Abstract
Background
The potential for shrinkage of intraperitoneally implanted meshes for laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia (LRVIH) remains a concern. Numerous experimental studies on this issue reported very inconsistent results. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) mesh has the unique property of being revealed by computed tomography (CT). We therefore conducted an analysis of CT findings in patients who had previously undergone LRVIH with an ePTFE mesh (DualMesh, WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) in order to evaluate the shrinkage of implanted meshes.
Patients and methods
Of 656 LRVIH patients with DualMesh, all patients who subsequently underwent CT scanning were identified and only those with precisely known transverse diameter of implanted mesh and with CT scans made more than 3 months postoperatively were selected (n = 40). Two radiologists who were blinded to the size of the implanted mesh measured in consensus the maximal transverse diameter of the meshes by using the AquariusNET program (TeraRecon Inc., San Mateo, CA, USA). Mesh shrinkage was defined as the relative loss of transverse diameter as compared with the original transverse diameter of the mesh.
Results
The mean time from LRVIH to CT scan was 17.9 months (range 3–59 months). The mean shrinkage of the mesh was 7.5% (range 0–23.7%). For 11 patients (28%) there was no shrinkage at all. Shrinkage of 1–10% was found in 16 patients (40%), of 10–20% in 10 patients (25%), and of 20–24% in 3 patients (7.5%). No correlation was found regarding the elapsed time between LRVIH and CT, and shrinkage. There were two recurrences, one possibly related to shrinkage.
Conclusion
Our observations indicate that shrinkage of DualMesh is remarkably lower than has been reported in experimental studies (8–51%). This study is the first to address the problem of shrinkage after intraperitoneal implantation of synthetic mesh in a clinical material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Garcia-Urena MA, Vega Ruiz V, Diaz Godoy A, Baez Perea JM, Marin Gomez LM, Carnero Hernandez FJ, Velasco Garcia MA (2007) Differences in polypropylene shrinkage depending on mesh position in an experimental study. Am J Surg 193:538–542
Harrell AG, Novitsky YW, Peindl RD, Cobb WS, Austin CE, Cristiano JA, Norton JH, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2006) Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model. Am Surg 72:808–813 (discussion 813–814)
Jacob BP, Hogle NJ, Durak E, Kim T, Fowler DL (2007) Tissue ingrowth and bowel adhesion formation in an animal comparative study: polypropylene versus Proceed versus Parietex Composite. Surg Endosc 21:629–633
Burger JW, Halm JA, Wijsmuller AR, ten Raa S, Jeekel J (2006) Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc 20:1320–1325
Judge TW, Parker DM, Dinsmore RC (2007) Abdominal wall hernia repair: a comparison of sepramesh and parietex composite mesh in a rabbit hernia model. J Am Coll Surg 204:276–281
Ladurner R, Drosse I, Seitz S, Plitz W, Barbaryka G, Siebeck M, Burklein D, Kirchhoff C, Buhman S, Mutschler W, Schieker M, Mussack T (2008) Tissue attachment strength and adhesion formation of intraabdominal fixed meshes with cyanoacrylate glues. Eur J Med Res 13:185–191
Bellon JM, Rodriguez M, Garcia Honduvilla N, Pascual G, Bujan J (2007) Partially absorbable meshes for hernia repair offer advantages over nonabsorbable meshes. Am J Surg 194:68–74
Novitsky YW, Harrell AG, Cristiano JA, Paton BL, Norton HJ, Peindl RD, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2007) Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit. J Surg Res 140:6–11
Schug Pass C, Tamme C, Tannapfel A, Kockerling F (2006) A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model. Surg Endosc 20:402–409
McGinty JJ, Hogle NJ, McCarthy H, Fowler DL (2005) A comparative study of adhesion formation and abdominal wall ingrowth after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in a porcine model using multiple types of mesh. Surg Endosc 19:786–790
Johnson EK, Hoyt CH, Dinsmore RC (2004) Abdominal wall hernia repair: a long-term comparison of Sepramesh and Dualmesh in a rabbit hernia model. Am Surg 70:657–661
Schug Pass C, Tamme C, Sommerer F, Tannapfel A, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2008) A lightweight, partially absorbable mesh (Ultrapro) for endoscopic hernia repair: experimental biocompatibility results obtained with a porcine model. Surg Endosc 22:1100–1106
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Job van der Palen, epidemiologist, PhD, for his assistance with statistics.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schoenmaeckers, E.J.P., van der Valk, S.B.A., van den Hout, H.W. et al. Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. Surg Endosc 23, 1620–1623 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0500-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0500-9