Abstract
A submacroscopic anatomical investigation of the entire autonomic cardiac nervous system, from origin to peripheral distribution, was performed by examining 36 sides of 18 adult human cadavers under a stereomicroscope. The following new results and points of discussion were obtained: (1) The superior cervical, the middle cervical, the vertebral, and the cervicothoracic (stellate) ganglia, composed of the inferior cervical and 1st thoracic ganglia, were mostly consistent among the specimens. (2) The superior, middle, and inferior cardiac nerves innervated the heart by simply following the descent of the great arteries. In contrast, the thoracic cardiac nerve in the posterior mediastinum followed a complex course because of the long distance to the middle mediastinum. (3) The actual course of the right thoracic cardiac nerve differed from that of the previous descriptions in that it ascended obliquely or ran transversely to the vertebrae, regardless of the intercostal vessels. Regarding the right thoracic cardiac nerve, two descending courses were observed: the descent of the right thoracic cardiac nerve via the azygos vein and right venous porta, and the descent of the recurrent right thoracic cardiac nerve via the aorta. (4) The cranial cardiac nerve and branch tended to distribute into the heart medially, and the caudal cardiac nerve and branch tended to distribute into the heart laterally. (5) The mixing positions (cardiac plexus) of the sympathetic cardiac nerve and the vagal cardiac branch, as well as the definitive morphology of brachial arteries with the recurrent laryngeal nerves, tended to differ on both sides. These new and detailed anatomical descriptions of the human autonomic cardiac nervous system may provide important clues regarding the morphogenesis of autonomic cardiac nerves in addition to contributing to the improvement of cardiac surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Most of the anatomical research on the cardiac autonomic nerve system has been fragmentary because of the long course from the origin to the target. Therefore, most macroscopic anatomical studies on autonomic cardiac nerves have been limited to either the sympathetic or parasympathetic nervous systems only. Studies on sympathetic nerves have usually been divided into two types: research on the proximal part from the spinal nerves to the sympathetic ganglia (Axford 1927–1928; Becker and Grunt 1957; Harman 1900; Hoffman 1957; Jamieson et al. 1952; Kuntz 1946; Mitchell 1953; Pick and Sheehan 1946; White and Smithwick 1952; Wrete 1959) and research on the distal part from the sympathetic ganglia to the visceral nerves (Ellison and Williams 1962; Fukuyama 1982; Hausmann 1956; Janes et al. 1986; Kuntz and Morehouse 1930; Mizeres 1963; Mitchell 1953; Pick 1970). Dissecting the entire course from origin to peripheral distribution seems to have been difficult.
Until now, comparative anatomical studies on the entire sympathetic cardiac nerve have been performed to clarify the efferent pathway from the spinal cord to the heart (Kawashima et al. 2000, 2001), in addition to contributing to cardiovascular research (Kawashima et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2004, 2005).
Therefore, in this study I attempted a submacroscopic anatomical investigation to clarify the detailed morphology of the entire autonomic cardiac nerves, including both sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, by examining human cadavers using a binocular microscope.
Materials and methods
A submacroscopic anatomical analysis was performed to identify the origin, course, and peripheral distribution of the autonomic nerves to the heart using 36 sides of 18 embalmed adult human cadavers under a stereomicroscope. All cadavers were fixed by 10% formalin solution and preserved in 30% ethyl alcohol over 1 year, as well as being subjected to normal Japanese embalming procedures for student anatomical practice. Cadavers with clearly abnormal hearts and/or surrounding vessels were excluded from the analysis.
Decalcifying method
On six sides of three bodies, the relationships between the vertebral nerves and the spinal nerves were examined after decarbonization using the Plank-Rychlo solution (0.3 M aluminum chloride, 3% HCl, and 5% formic acid; Plank and Rychlo 1952) for 2 weeks. This solution is commonly used for decalcification in many laboratories. After decalcification, the specimens were decalcified with inorganic acid (10% nitric acid, 10% HCl, and K-CX solution) and neutralized by sodium sulfate for 12 h.
Staining method
The intrapericardium peripheral autonomic nerve distribution to the heart was examined using Sudan black stain. After careful examination of the origin and course of the autonomic cardiac nervous system, hearts with autonomic nerves were removed from the bodies. The specimens were kept overnight at room temperature in Sudan black solution (Sudan black B [Wako Pure Chemical, Japan] 5 g and 70% ethyl alcohol to make 1,000 ml).
Observation method
All dissections were examined under a stereomicroscope for operation (Olympus OME 5000). Major stages were recorded in detailed step-by-step drawings of lateral aspects in addition to the ventral aspect in order to preserve the relationships among the vessels, the nerves, and the surrounding structures. Consecutive dissection steps were documented by digital images using a Nikon digital camera.
The protocol for the present research did not include any specific issue requiring approval from the university ethics committees. The present work conformed to the provisions of the 1995 Declaration of Helsinki (revised in Edinburgh 2000).
Results
Sympathetic ganglia
The superior cervical ganglion was observed in all cases (100%), the middle cervical ganglion was observed on 33 sides (91.7%), and the vertebral ganglion was observed on 34 sides (94.4%). In addition, the accessory middle cervical ganglion and the fusion ganglion between the middle cervical and the vertebral ganglia were observed on 11 sides (30.6%) and on 2 sides (5.6%), respectively.
A single inferior cervical ganglion without fusion to the thoracic ganglia was present on 5 sides (13.9%, Fig. 1a), whereas most cases exhibited a cervicothoracic (stellate) ganglion (31 sides, 86.1%). The cervicothoracic ganglion was composed of the inferior cervical and the 1st thoracic ganglia on 30 sides (83.3%) and the inferior cervical, the 1st thoracic, and the 2nd thoracic ganglia on one side (2.8%).
The superior cervical ganglion was consistently positioned behind (medial) the bifurcation of the common carotid artery and between the 1st to 3rd cervical vertebrae, whereas the position of the middle cervical ganglion varied, being located in various portions of the sympathetic trunk between the 3rd and 7th cervical vertebrae. The vertebral ganglion was usually positioned on the ventral surface of the vertebral artery, usually joining between the anterior (ventral) and posterior (dorsal) roots of the ansa subclavius. The cervicothoracic ganglion was positioned between the 7th cervical and the 1st thoracic vertebrae, depending on the composition of the thoracic ganglia.
Communicating branches between sympathetic ganglia and spinal nerves
The superior cervical ganglion exhibited communicating branches with the spinal nerves on all sides (100%), communicating with the 1st cervical nerve (C1, 100%), C2 (100%), C3 (26/36 sides, 72.2%), and C4 (1/36 sides, 2.8%).
The middle cervical ganglion, observed on 33 sides, had communicating branches with the spinal nerves on 32 sides (97%), communicating with C3 (11/33 sides, 33.3%), C4 (29/33 sides, 87.9%), C5 (20/33 sides, 60.6%), and C6 (5/33 sides, 15.2%).
The vertebral ganglion, observed on 34 sides, had communicating branches with the spinal nerves on 10 sides (29.4%), communicating with C4 (1/10 sides, 10%), C5 (2/10 sides, 20%), C6 (3/10 sides, 30%), and C7 (6/10 sides, 60%).
The inferior cervical or the cervicothoracic ganglia had communicating branches with the spinal nerves on all sides (100%), communicating with C5 (2/36 sides, 5.6%), C6 (4/36 sides, 11.1%), C7 (27/36 sides, 75%), C8 (36/36 sides, 100%), T1 (36/36 sides, 100%), T2 (25/36 sides, 69.4%), and T3 (1/36 side, 2.8%). The ganglion communicating with T3 was a cervicothoracic ganglion composed of the inferior cervical, the 1st thoracic, and the 2nd thoracic ganglia.
Vertebral nerve
The vertebral nerve consisted of the nerve following the vertebral artery and entering into the foramen transversarium; a variety of origins for this nerve were observed.
None of the observed vertebral nerves originated from the middle cervical ganglion. However, one vertebral nerve originating from the fusion ganglion of the middle cervical and the vertebral ganglia was observed on one side, vertebral nerves from the vertebral ganglion on 26/34 sides (76.5%), and vertebral nerves from the inferior cervical or cervicothoracic ganglia on 34/36 sides (94.4%).
Next, the course of the vertebral nerve was traced by removing the bony elements after decarbonization on six sides of three necks. A peripheral nerve distribution analysis showed that the vertebral nerve communicated with the spinal nerves: with C5 (3/6 sides, 50%), C6 (6/6 sides, 100%), and C7 (6/6 sides, 100%).
Sympathetic cardiac nerves arising from sympathetic ganglia and trunk
In the present study, cardiac nerves were regarded as nerves with direct connections or connections via the cardiac plexus. Each cardiac nerve was named according to its origin as follows: superior cardiac nerves arose from the superior cervical ganglion and the sympathetic trunk between the superior and the middle cervical ganglia; middle cardiac nerves arose from the (accessory) middle cervical, the vertebral ganglia, and the sympathetic trunk between the middle and the inferior cervical ganglia, including the ansa subclavius; inferior cardiac nerves arose from the inferior cervical or the cervicothoracic ganglia; and thoracic cardiac nerves arose from the thoracic ganglia and the thoracic sympathetic trunk below the inferior cervical or the cervicothoracic ganglia.
The superior cardiac nerve originating from the superior cervical ganglion was observed on 32/36 sides (88.9%; 15 right sides, 17 left sides) and from the sympathetic trunk between the superior and the middle cervical ganglia on 25 sides (69.4%; 11 right sides, 14 left sides).
The middle cardiac nerve originating from the middle cervical ganglion was observed on 29/33 sides (87.8%; 13 right sides, 16 left sides), from the vertebral ganglion on 27/34 sides (79.4%; 15 right sides, 12 left sides), from the ansa subclavicla on 16/36 sides (44.4%; six right sides, 12 left sides), and from the sympathetic trunk between the middle and the inferior cervical ganglia on 10/36 sides (27.8%; four right sides, six left sides).
The inferior cardiac nerve originating from the inferior cervical or the cervicothoracic ganglia was observed on 27/36 sides (75%; 14 right sides, 13 left sides).
The thoracic cardiac nerve originating from the thoracic ganglia the thoracic sympathetic trunk under the inferior cervical or the cervicothoracic ganglia was observed on 21/36 sides (53.8%; seven right, 14 left sides).
The superior, middle, and inferior cardiac nerves usually followed the common carotid, subclavian, and brachiocephalic arteries, whereas the thoracic cardiac nerve and some of the inferior cardiac nerves descended obliquely along the thoracic vertebrae or the intercostal vessels, as shown in Figs. 1, 2, and 3. The right thoracic cardiac nerve, in particular, followed complicated courses. Two descending courses for the right thoracic cardiac nerve were observed. The first course descended obliquely along the intercostal vessels and entered into the right venous porta via the azygos arch (drainage portion of the azygos vein to the superior vena cava), as shown in Figs. 2 and 4b. The other course was more complex, descending obliquely along the intercostal vessels, arriving at the thoracic aorta around the 6th to 8th thoracic vertebrae, turning there, ascending along the aorta, and connecting to the cardiac plexus along the arterial nutritional branch of the right intercostal artery, as shown in Figs. 3 and 4a. Moreover, none of the right thoracic cardiac nerves ascended obliquely to the vertebrae, regardless of the intercostal vessels.
The left thoracic cardiac nerve descended obliquely along the left intercostal vessels, arriving at the aortic arch. Thereafter, the left thoracic cardiac nerve connected to the cardiac plexus or entered from the left venous porta through the ventral/dorsal aspect of the aorta.
Parasympathetic cardiac branches arising from vagus nerve
The vagal cardiac branches were regarded as nerves with direct connections or connections via the cardiac plexus, excluding branches of the lung or surrounding vessels and organs. Each cardiac branch was named according to the origin of the vagus nerve from a developmental viewpoint, as follows: superior cardiac branch, which arose from the vagus nerve at the level of the upper (proximal) portion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve; inferior cardiac branch, which arose from the recurrent laryngeal nerve; and thoracic cardiac branch, which arose from the vagus nerve at the level of the lower (distal) portion of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.
The superior cardiac branch was observed on all sides (100%; 18 right sides, 18 left sides), with one to five branches observed in each individual (average, 2.2 branches; 1.9 right branches, 2.5 left branches).
The inferior cardiac branch was also observed on all sides (100%; 18 right sides, 18 left sides), with one to four branches (average, 2.1 branches; 2.4 right branches, 1.9 left branches).
The thoracic cardiac branch was observed on 28/36 sides (77.8%; right 18 sides; left 10 sides), with one to five branches (average, 2.0 branches; 2.6 right branches, 1.4 left branches).
Anatomical relationship among cardiac nerves (sympathetic), branches (vagus), and the cardiac plexus
The cardiac plexus was composed of the complex bifurcations and anastomoses of the cardiac nerves and branches as shown in Figs. 3, 4a, and 4b. The positions of the mixed nerves (cardiac plexus) between the sympathetic cardiac nerves and vagal cardiac branches were examined and are shown in Table 1. On the right side, the highest observed position of the mixture nerve was at the level of the cervical part of the common carotid artery (right side of Fig.2), whereas the general position was at the brachiocephalic trunk (right side of Fig. 3). On the left side, the highest observed position of the mixture nerve was at the level of the cervical part of the common carotid artery (left side of Fig.3), whereas the general position was at the aortic arch (left side of Figs. 2 and 4a). Consequently, most of the mixture nerves between the sympathetic cardiac nerve and the vagal cardiac branch were consistent, although the highest position of the mixture nerve varied from one individual to another. The right cardiac plexus usually surrounded the brachiocephalic trunk, whereas the left cardiac plexus surrounded the aortic arch. Furthermore, the cardiac plexus surrounding the great vessels on both sides was made from a larger cardiac plexus between the aortic arch and the pulmonary arterial trunk through the ventral/dorsal aspect of the aortic arch.
On the right side, several nerves were observed passing through the dorsal, rather than the ventral, aspect of the aortic arch. On the left side, no differences between the ventral and dorsal courses to the aortic arch were observed.
In addition, the cranial cardiac nerves and branches tended to be distributed from a medial position and the caudal cardiac nerves and branches from a lateral position.
Intrapericardium peripheral autonomic nerve distribution to the heart
After examining the origin and course of the autonomic nerves overall, the autonomic nerves innervating the heart were examined in detail using whole-mount preparations stained with Sudan black solution. However, the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems innervating the heart could not be distinguished at the macroscopic level because of the cardiac plexus at the inlet/outlet level of the great vessels of the heart.
These mixtures of parasympathetic/sympathetic nerves branched or originated from the great cardiac plexus between the aortic arch and the pulmonary arterial trunk, coursed along the medial aspect of the aortic arch between the aortic arch and the pulmonary arterial trunk, and reached the coronary arteries (Fig. 5). Along the way, a number of branches from these mixture nerves were distributed directly to the atrium and the surrounding vessels and organs. The mixture nerves reaching the coronary arteries then descended, attached to the coronary arteries, and branched to the atria and ventricles.
Discussion
Sympathetic ganglia
Many anatomical studies on the communicating branches between the sympathetic ganglia and the spinal nerves have been published (Axford 1927–1928; Becker and Grunt 1957; Harman 1900; Hoffman 1957; Jamieson et al. 1952; Kuntz 1946; Mitchell 1953; Pick and Sheehan 1946; White and Smithwick 1952; Wrete 1959). These descriptions have been consistent and almost agree with the results here. The superior cervical and the cervicothoracic ganglia communicated with C1–3 and C7–8-T1–2, respectively. In humans, the cervicothoracic ganglia is always composed of the inferior cervical and only the 1st thoracic ganglia. On the other hand, the middle cervical and the vertebral ganglia are not constant with regard to size, position, and communicating branches with the spinal nerves. In other words, the superior cervical and the cervicothoracic ganglia are consistent, whereas the middle cervical and the vertebral ganglia are variable. Hoffmann (1957) and Pick (1970) mentioned that the latter two ganglia were generally small and that their ganglion cells could usually be found throughout the sympathetic trunk between the superior and the inferior cervical ganglia, even if they could not be readily observed. Verberne et al. (1999) clarified many things about the sympathetic cervical ganglia development using chick embryos. However, these results could not be applied to humans because there are many morphological differences between the species (Broek 1908).
To obtain a detailed understanding of the general morphology of the autonomic nervous system innervating the heart, comparative anatomical investigations are needed. In previous reports, the autonomic nervous distribution to the heart was examined in Japanese monkeys, Macaca fuscata (Kawashima and Sato 2000; Kawashima et al. 2001). In these studies, the cervicothoracic ganglion was usually composed of the inferior cervical, the 1st thoracic, and the 2nd thoracic ganglia (16/20 sides, 80.0%), but rarely only of the 1st thoracic ganglion (1/20 sides, 5.0%) and sometimes the 1st to 3rd thoracic ganglia (3/20 sides, 15.0%), in addition to the inferior cervical ganglion in the Japanese monkey, M. fuscata. On the other hand, the human cervicothoracic ganglion almost always consisted of the inferior cervical and only the 1st thoracic ganglia (30/36 sides, 83.3%). A single inferior cervical ganglion without the thoracic ganglion fusion was also observed in five sides (13.9%) in humans. Additionally, the positions of the cervicothoracic and the middle cervical ganglia in the Japanese monkey, M. fuscata, were compared with those in humans. In humans, the positions of these ganglia were higher (cranial) than those in Japanese monkeys. Therefore, comparative anatomical differences are likely related to evolution, and further comparative anatomical examinations using various primates will be required in the future.
From which did the vertebral ganglion derive—the inferior or the middle cervical ganglion?
Several authors have discussed the position and origin of the vertebral ganglion. Some authors have insisted that the vertebral ganglion should be regarded as being independent from other cervical ganglia because the characteristics of the vertebral ganglion are relatively consistent and appear at a higher frequency than those of the middle cervical ganglion (Mitchell 1953; Becker and Grunt 1957).
Whether the vertebral ganglion should be classified with other cervical ganglia or as accessory ganglia has been a subject of debate. One argument states that the vertebral ganglion belonged to or originated from the middle cervical ganglion (Axford 1927–1928; Woollard and Norrish 1933; Wrete 1959), while the other argument states that the vertebral ganglion belonged to or originated from the inferior cervical ganglion (Lazorthes and Cassan 1939; Guerrier 1944).
To shed light on this question, the morphology of the vertebral nerve was examined. Some vertebral nerves were found on one side; these vertebral nerves were derived from the cervicothoracic ganglion on 34/36 sides (94.4%), the vertebral ganglion on 26/34 (76.5) sides in which a vertebral ganglion was present, and the fusion ganglion between the middle cervical and the vertebral ganglia on 1/33 sides (3%). Therefore, the vertebral ganglion might originally derive from the inferior cervical or the upper part of the cervicothoracic ganglia, with part of a secondary component differentiating into the vertebral ganglion. The vertebral ganglion was regarded as being close to the cervicothoracic ganglion, and it did not usually communicate with the spinal nerves.
Developmental studies also seem to support the above hypothesis (Fernoholm 1971; Gomez 1958; His 1897; Kuntz 1946; Mitchell 1953; Pick 1970; Sharner 1930; Verberne et al. 1999). According to these earlier studies, the sympathetic trunk was initially generated in the thoracolumbar region. Next, the cervical and sacral regions of the sympathetic trunk were generated from the thoracolumbar sympathetic trunk. In view of the relationship between the present results and developmental findings, it is highly possible that the vertebral ganglion differentiates from the inferior cervical or the upper part of the cervicothoracic ganglia rather than the middle cervical ganglion. To clarify the complete differentiation of the vertebral ganglion, it would be necessary to use high primates or human embryos for investigation because no animal except adult primates has the vertebral ganglion.
Sympathetic cardiac nerves
Although many studies on cardiac nerves have been published (Ellison and Williams 1962; Fukuyama 1982; Hausmann 1956; Janes et al. 1986; Kuntz and Morehouse 1930; Mizeres 1963; Mitchell 1953; Pick 1970), their descriptions have varied regarding the origins of the nerves.
The opinion that the middle cardiac nerve originates mainly from the middle cervical and the vertebral ganglia is consistent with the present results (Mitchell 1953; Ellison and Williams 1962 Fukuyama 1982). However, the limits of cardiac nerve origin, namely the upper limit of the superior cardiac nerve and the lower limit of the thoracic cardiac nerve, differ among authors.
In phylogeny, the superior cardiac nerve is present only in humans (Broek 1908; Perman 1924; Schumacher 1902). Although the origin of the superior cardiac nerve from the superior cervical ganglion has been described as a defect in humans, a few authors have insisted that this situation exists (Ellison 1962, 83.3% on both sides; Fukuyama 1982, 93.8% on right, 100% on left). It is very difficult to trace the peripheral distribution of the superior cardiac nerve in addition to the courses that run behind the common carotid artery covered by the carotid sheath. Whether these cardiac nerves really reached the heart remained uncertain. In the present detailed analysis performed under a binocular stereomicroscope, however, the superior cardiac nerve was observed at a high frequency (88.9%), and its entire course from origin to peripheral distribution was successfully traced.
Although most authors have described a difference in the superior cardiac nerve between the left and right sides, the present observations showed no differences in frequency. However, right three sides did not have the superior cardiac nerve originating from the superior cervical ganglion or the cervical sympathetic trunk between the superior and the middle cervical ganglia. Therefore, although an apparent difference between the right and left sides was not observed, the frequency of the right superior cardiac nerve might be slightly less than the left.
The lower limit of the human thoracic cardiac nerve has also been discussed by many authors (Braeucker 1927). The lower limit of the thoracic cardiac nerve has been reported to be the 1st thoracic ganglion (Cruveilhier 1852; Hirschfeld 1866; Sappy 1889; Shinozaki 1929–1930), the 1st to 2nd thoracic ganglia (Müller 1924), the upper thoracic ganglia (Valentin 1843; Meckel 1817; Swan 1834; Bourgery 1844), the 4th thoracic ganglion (Mitchell 1953; Mizeres 1963), the 5th thoracic ganglion (Ellison 1962; Kuntz and Morehouse 1930), and the 7th thoracic ganglion (Saccomanno 1943). According to Fukuyama (1982), the limit is different between the right and left sides: the 5th and the 4th thoracic ganglia, respectively. The course of the lower thoracic cardiac nerve has been represented as running transversely through the thoracic vertebra, regardless of the course of the intercostal vessels, by Kuntz and Morehouse (1930). Moreover, Mitchell (1953) and Saccomanno (1943) represented the lower origin (5th to 7th thoracic ganglia) of the thoracic ganglia as ascending across the intercostal vessels to reach the heart at a position higher than the origin of the thoracic cardiac nerve. However, neither the ascending thoracic cardiac nerves nor the transversal thoracic cardiac nerves were observed in the present study.
A different course for the thoracic cardiac nerve has been reported in the Japanese monkey, M. fuscata (Kawashima et al. 2001). The thoracic cardiac nerve arose from the right 4th and 5th thoracic ganglia and descended obliquely along the intercostal vessels. After arriving at the thoracic aorta at the level of the 7th or 8th thoracic vertebra, the thoracic cardiac nerve turned and ascended along the aorta, finally entering from the left venous porta and innervating the left atrium and ventricle. The reason for this complex course was uncertain, but the existence of this complex course might be important and may be a potential course for the innervation of the human heart because a similar complex course was observed in 4/18 human right sides. The thoracic cardiac nerve might act as a right recurrent thoracic cardiac nerve in humans.
The superior, middle, and inferior cardiac nerves innervated the heart by following a simple course along the brachiocephalic trunk, common carotid, and subclavian arteries. On the other hand, the thoracic cardiac nerve, situated in the posterior mediastinum, had to follow a complex course because of the long distance to the heart in the middle mediastinum.
Additionally, a left thoracic cardiac nerve was observed on 14/18 sides (77.8%), whereas a right thoracic cardiac nerve was observed only on 7/18 sides (38.9%). The left thoracic cardiac nerve may have easily reached the heart because of the presence of the left aortic arch. However, the right thoracic cardiac nerve had to follow a complex course, requiring a longer distance to reach the heart because of the disappearance of the corresponding structure on the right side. Therefore, the roundabout course of the right thoracic cardiac nerve should be recognized as a collateral route for cardiac nerves.
Parasympathetic cardiac branches
Various names for the vagal cardiac branches have been proposed. Perman (1924) defined the cardiac branches arising from the vagus nerve cranial to the thoracic outlet as “Rr. cardiaci superiores” and those caudal to the thoracic outlet as “Rr. cardiaci inferiores.”
Mitchell (1953) divided the vagal cardiac branches into three groups: superior, middle, and inferior, arising from the vagus nerve in the upper half of the neck, the lower half of the neck, and the thorax, respectively.
Mizeres (1963) defined the cardiac branches arising from the vagus nerve until the lower border of the 6th cervical vertebra as the cervical cardiac branches, the cardiac branches from the vagus nerve between the 7th cervical and 1st thoracic vertebra as the cervicothoracic cardiac branches, and the cardiac branches from the vagus nerve caudal to the lower border of the 1st thoracic vertebra as the thoracic cardiac branches. These definitions were used for branches on both the right and left sides.
Tanaka et al. (1998) categorized the cardiac branches into arterial porta-related and venous-related groups based on their destination. Although they distinguished between right and left branches and paid attention to the developmental viewpoint, their definitions of the cardiac branches were too complex to be used practically.
Hausmann’s (1956) definitions may be the best and simplest way of describing differences between the right and left sides.
Several meaningful differences exist between the right and left thoracic cardiac branches. If branches to the lung are included in the term “cardiopulmonary branch,” the number of branches should be almost symmetrical. If this term is limited to the branches leading to the heart, however, the left and right sides will differ because the branching range of the left thoracic cardiac branch is very short compared with the right one.
Peripheral autonomic nervous distribution to the heart
The present observations clarified the main autonomic nerves descending into the arterial porta: superior cardiac nerve, middle cardiac nerve, inferior cardiac nerve, superior cardiac branch, and inferior cardiac branch. Cardiac nerves/branches were mainly observed running between the aortic arch and the pulmonary arterial trunk and innervating the heart along the coronary arteries. Additionally, fine nerve fibers entering from the venous porta and transverse and oblique sinuses of the pericardium were also observed. These results agree with the histochemical studies of Woollard (1925–1926) and Souza et al. (1996). According to Souza et al. (1996), the rat cardiac ganglia are regularly found in certain locations, namely, cranial to the pulmonary veins (44% of total), cranial and to the left of the superior vena cava (10%), in the interatrial groove (21%), to the left of the left pulmonary vein (11%), caudal to the pulmonary veins (12%), and in the wall of the coronary sinus (1%); the cardiac ganglia are not found on the auricular appendages. Pauza et al. (2000) analyzed the human cardiac ganglia and their connections/subplexuses in detail using a histochemical method. According to their results, the topography of epicardiac subplexuses was consistent from heart to heart. These human epicardiac neural plexuses are more or less associated with protuberances and/or grooves of the heart wall: coronary, interatrial, interventricular, and, their discovery, epicardiac nerve routes. These results describing the location of the cardiac ganglia correspond with the present results regarding the cardiac nerve/plexus. Both macroscopic and molecular analyses will be useful and necessary for unifying and resolving a more complete morphology in the future.
Morphogenesis of autonomic cardiac nerve from viewpoint of macroscopic anatomy
Tanaka et al. (1998) described and defined the cardiac branches in the Suncus from a developmental viewpoint and indicated that only the vagal cardiac branches exhibited a symmetrical developmental structure.
The present report described the anatomical architecture of the sympathetic cardiac nerves in addition to the vagal cardiac branches. In particular, the mixing position of the sympathetic cardiac nerves and vagal cardiac branches was asymmetrical in adults, whereas their positions were symmetrical from the developmental viewpoint. Moreover, although both sides of the autonomic cardiac nerves ran through the ventral/dorsal aspect of the aortic arch, the right autonomic cardiac nerves tended to follow a ventral course. Hirakow (1987), Ogawa (1952), and Shinozaki (1929–1930) also described this feature and suggested a relationship with the shift in the left ventricle from a left-lateral to ventral position. In addition, a series of embryological researches by Verberne et al. (1998, 2000a, 2000b) revealed much about autonomic nerve differentiations from the neural crest using the chick embryo. In their papers, they showed a difference in distribution between the right- and left-sided cardiac neural crest cells at the arterial pole and ventral cardiac plexus, whereas the right and left cardiac neural crest cells mixed in the dorsal cardiac plexus.
During the morphogenesis of the autonomic nerves to the heart, the vagal cardiac branches initially extend to the heart along the branchial arches, followed by the disappearance of the branchial arches, arteries, and organs. Thereafter, the sympathetic cardiac nerves secondarily extend to the heart, forming the cardiac plexus when the morphogenesis of the branchial arteries is nearly complete (Sharner 1930; Gomez 1958; Kuratani et al. 1991; Roberts 1991). Interestingly, the mixing positions (cardiac plexus) of the sympathetic cardiac nerve and the vagal cardiac branch, as well as the definitive morphology of brachial arteries with the recurrent laryngeal nerves, tended to differ on the two sides.
References
Axford MB (1927–1928) Some observations on the cervical sympathetic in man. J Anat 62:301–318
Becker RF, Grunt JA (1957) The cervical sympathetic ganglia. Anat Rec 127:1–14
Bourgery IM (1844) Traité complet de l’anatomie de l’homme. C.-A. Delaunay, Paris (cited in Braeucker 1927)
Braeucker W (1927) Der Brustteil des vegetativen Nervensystems. Beiträge zur Klinik der Tuberkulose 66:1–65
Broek AJP (1908) Untersuchungen über den Bau des sympathischen Nervensystem der Säugetiere. 1 Der Halssympathicus. Morphol Jahrb 37:202–288
Cruveilhier J (1852) Traité d’anatomie descriptive, vol 4. Labé, Paris (cited in Braeucker 1927)
Ellison JP, Williams TH (1962) Sympathetic nerve pathways to the human heart, and their variations. Am J Anat 124:149–162
Fernoholm M (1971) On the development of the sympathetic chain and the adrenal medulla in the mouse. Z Anat Entwickl 133:305–317
Fukuyama U (1982) Gross anatomy of the extrinsic cardiac nerve branches of human beings. Acta Anat Nippon 57:357–380 [in Japanese]
Gomez H (1958) The development of the innervation of the heart in the rat embryo. Anat Rec 130:53–71
Guerrier Y (1944) Le sympathique cervical. Imprem de la Charité, Montpellier, p 245 (cited in Wrete 1959)
Harman NB (1900) The anterior limit of the cervico-thoracic visceral efferent nerves in man. J Anat Physiol 34:359–391
Hausmann E (1956) Über die Anatomie der Herznerven. Z Anat Entwickl 119:263–279
Hirakow R (1987) A basic pattern of the cardiac nerves in vertebrates. Brain Nerve 39:417–423 [in Japanese]
Hirschfeld L (1866) Traité et iconographie du systéme nerveux. Masson, Paris (cited in Braeucker 1927)
His Jr (1897) Über die Entwickelung des Bauchsympathicus beim Hühnchen und Menschen. Arch Anat Physiol Suppl:137–170
Hoffmann HH (1957) An analysis of the sympathetic trunk and rami in the cervicula and upper thoracic regions in man. Ann Surg 145:94–107
Jamieson RW, Smith DB, Anson BJ (1952) The cervical sympathetic ganglia—an anatomical study of 100 cervico-thoracic dissections. Quart Bull Northwestern Univ Med Sch 26:219–227
Janes RD, Brandys JC, Hopkins DA, Johnstone DE, Murphy DA, Armour JA (1986) Anatomy of human extrinsic cardiac nerve and ganglia. Am J Cardiol 57:299–309
Kawashima T, Sasaki H (2003b) The morphological significance of the human sinuatrial nodal branch. Heart Vessels 18:213–219
Kawashima T, Sasaki H (2004) Anatomical comparison of a defect in the hepatic segment of the inferior vena cava with the normal azygos system. Eur J Anat 8:71–79
Kawashima T, Sasaki H (2005) A macroscopic anatomical investigation of atrioventricular bundle locational variation relative to the membranous part of the ventricular septum in elderly human hearts. Surg Radiol Anat February 19 [Epub ahead of print]
Kawashima T, Sato K (2000) Morphological analysis of sympathetic cardiac nerves in the Japanese monkey and man. Autonomic Nerv Sys 37:521–531 [in Japanese with English abstract]
Kawashima T, Sato K, Sasaki H (2001) An anomalous case of the thoracic cardiac nerve in the Japanese monkey. Acta Anat Nippon 76:399–406 [in Japanese with English abstract]
Kawashima T, Sato K, Sato F, Sasaki H (2003a) An anatomical study of the human cardiac veins with special reference to the drainage of the great cardiac vein. Ann Anat 185:535–542
Kuntz A, Morehouse A (1930) Thoracic cardiac nerves in man. Arch Surg 20:607–613
Kuntz A (1946) The autonomic nervous system, 3rd edn. Baillière, Tindall & Cox, London
Kuratani SC, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Kirby M (1991) Development of cranial nerves in the chick embryo with special reference to the alterations of cardiac branches after ablation of the cardiac neural crest. Anat Embryol 183:501–514
Lazorthes G, Cassan L (1939) Essai de schématisation des ganglions étoilé et intermédiaire (ganglion cervico-thoracique) d’après 80 dissections chez l’adulte et chez le foetus. Bull Ass Anat 49:193–210
Meckel JF (1817) Handbuch der menschlichen Anatomie. Halle, Berlin (cited in Braeucker 1927)
Mitchell GAG (1953) Anatomy of the autonomic nervous system. ES Livingstone, London
Mizeres NJ (1963) The cardiac plexus in man. Am J Anat 112:141–152
Müller LR (1924) Die Lebensnerven, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin New York, pp 141–168
Ogawa T (1952) On the cardiac nerve of some cetacea, with special reference to those of Berardius bairdii Stejneger. Whales Research Inst 12:1–22
Pauza DH, Skripka V, Pauziene N, Stropus R (2000) Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicardiac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart. Anat Rec 259:353–382
Perman E (1924) Anatomische Untersuchung über die Herznerven bei den hoheren Säugetieren und bei Menschen. Z Anat Entwickl 71:382–457
Pick J (1970) The autonomic nervous system. Morphological, comparative, clinical and surgical aspects. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Pick J, Sheehan D (1946) Sympathetic rami in man. J Anat 80:12–20
Plank VJ, Rychlo A (1952) Eine schnellentkalkungsmethode. Zbl Pathol 89:252–254
Roberts LA (1991) Morphological innervation pattern of the developing rabbit heart. Am J Anat 190:370–384
Saccomanno G (1943) The components of the upper thoracic sympathetic nerves. J Comp Neurol 79:355–378
Sappy PC (1889) Traité d’anatomie descriptive. V.-A. Delahaye & Cie, Paris (cited in Braeucker 1927)
Schumacher SV (1902) Die Herznerven der Säugetiere und des Menschen. Sitz Ber Kaiserl Akad Wiss 111:3
Sharner RF (1930) On the development of the nerves to the mammalian heart. Anat Rec 46:23–39
Shinozaki S (1929–1930) Human cardiac nerves. Acta Anat Nippon 2:399–425 [in Japanese]
Souza RR, Gama EF, Carvalho CAF, Liberti EA (1996) Quantitative study and architecture of nerves and ganglia of the rat heart. Acta Anat 156:53–60
Swan J (1834) A demonstration of the nerves of the human body. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, London (cited in Braeucker 1927)
Tanaka S, Nakatani T, Mizukami S, Yasui K, Uemura M, Lee HY, Chung IH (1998) Branches of the vagus nerve destined for the heart and the adjoining great vessels in the house shrew, Suncus murinus, with reference to the terminology of the vagal cardiac branches. Acta Anat Nippon 73:141–156
Valentin G (1843) Hirn- und Nervenlehre. Leopold Voss, Leipzig (cited in Braeucker 1927)
Verberne ME, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Poelmann RE (1998) Lineage and development of the parasympathetic nervous system of the embryonic chick heart. Anat Embryol 198:171–184
Verberne ME, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Iperen LV, Poelmann RE (1999) Contribution of the cervical sympathetic ganglia to the innervation of the pharyngeal arch arteries and the heart in the chick embryo. Anat Rec 255:407–419
Verberne ME, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Iperen LV, Poelmann RE (2000a) Distribution of antigen epitopes shared by nerves and the myocardium of the embryonic chick heart using different neuronal markers. Anat Rec 260:335–350
Verberne ME, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Iperen LV, Poelmann RE (2000b) Distribution of different regions of cardiac neural crest in the extrinsic and intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Dev Dyn 217:191–204
White JC, Smithwick RH (1952) The autonomic nervous system, 2nd edn. Macmillan, New York
Woollard HH (1925–1926) The innervation of the heart. J Anat 60:345–373
Woollard HH, Norrish RE (1933) The anatomy of the peripheral sympathetic nervous system. Br J Surg 21:83–103
Wrete M (1959) The anatomy of the sympathetic trunk in man. J Anat 93:448–459
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the Japan Foundation of Cardiovascular Research (2003) and Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports Science and Technology (No. 16790804). The author wishes to thank Prof. Hiroshi Sasaki of Tokyo Women’s Medical University and Prof. Kenji Sato of Tokyo Medical and Dental University for their valuable criticism and advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kawashima, T. The autonomic nervous system of the human heart with special reference to its origin, course, and peripheral distribution. Anat Embryol 209, 425–438 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0462-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-005-0462-1