Skip to main content
Log in

Role of imaging in the follow-up of T2–T3 glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An unblinded retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out on 138 patients affected by glottic pT2 and selected pT3 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) treated by transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). The entire cohort was divided into two groups: Group A included 78 “high-risk” patients (pT2 with impaired vocal cord mobility, pT3 for anterior paraglottic and/or pre-epiglottic space invasion, presence of angioembolization, perineural spread, and positive lymph nodes in the neck) who underwent postoperative surveillance by endoscopy and imaging (CT or MR), while Group B included 60 “low-risk” patients (pT2 with absence of the above-mentioned features) who underwent endoscopic follow-up alone. Aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic gain in performing combined endoscopic and radiologic surveillance in the “high-risk” group compared to endoscopy alone in the “low-risk” one. There was no significant difference in terms of overall and disease-specific survivals between the two follow-up policies in spite of their different risk profiles. The same was true for organ preservation rate, which was 81% in the “high-risk” and 89% in the “low-risk” group. In contrast, the cumulative probability of disease-free survival was 54% for Group A and 65% for Group B (p = 0.0023). Therefore, our combined endoscopy and imaging surveillance protocol allowed increasing the submucosal recurrence detection rate in “high-risk” pT2–pT3 glottic SCC to 43%. An earlier detection of submucosal recurrences made salvage surgery by TLM feasible in at least half of cases, thus closing the gap between oncologic outcomes obtained in “high-”- vs. “low-risk” patients and leading to organ preservation rates that are favorably comparable to those obtained with open-neck partial laryngectomies and non-surgical organ preservation protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vilaseca I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Luis Blanch J (2010) Transoral laser microsurgery for T3 laryngeal tumors: prognostic factors. Head Neck 32:929–938

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peretti G, Piazza C, Bolzoni A, Mensi MC, Rossini M, Parrinello G, Shapshay SM, Antonelli AR (2004) Analysis of recurrences in 322 Tis, T1, or T2 glottic carcinomas treated by carbon dioxide laser. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 113:853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garofolo S, Piazza C, Del Bon F, Mangili S, Guastini L, Mora F, Nicolai P, Peretti G (2015) Intraoperative narrow band imaging better delineates superficial resection margins during transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 124:294–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fakhry N, Vergez S, Babin E, Baumstarck K, Santini L, Dessi P, Giovanni A (2015) Management of surgical margins after endoscopic laser surgery for early glottic cancers: a multicentric evaluation in French-speaking European countries. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:1465–1469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piazza C, Mangili S, Bon FD, Paderno A, Grazioli P, Barbieri D, Perotti P, Garofolo S, Nicolai P, Peretti G (2014) Preoperative clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure for microlaryngoscopy: the Laryngoscore. Laryngoscope 124:2561–2567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peretti G, Piazza C, Cocco D, De Benedetto L, Del Bon F et al (2010) Transoral CO2 laser treatment for Tis-T3 glottic cancer: the University of Brescia experience on 595 patients. Head Neck 32:977–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simo R, Bradley P, Chevalier D, Dikkers F, Eckel H, Matar N, Peretti G, Piazza C, Remacle M, Quer M (2014) European Laryngological Society: ELS recommendations for the follow-up of patients treated for laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:2469–2479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravanelli M, Farina D, Rizzardi P, Botturi E, Prandolini P, Mangili S, Peretti G, Nicolai P, Maroldi R (2013) MR with surface coils in the follow-up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma: feasibility and diagnostic accuracy. Neuroradiology 55:225–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, Müller M (2011) pROC: an open-source package for R and S + to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinform 12:77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A, Brasnu D, Chevalier D, Friedrich G, Olofsson J, Rudert HH, Thumfart W, de Vincentiis M, Wustrow TP (2000) Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee. European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Remacle M, Van Haverbeke C, Eckel H, Bradley P, Chevalier D, Djukic V, de Vicentiis M, Friedrich G, Olofsson J, Peretti G, Quer M, Werner J (2007) Proposal for revision of the European Laryngological Society classification of endoscopic cordectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:499–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ansarin M, Cattaneo A, De Benedetto L, Zorzi S, Lombardi F, Alterio D, Rocca MC, Scelsi D, Preda L, Chiesa F, Santoro L (2017) Retrospective analysis of factors influencing oncologic outcome in 590 patients with early-intermediate glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery. Head Neck 39:71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peretti G, Piazza C, Penco S, Santori G, Del Bon F, Garofolo S, Paderno A, Guastini L, Nicolai P (2016) Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for selected T3 glottic and supraglottic cancers. Head Neck 38:1107–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peretti G, Piazza C, Mora F, Garofolo S, Guastini L (2016) Reasonable limits for transoral laser microsurgery in laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 24:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tibbetts KM, Tan M (2015) Role of advanced laryngeal imaging in glottic cancer: early detection and evaluation of glottic neoplasms. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 48:565–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Becker M, Burkhardt K, Dulguerov P, Allal A (2008) Imaging of the larynx and hypopharynx. Eur J Radiol 66:460–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Joshi VM, Wadhwa V, Mukherji SK (2012) Imaging in laryngeal cancers. Indian J Radiol Imaging 22:209–226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Maroldi R, Ravanelli M, Farina D (2014) Magnetic resonance for laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 22:131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hermans R (2004) Post-treatment imaging of head and neck cancer. Cancer Imaging 12;4 Spec No A:S6–S15

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesare Piazza.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding has been received for the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this manuscript was conceived and written by the cited authors. They do not have to disclose financial information and they confirm no conflict of interest concerning this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marchi, F., Piazza, C., Ravanelli, M. et al. Role of imaging in the follow-up of T2–T3 glottic cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 3679–3686 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4642-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4642-4

Keywords

Navigation