Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investigating the benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism in a prospective randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation in treating cancer patients with venous thromboembolism remains controversial. We initiated this study as the first prospectively randomized trial to evaluate the addition of a vena cava filter placement to anticoagulation with the factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer.

Methods

Sixty-four patients with deep vein thrombosis (86 %) and/or pulmonary embolism (55 %) were randomly assigned to receive anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium with or without a vena cava filter. Endpoints included rates of complications by treatment arm, recurrent thromboembolism, complete resolution of thromboembolism, and survival rates.

Results

No patient had a recurrent deep vein thrombosis; two (3 %) patients had new pulmonary emboli, one in each randomized cohort. Major bleeding occurred in three patients (5 %). Two patients on the vena cava filter arm (7 %) had complications from the filter. Median survivals were 493 days in the anticoagulation only arm and 266 days for anticoagulation + vena cava filter (p < 0.57). Complete resolution of venous thromboembolism occurred in 51 % of patients within 8 weeks of initiating anticoagulation.

Conclusions

No advantage was found for placement of a vena cava filter in addition to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in terms of safety, recurrent thrombosis, recurrent pulmonary embolism, or survival in this prospective randomized trial evaluating anticoagulation plus a vena cava filter in cancer patients. Favorable complete resolution rates of thrombosis were observed on both study arms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mandala M, Falanga A, Roila F. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management. Ann Oncol 21 (Suppl 5):v274–v276

  2. Lee AY, Levine MN, Baker RI et al (2003) Low-molecular-weight heparin versus a coumarin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 349:146–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deitcher SR, Kessler CM, Merli G et al (2006) Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events in patients with active cancer: enoxaparin alone versus initial enoxaparin followed by warfarin for a 180-day period. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 12:389–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iorio A, Guercini F, Pini M (2003) Low-molecular-weight heparin for the long-term treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: meta-analysis of the randomized comparisons with oral anticoagulants. J Thromb Haemost 1:1906–1913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A et al (2002) Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 100:3484–3488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kearon C (2003) Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 107:I22–I30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson PO, Sorbo J, Eriksson H (2000) Recurrent venous thromboembolism after deep vein thrombosis: incidence and risk factors. Arch Intern Med 160:769–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perzborn E, Roehrig S, Straub A et al. (2011) The discovery and development of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Nature Rev 10:61–75

    Google Scholar 

  9. Streiff MB (2010) The National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guidelines on the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. Thromb Res 125 (Suppl 2):S128–S133

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A et al (2007) American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline: recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:5490–5505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. White RH, Zhou H, Kim J, Romano PS (2000) A population-based study of the effectiveness of inferior vena cava filter use among patients with venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 160:2033–2041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barginear MF, Lesser M, Akerman ML et al (2009) Need for inferior vena cava filters in cancer patients: a surrogate marker for poor outcome. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 15:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein PD, Kayali F, Olson RE (2004) Twenty-one-year trends in the use of inferior vena cava filters. Arch Intern Med 164:1541–1545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Streiff MaKK (2011) Vena cava filters: A call to action. CHEST Physician Article

  15. PREPIC Study Group (2005) Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation 112:416–422

    Google Scholar 

  16. Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F et al (1998) A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prevention du Risque d’Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med 338:409–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Levin JM, Schiff D, Loeffler JS et al (1993) Complications of therapy for venous thromboembolic disease in patients with brain tumors. Neurology 43:1111–1114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Calligaro KD, Bergen WS, Haut MJ et al (1991) Thromboembolic complications in patients with advanced cancer: anticoagulation versus Greenfield filter placement. Ann Vasc Surg 5:186–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen JR, Tenenbaum N, Citron M (1991) Greenfield filter as primary therapy for deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer. Surgery 109:12–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Olin JW, Young JR, Graor RA et al (1987) Treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary emboli in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors. Anticoagulants or inferior vena cava filter? Arch Intern Med 147:2177–2179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schiff D, DeAngelis LM (1994) Therapy of venous thromboembolism in patients with brain metastases. Cancer 73:493–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Douketis JD, Kearon C, Bates S et al (1998) Risk of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with treated venous thromboembolism. JAMA 279:458–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A et al (2003) CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 13:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirsh J (1991) Reliability of non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 65:221–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee ET (ed) (1992) Statistical methods for survival data analysis, vol 2. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greenwood M (ed) (1926) The errors of sampling of the survivorship table. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, Vol. 33 of Reports on Public Health and Medical Patients

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stawicki SP, Sims CA, Sharma R et al (2008) Vena cava filters: a synopsis of complications and related topics. The J Vasc Access 9:102–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer G, Marjanovic Z, Valcke J et al (2002) Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 162:1729–1735

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Deitcher SR, Carman TL (2002) Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 4:223–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buller HR, Davidson BL, Decousus H et al (2003) Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 349:1695–1702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Akl EA, Vasireddi SR, Gunukula S et al. Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD006649

  32. Siragusa S, Cosmi B, Piovella F et al (1996) Low-molecular-weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in the treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism: results of a meta-analysis. Am J Med 100:269–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bates SM, Greer IA, Pabinger I et al (2008) Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133:844S–886S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al (2006) Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:449–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study is supported in part by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline.

Conflict of interest

There are no financial disclosures from any authors

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myra F. Barginear.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 5 Adapted from Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barginear, M.F., Gralla, R.J., Bradley, T.P. et al. Investigating the benefit of adding a vena cava filter to anticoagulation with fondaparinux sodium in patients with cancer and venous thromboembolism in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 20, 2865–2872 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1413-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1413-z

Keywords

Navigation