Skip to main content
Log in

Delayed laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with severe fibrotic adhesions

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Conversion rate to open surgery is higher for patients with acute cholecystitis than in those without acute cholecystitis. We attempted to develop a laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy to decrease this conversion rate.

Methods

From 2000 to 2005, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed in 60 patients (22 women, 38 men). Patients were divided into two groups: group A (2000 to 2002, n = 22) and group B (2003 to 2005, n = 38). When significant difficulty was encountered dissecting the gallbladder from its bed, we incised the gallbladder wall leaving the posterior wall and cauterizing the remnant mucosa (subtotal cholecystectomy, SC-1). When dissection of the gall bladder neck and triangle of Calot was difficult, the neck of the gallbladder was sutured despite clipping (SC-2).

Results

Mean duration from onset of symptoms to operation was 55.3 ± 52.0 days. SC-1 was performed in 8 patients in group A and 18 patients in group B. SC-2 was performed in three patients in Group B. Conversion rate was 18.1% (4/22) in group A and 0% (0/38) in group B, compared to 0.4% (1/221) for patients without acute cholecystitis. No complications were associated with ablated gallbladder mucosa.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy offers safe and effective treatment for acute cholecystitis. The conversion rate in group B is decreased by avoiding hazardous dissection of the cystic duct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beldi G, Glattli A (2003) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 17:1437–1439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickel A, Shtamler B (1993) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 3:365–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR (2002) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg 6:800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bornman PC, Terblanche J (1985) Subtotal cholecystectomy: for the difficult gallbladder in poratal hypertension and cholecystitis. Surgery 98:1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Mann V, Baijal M, Vashistha A (2000) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a review of 56 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:31–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cottier DJ, Mckay C, Anderson JR (1991) Subtotal cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 78:1326–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eldar S, Sabo E, Nash E, Abrahamson J, Matter I (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial. World J Surg 21:540–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gharaibeh KI, Oasaimeh GR, AI-Heiss H, Ammari F, Bani-Hani K, AI-Jaberi TM, AI-Natour S (2002) Effect of timing of surgery, type of inflammation, and sex on outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Habib FA, Kolachalam RB, Khilnani R, Preventza O, Mittal VK (2001) Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous cholecystitis. Am J Surg 181:71–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji W, Li LT, Li JS (2006) Role of laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in the treatment of complicated cholecystitis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 5:584–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knight JS, Mercer SJ, Somers SS, Walters AM, Sadek SA, Toh SK (2004) Timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate. Br J Surg 91:601–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lau H, Lo CY, Patil NG, Yuen WK (2006) Early versus delayed-interval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a metaanalysis. Surg Endosc 20:82–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lo CM, Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC, Wong J (1998) Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 227:461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalowski K, Bornman PC, Krige JE, Gallagher PJ, Terblanche J (1998) Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in patients with complicated acute cholecystitis or fibrosis. Br J Surg 85:904–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ouchi K, Mikuni J, Kakugawa Y Organizing Committee, the 30th Annual Congress of the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery (2002) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder carcinoma: results of a Japanese survey of 498 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:256–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Jani K, Shetty AR, Sendhilkumar K, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarthi R (2006) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: the role of subtotal cholecystectomy and its variants. J Am Coll Surg 203:145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, Rouge C, Duplessis R, Cervi C, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. A prospective comparative study in patients with acute vs. chronic cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 14:358–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ransom KJ (1998) Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis with subtotal cholecystectomy. Am Surg 64:955–957

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Serralta AS, Bueno JL, Planells MR, Rodero DR (2003) Prospective evaluation of emergency versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for early cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suter M, Meyer A (2001) A 10-year experience with the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe? Surg Endosc 15:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe Y, Sato M, Abe Y, Iseki S, Sato N, Kimura S (1996) Preceding PTGBD decreases complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute suppurative cholecystitis. J Laparoendosc Surg 6:161–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Kitagawa Y, Katohno Y, Sasaya T, Takara D, Nagino M, Nimura Y (2005) Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobillary Pancreat Surg 12:391–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Horiuchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horiuchi, A., Watanabe, Y., Doi, T. et al. Delayed laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis with severe fibrotic adhesions. Surg Endosc 22, 2720–2723 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9879-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9879-y

Keywords

Navigation