Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasonic energy vs monopolar electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Influence on the postoperative systemic immune response

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The influence of surgical operations on the systemic immune response is proportional to the degree of trauma. Ultrasonic surgery can dissect structures and divide vessels by the effect produced by vibrations in the tissues. It is believed to be less traumatic than the more commonly used monopolar electrosurgery. This randomized study compares the systemic immune response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using either ultrasonic energy or monopolar electrosurgery.

Methods

Eighteen patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to treatment using either a harmonic scalpel and clips or monopolar electrosurgery and clips. Postoperative inflammatory response was assessed via changes in the white blood cell count and levels of C-reactive protein. Postoperative immune function was assessed by measuring monocyte HLA-DR expression.

Results

Both the harmonic scalpel and the use of monopolar electrosurgery resulted in activation of the systemic immune response. No significant differences between the two groups were observed.

Conclusion

The harmonic scalpel and monopolar electrosurgery are equally traumatic in terms of activation of the systemic immune response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amaral JF (1994) Ultrasonic dissection. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2: 181–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amaral JF (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystctomy in 200 consecutive patients using an ultrasonically activated scalpel. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 255–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hambley R, Hebda PA, Abell E, Cohen BA, Jegasothy BV (1988) Wound healing of skin incisions produced by ultrasonically vibrating knife, scalpel, electrosurgery, and carbon dioxide laser. J Dematol Surg Oncol 14: 1213–1217

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hensman C, Baty D, Willes RG, Cuschieri A (1998) Chemical composition of smoke produced by high-frequency electrosurgery in a closed gaseous environment. Surg Endosc 12: 1017–1019 DOI: 10.1007/s004649900771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson A (1997) Laparoscopic surgery. Lancet 349: 631–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kloosterman T, von Blomberg ME, Borgstein P, Cuesta MA, Schepers RJ, Meijer S (1994) Unimpaired immune function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 115: 424–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maas SM, Hage JJ, Cuesta MA, Bloemena E (1998) Total laparoscopic ultrasonic dissection: is the colonic anastomisis safe? [Letter]. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 404–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McAnena OJ, Willson PD (1993) Diathermy in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 80: 1094–1096

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reddick EJ, Olsen DO (1990) Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 160: 485–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vittimberga FJ, Foley DP, Meyers WC, Callery MP (1998) Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response. Ann Surg 227: 326–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 14 September 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sietses, C., Eijsbouts, Q.A.J., von Blomberg, B.M.E. et al. Ultrasonic energy vs monopolar electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15, 69–71 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640010061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640010061

Key words

Navigation