Skip to main content
Log in

Neuronal networks underlying the conjoint modulation of response selection by subliminal and consciously induced cognitive conflicts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Brain Structure and Function Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior has been shown to be affected by consciously and subliminally induced conflicts. Both types of conflict conjointly modulate behavioral performance, but the underlying neuronal mechanisms have remained unclear. While cognitive control is linked to oscillations in the theta frequency band, there are several mechanisms via which theta oscillations may enable cognitive control: via the coordination and synchronization of a large and complex neuronal network and/or via local processes within the medial frontal cortex. We, therefore, investigated this issue with a focus on theta oscillations and the underlying neuronal networks. For this purpose, n = 40 healthy young participants performed a conflict paradigm that combines conscious and subliminal distractors while an EEG was recorded. The data show that separate processes modulate the theta-based activation and organization of cognitive control networks: EEG beamforming analyses showed that variations in theta band power generated in the supplementary motor area reflected the need for control and task-relevant goal shielding, as both conflicts as well as their conjoint effect on behavior increased theta power. Yet, large networks were not modulated by this and graph theoretical analyses of the efficiency (i.e. small worldness) of theta-driven networks did not reflect the need for control. Instead, theta network efficiency was decreased by subliminal conflicts only. This dissociation suggests that while both kinds of conflict require control and goal shielding, which are induced by an increase in theta band power and modulate processes in the medial frontal cortex, only non-conscious conflicts diminish the efficiency of theta-driven large-scale networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SFB940 B8 to A.S. and C.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann-Kathrin Stock.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Each participant gave a written informed consent and was reimbursed with either 25€ or course credits for taking part in the study. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine of TU Dresden and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 789 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bensmann, W., Zink, N., Mückschel, M. et al. Neuronal networks underlying the conjoint modulation of response selection by subliminal and consciously induced cognitive conflicts. Brain Struct Funct 224, 1697–1709 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01866-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01866-0

Keywords

Navigation