Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of arteriovenous fistulas and central venous lines for long-term chronic haemodialysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the Fistula First initiative there is still reluctance to use arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for chronic haemodialysis (HD) in children. Our aim was to compare outcomes of AVFs and central venous lines (CVL) in children on chronic HD in a centre where AVF is the primary choice for vascular access.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective case notes analysis of access complications, dialysis adequacy and laboratory outcomes in children who underwent dialysis for at least a year by AVF (n = 20, median age 14.2 years, range (2.9–16.5) and CVL (n = 5, median age 2.4 years, range 2.0–12.2) between January 2007 and December 2010.

Results

Primary access failure rate (patient-months) was 1 per 78.8 for AVF (n = 5) and 1 per 15.5 for CVLs (n = 7, p = 0.3). Failure thereafter was 1 per 131.3 and 1 per 18.5 for AVF and CVLs respectively (n = 3 and 6 respectively; p = 0.2). The annualised hospitalisation rate for access malfunction was 0.44% and 3.1% for AVFs and CVLs respectively (p = 0.004). Patients with AVFs had a lower infection rate of 0.25 per 100 patient-months compared with CVL at 3.2 per 100 (p = 0.002). There was no difference in dialysis adequacy or laboratory values between AVF and CVL groups. Access survival rates (including both primary and secondary access failure) were significantly higher for AVF compared with CVL (p = 0.0002, hazard ratio = 0.15, 95% confidence interval 0.04–0.37).

Conclusions

Patients with AVF spend less time in hospital than those dialysed by CVLs and have a much lower access infection rate. These findings emphasise the need to use AVF as first-line access for paediatric patients on chronic HD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (1999) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: ESRD special project—developing clinical performance measures for care of patients with end stage renal disease, final report. Clinical performance measure: vascular access I: maximising placement of arterial venous fistulae (AVF). p 19

  2. De Souza RA, Oliveira EA, Penido Silva JM, Lima EM (2011) Haemodialysis vascular access in children and adolescents: a 10-year restrospective cohort study. J Bras Nephrol 33:422–430

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zaritsky JJ, Salusky IB, Gales B, Ramos G, Atkinson J, Allestead A, Brandt ML, Goldstein SL (2008) Vascular access complications in long-term pediatric hemodialysis patients. Pediatr Nephrol 23:2061–2065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chand DH, Bendnarz D, Eagleton M, Krajewski L (2009) A vascular access team can increase AV fistula creation in pediatric ESRD patients: a single center experience. Semin Dial 22:679–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fishbach M, Edefonti A, Schroder C, Watson A, The European Pediatric Dialysis working group (2005) Hemodialysis in children: general practice guidelines. Pediatr Nephrol 18:1172–1176

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chand DH, Valentini RP (2008) International pediatric fistula first initiative: a call to action. Am J Kidney Dis 51:1016–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes WN, Watson AR, Callagan N, Wright E, Stenfanidis CJ, The European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group (2011) Vascular access: choice and complications in European paediatric haemodialysis units. Pediatr Nephrol 27:999–1004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fadrowski JJ, Hwang W, Neu AM, Fivush BA, Furth SL (2009) Patterns of use of vascular catheters for hemodialysis in children in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 53:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chand DH, Valentini RP, Kamil ES (2009) Hemodialysis vascular access options in pediatrics: considerations for patients and practitioners. Pediatr Nephrol 24:1121–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Kidney foundation (2006) (K-DOQI) Clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for 2006 updates: haemodialysis adequacy, peritoneal dialysis and vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 48 [Suppl]:S1–S322

    Google Scholar 

  11. Annual Report of North America Paediatrics Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies(NAPRTCS) (2008) http://spitfire.emmes.com/study/ped/annlrept/Annual

  12. Vazquez MA (2009) Vascular access for dialysis: recent lessons and new insights. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 18:116–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wander JV, Moore ES, Jonasson O (1970) Internal arteriovenous fistulae for dialysis in children. J Pediatr Surg 5:533–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) (2006) Annual Report. Dialysis Access Data 2006

  15. Sheth RD, Brandt M, Brewer ED, Nuchtern JG, Kale AS, Goldstein LS (2002) Permanent hemodialysis vascular access survival in children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 62:1864–1869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goolsb MJ (2002) National Kidney Foundation Guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 14:238–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Briones L, Diaz Moreno A, Sierre S, Lopez L, Lipsich J, Adragna M (2010) Permanent vascular access survival in children on long-term chronic hemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 25:1731–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miguel JJ, Chow J (2009) Vascular dialysis access flow measurement: early intervention through early detection. J Ren Care 35:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, A., Shroff, R., Hothi, D. et al. A comparison of arteriovenous fistulas and central venous lines for long-term chronic haemodialysis. Pediatr Nephrol 28, 321–326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2318-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2318-2

Keywords

Navigation