Diagnostik_Therapie_Nachsorge_ 2012-07.pdf, 2012.

  9. Deng G et al (2009) Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for integrative oncology: complementary therapies and botanicals. J Soc Integr Oncol 7(3):85–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basch E et al (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29(31):4189–98

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tipton JM et al (2007) Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions to prevent, manage, and treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Clin J Oncol Nurs 11(1):69–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Institutes of Health. Cancer and Complementary Health Approaches. 2014 [cited 2014 November]; Available from: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/cancer/camcancer.htm#aboutCHA.

  13. Horneber M et al (2012) How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Integr Cancer Ther 11(3):187–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kristoffersen AE, Norheim AJ, Fonnebo VM (2013) Complementary and alternative medicine Use among Norwegian cancer survivors: gender-specific prevalence and associations for use. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:318781

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Boon HS, Olatunde F, Zick SM (2007) Trends in complementary/alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005. BMC Womens Health 7:4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tautz E et al (2012) Use of complementary and alternative medicine in breast cancer patients and their experiences: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Cancer 48(17):3133–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pirri C (2012) Complementary and alternative medicine used by patients with cancer: evidence for efficacy and safety. In: Olver IN, Robotin M (eds) Perspectives on complementary and alternative medicine. Imperial College Press, London, pp 31–78

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schofield P et al (2010) Effectively discussing complementary and alternative medicine in a conventional oncology setting: communication recommendations for clinicians. Patient Educ Couns 79(2):143–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. S3 Leitlinie Zervix, http://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/032-033OLl_S3_Zervixkarzinom_2014-10.pdf, 2014.

  20. Fitch MI et al (1999) Oncology nurses’ perspectives on unconventional therapies. Cancer Nurs 22(1):90–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wanchai A, Armer JM, Stewart BR (2013) Thai nurses’ perspectives on the use of complementary and alternative medicine among Thai breast cancer survivors in northern Thailand. Int J Nurs Pract 21:118–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neuberger PWHK, Trautmann C, Sohn C, Schneeweiss A, Hagens CV (2012) Mit Lavendel, Thymian & Co die Behandlung unterstützen. Die Schwester Der Pfleger 51:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cant S, Watts P, Ruston A (2011) Negotiating competency, professionalism and risk: the integration of complementary and alternative medicine by nurses and midwives in NHS hospitals. Soc Sci Med 72(4):529–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rojas-Cooley MT, Grant M (2006) Complementary and alternative medicine: oncology nurses’ experiences, educational interests, and resources. Oncol Nurs Forum 33(3):581–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kruijver IP et al (2000) Evaluation of communication training programs in nursing care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 39(1):129–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Towler P, Molassiotis A, Brearley SG (2013) What is the evidence for the use of acupuncture as an intervention for symptom management in cancer supportive and palliative care: an integrative overview of reviews. Support Care Cancer 21(10):2913–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ernst E, Lee MS (2010) Acupuncture for palliative and supportive cancer care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. J Pain Symptom Manage 40(1):e3–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boehm K, Bussing A, Ostermann T (2012) Aromatherapy as an adjuvant treatment in cancer care—a descriptive systematic review. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med 9(4):503–18

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ling WM et al (2014) Effects of acupuncture and acupressure on cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review. Oncol Nurs Forum 41(6):581–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pan YQ et al (2014) Massage interventions and treatment-related side effects of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 19(5):829–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mishra SI et al (2012) Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for people with cancer during active treatment. Clin Otolaryngol 37(5):390–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, Kravits K (2013) Hypnosis for cancer care: over 200 years young. CA Cancer J Clin 63(1):31–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Faller H et al (2013) Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 31(6):782–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beatty LJ et al (2012) Evaluating the impact of cancer on complementary and alternative medicine use, distress and health related QoL among Australian women: a prospective longitudinal investigation. Complement Ther Med 20(1–2):61–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Deng, G. and B. Cassileth, Integrative oncology: an overview. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, 2014: p. 233–42

  36. Rosenthal DS, Doherty-Gilman AM (2011) Integrative medicine and cancer care. Virtual Mentor 13(6):379–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Standish LJ et al (2013) Can we demonstrate that breast cancer “integrative oncology” is effective? A methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of integrative oncology offered in community clinics. Integr Cancer Ther 12(2):126–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Klafke, N., et al., A complex nursing care intervention on Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) to increase quality of life in patients with breast and gynecologic cancer undegoing chemotherapy (CONGO study): study protocol for a partially randomized controlled trial. Trials, 2015. 16(51).

  39. Levine ME (1967) The four conservation principles of nursing. Nurs Forum 6(1):45–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moore Schaefer K, Benson Pond J (1991) Levine’s Conservation Model. A Framework for Nursing Practice. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  41. Moore Schaefer K (1996) In: Hinton Walker P, Neumann B (eds) Levine’s Conservation Model: Caring for Women with Chronic Illness, in Blueprint for use of nursing models: education, research, practice & administration. NLN Press, New York City

    Google Scholar 

  42. Melancon B, Miller LH (2005) Massage therapy versus traditional therapy for low back pain relief: implications for holistic nursing practice. Holist Nurs Pract 19(3):116–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mock V et al (2001) Fatigue and quality of life outcomes of exercise during cancer treatment. Cancer Pract 9(3):119–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mock V et al (2005) Exercise manages fatigue during breast cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology 14(6):464–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mock V et al (2007) Using a conceptual model in nursing research—mitigating fatigue in cancer patients. J Adv Nurs 58(5):503–12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Brown CG, Isaacs D (2010) The World Cafe. Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  47. Anderson L (2011) Use the World Cafe concept to create an interactive learning environment. Educ Prim Care 22(5):337–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Antonovsky A (1979) Health, stress, and coping: New perspectives on mental and physical well-being. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  49. Becker CM et al (2015) Adapting and using quality management methods to improve health promotion. Explore (NY) 11(3):222–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Giesler JM, Weis J (2008) Developing a self-rating measure of patient competence in the context of oncology: a multi-center study. Psychooncology 17(11):1089–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nagel G, Schreiber D (2013) Patientenkompetez und Selfempowerment bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs im Frühstadium: Ein Modell der Kompetenzberatung. Senologie 10:50–59

    Google Scholar 

  52. Huebner J (2008) Komplementäre Onkologie: supportive Maßnahmen und evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  53. Techniker Krankenkasse Komplementärmedizin für Krebspatienten. Wie lässt sich die konventionelle Krebstherapie sinnvoll ergänzen? 2014.

  54. Techniker Krankenkasse Komplementärmedizin für Krebspatienten. 9 Videos, in den Patienten erfahren, wie sie ihre schulmedizinische Krebstherapie selbst sinnvoll ergänzen können. 2014.

  55. Haefeli WE, Carls A (2014) Drug interactions with phytotherapeutics in oncology. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 10(3):359–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Coolbrandt A et al (2014) Characteristics and effectiveness of complex nursing interventions aimed at reducing symptom burden in adult patients treated with chemotherapy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud 51(3):495–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Huebner J et al (2014) Online survey of patients with breast cancer on complementary and alternative medicine. Breast Care (Basel) 9(1):60–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Isermann M, Diegelmann C (2009) Ressourcenorientierte Psychoonkologie: Psyche und Körper ermutigen. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the involved nurses and the scientific advisory board for their involvement, commitment, and expertise in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, D-69115, Heidelberg, Germany

    Nadja Klafke, Cornelia Mahler & Martina Bentner

  2. Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Outpatient Department of Classical Natural Medicine and Integrative Medicine, University Women’s Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Cornelia von Hagens

  3. Krausbitzchen 32, D-53332, Bornheim Sechtem, Germany

    Gisela Blaser

  4. Institute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tuebingen, Oesterbergstr. 9, D-72074, Tuebingen, Germany

    Stefanie Joos

Authors
  1. Nadja Klafke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cornelia Mahler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cornelia von Hagens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gisela Blaser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Martina Bentner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stefanie Joos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadja Klafke.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study is funded by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) under the number: 01GY1334 (Förderkennzeichen).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klafke, N., Mahler, C., von Hagens, C. et al. Developing and implementing a complex Complementary and Alternative (CAM) nursing intervention for breast and gynecologic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy—report from the CONGO (complementary nursing in gynecologic oncology) study. Support Care Cancer 24, 2341–2350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3038-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3038-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation