Abstract.
While the routine measurement of blood pressure (BP) in children is common practice, there is lack of uniformity in the types of devices used to measure BP in children. Oscillometric devices are replacing conventional sphygmomanometry in many medical centers. However, the BP determined by these two methods is not identical, nor is it systematically different. Moreover, there is paucity of normative data on oscillometric BP measurements in children. Since oscillometric devices may well ultimately replace conventional standard mercury and aneroid manometers, users of these devices need not only to ensure strict adherence to the technique of obtaining BPs as put forth by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, but also to be certain that the specific device being used has been tested for accuracy in children of the target age in accordance with standard guidelines, and that they are regularly maintained and calibrated. Due to limited normative data on BPs using oscillometric devices in children, we feel that further studies are needed before the auscultatory methods can be altogether eliminated.
References
Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Brown C, Cutler JA, Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D (1995) Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. Results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991. Hypertension 25:305–313
Sinaiko AR, Gomez-Marin O, Prineas RJ (1989) Prevalence of "significant" hypertension in junior high school-aged children: the Children and Adolescent Blood Pressure Program. J Pediatr 114:664–669
Mehta SK (1987) Pediatric hypertension. A challenge for pediatricians. Am J Dis Child 141:893–894
Lauer RM, Clarke WR (1989) Childhood risk factors for high adult blood pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 84:633–641
Vogt BA, Birk PE, Panzarino V, Hite SH, Kashtan CE (1999) Aortic dissection in young patients with chronic hypertension. Am J Kidney Dis 33:374–378
Hari P, Bagga A, Srivastava RN (2000) Sustained hypertension in children. Indian Pediatr 37:268–274
Cooney MJ, Bradley WG, Symko SC, Patel ST, Groncy PK (2000) Hypertensive encephalopathy: complication in children treated for myeloproliferative disorders—report of three cases. Radiology 214:711–716
Sorof JM, Cardwell G, Franco K, Portman RJ (2002) Ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular mass index in hypertensive children. Hypertension 39:903–908
Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children (1987) Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children—1987. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Pediatrics 79:1-25
O'Brien E (2002) Has conventional sphygmomanometry ended with the banning of mercury? Blood Press Monit 7:37–40
Ramsey M 3rd (1991) Blood pressure monitoring: automated oscillometric devices. J Clin Monit 7:56–67
Smith GR (2000) Devices for blood pressure measurement. Prof Nurse 15:337–340
Park MK, Menard SM (1989) Normative oscillometric blood pressure values in the first 5 years in an office setting. Am J Dis Child 143:860–864
Elkasabany AM, Urbina EM, Daniels SR, Berenson GS (1998) Prediction of adult hypertension by K4 and K5 diastolic blood pressure in children: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr 132:687–692
Park MK, Menard SM (1987) Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children. Pediatrics 79:907–914
Canzanello VJ, Jensen PL, Schwartz GL (2001) Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings? Arch Intern Med 161:729–731
Wattigney WA, Webber LS, Lawrence MD, Berenson GS (1996) Utility of an automatic instrument for blood pressure measurement in children. The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Hypertens 9:256–262
Gillman MW, Cook NR (1995) Blood pressure measurement in childhood epidemiological studies. Circulation 92:1049–1057
O'Brien E (2000) Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer. Requires clinicians to demand better automated devices. BMJ 320:815–816
Kaufmann MA, Pargger H, Drop LJ (1996) Oscillometric blood pressure measurements by different devices are not interchangeable. Anesth Analg 82:377–381
Colan SD, Fujii A, Borow KM, MacPherson D, Sanders SP (1983) Noninvasive determination of systolic, diastolic and end-systolic blood pressure in neonates, infants and young children: comparison with central aortic pressure measurements. Am J Cardiol 52:867–870
Park MK, Menard SW, Yuan C (2001) Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 155:50–53
O'Brien E (2000) Proposals for simplifying the validation protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Blood Press Monit 5:43–45
O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG (2001) Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 322:531–536
Jin RZ, Donaghue KC, Fairchild J, Chan A, Silink M (2001) Comparison of Dinamap 8100 with sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurement in a prepubertal diabetes cohort. J Paediatr Child Health 37:545–549
O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K (1993) Short report: accuracy of the Dinamap portable monitor, model 8100 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J Hypertens 11:761–763
Rose KM, Arnett DK, Ellison RC, Heiss G (2000) Skip patterns in DINAMAP-measured blood pressure in 3 epidemiological studies. Hypertension 35:1032–1036
Moss AJ, Adams FH (1963) Index of indirect estimation of diastolic blood pressure. Am J Dis Child 106:364–367
Acknowledgements.
The authors thank Mr. Christopher Hartung for editorial assistance and for his help in preparing the illustrations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Butani, L., Morgenstern, B.Z. Are pitfalls of oscillometric blood pressure measurements preventable in children?. Pediatr Nephrol 18, 313–318 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1075-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1075-7