Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the need for routine esophagram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel surgical option for the treatment of achalasia. Most centers perform a routine esophagram on postoperative day (POD) #1 to rule esophageal perforation and leaks. In this study, we sought to determine the clinical utility of routine contrast studies post-POEM.

Methods

POEM was performed using an anterior submucosal tunnel and selective myotomy of the circular muscle layer. A routine contrast esophagram was obtained on POD #1. We conducted a retrospective review of the radiologists’ interpretations of these studies and compared them to patient’s clinical course.

Results

Seventy-eight patients were included. Among these, two complications occurred. One patient was non-compliant with postoperative nil per os orders and developed epigastric pain suspicious for a leak that was demonstrated on esophagram. Another patient had subcutaneous emphysema on POD #1 esophagram, a finding that was also present on physical examination, without esophageal leakage. Another esophagram in an asymptomatic patient was suspicious for submucosal tunnel hematoma which prompted a return to the operating room with negative results. Overall, 56 patients had abnormal studies. POD #1 esophagram demonstrated a sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 45 % in identifying clinically significant complications.

Conclusions

In this series, we found routine esophagram to have a high sensitivity but a very low specificity in detecting clinically significant complications. Routine esophagram after POEM may not be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis DL, Katzka DA (2010) Achalasia: update on the disease and its treatment. Gastroenterology 139(2):369–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G (2013) The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology 145(5):954–965. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blatnik JA, Ponsky JL (2014) Advances in the treatment of achalasia. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 12(1):49–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindenmann J, Matzi V, Neuboeck N et al (2013) Management of esophageal perforation in 120 consecutive patients: clinical impact of a structured treatment algorithm. J Gastrointest Surg 17(6):1036–1043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Melman L, Quinlan JA, Hall BL et al (2009) Clinical utility of routine barium esophagram after laparoscopic anterior esophageal myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 23(3):606–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciarolla DA, Traube M (1993) Achalasia, short-term clinical monitoring after pneumatic dilation. Dig Dis Sci 38(10):1905–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stavropoulos SN, Modayil RJ, Friedel D et al (2013) The international per oral endoscopic myotomy survey (IPOEMS): a snapshot of the global POEM experience. Surg Endosc 27(9):3322–3338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. POEM White Paper Committee (2014) Per-oral endoscopic myotomy white paper summary. Gastrointest Endosc 80(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harmath CB, Horowitz J, Berggruen S et al (2015) Fluoroscopic findings post-peroral esophageal myotomy. Abdom Imaging 40(2):237–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Swanstrom LL, Kurian A, Dunst CM et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: the POEM procedure. Ann Surg 256(4):659–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Santos BF et al (2014) Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes one year after peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia. Surg Endosc 28(12):3359–3365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Familiari P, Gigante G, Marchese M et al (2014) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: outcomes of the first 100 patients with short-term follow-up. Ann Surg Oct 30 (Epub ahead of print)

  13. Li QL, Whou PH, Yao LQ et al (2013) Early diagnosis and management of delayed bleeding in the submucosal tunnel after peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 78(2):370–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Von Renteln D, Fuchs KH, Fockens P et al (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology 145(2):309–311 (e1-3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynch KL, Pandolfino JE, Howden CW et al (2012) Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol 107(12):1817–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C et al (2009) Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 249(1):45–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, Arafat FO et al (2014) Analysis of a learning curve and predictors of intraoperative difficulty for peroral esophageal myotomy (POEM). J Gastrointest Surg 18(1):92–98 (discussion 98-9)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata A et al (2013) Peroral endoscopic esophageal myotomy: defining the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 77(5):719–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren Z, Zhong Y, Zhou P et al (2012) Perioperative management and treatment for complications during and after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia (EA) (data from 119 cases). Surg Endosc 26(11):3267–3272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaezi MF, Baker ME, Richter JE (1999) Assessment of esophageal emptying post-pneumatic dilation: use of the timed barium esophagram. Am J Gastroenterol 94(7):1802–1807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoo C, Levine MS, Redfern RO et al (2004) Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication: findings and predictive value of early postoperative radiographic studies. Abdom Imaging 29(6):643–647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tano S, Horiki N, Omata F et al (2015) Second and third-look endoscopy for the prevention of post-ESD bleeding. Med (Baltim) 94(6):e491

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Rowena Martinez, RN, and Colleen Krantz, RN, for their help coordinating the clinical aspects of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rym El Khoury.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Eric Hungness receives an honorarium for educational activities from Baxter, which is unrelated to this study. Nathaniel Soper is on the scientific advisory boards of TransEnterix and Miret Surgical, which are unrelated to this study. Ezra Teitelbaum, Joel Sternbach, John Pandolfino, Peter Kahrilas, Carla Harmath, and Rym El Khoury have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Khoury, R., Teitelbaum, E.N., Sternbach, J.M. et al. Evaluation of the need for routine esophagram after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc 30, 2969–2974 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4585-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4585-z

Keywords

Navigation