Skip to main content
Log in

Management of surgical margins after endoscopic laser surgery for early glottic cancers: a multicentric evaluation in French-speaking European countries

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the practices of ENT surgeons for the management of surgical margins after endoscopic laser surgery for early glottic cancers. A questionnaire was sent to different surgeons managing cancers of the larynx in France, Belgium and Switzerland. A descriptive and comparative analysis of practices across centers was performed. Sixty-nine surgeons completed the questionnaire (58 in France, 10 in Belgium and 1 in Switzerland). In case of very close or equivocal resection margins after definitive histological examination, 67 % of surgeons perform close follow-up, 28 % further treatment and 5 % had no opinion. Factors resulting in a significant change in the management of equivocal or very close margins were: the country of origin (p = 0.011), the specialty of the multidisciplinary team leader (p = 0.001), the fact that radiation equipment is located in the same center (p = 0.027) and the access to IMRT technique (p = 0.027). In case of positive resection margins, 80 % of surgeons perform further treatment, 15 % surveillance, and 5 % had no opinion. The only factor resulting in a significant change in the management of positive margins was the number of cancers of the larynx treated per year (p = 0.011). It is important to spare, on one hand equivocal or very close margins and on the other hand, positive margins. Postoperative management should be discussed depending on intraoperative findings, patient, practices of multidisciplinary team, and surgeon experience. This management remains non-consensual and writing a good practice guideline could be useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones AS, Fish B, Fenton JE et al (2004) The treatment of early laryngeal cancers (T1-T2 N0): surgery or irradiation? Head Neck 26:127–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mendenhall WM, Werning JW, Hinerman RW et al (2004) Management of T1-T2 glottic carcinomas. Cancer 100:1786–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fakhry N, Vergez S, Baumstarck K et al (2015) Multicentric evaluation of strategies for treatment of T1a glottic carcinomas. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallo A, de Vincentiis M, Manciocco V et al (2002) CO2 laser cordectomy for early-stage glottic carcinoma: a long-term follow-up of 156 cases. Laryngoscope 112:370–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sigston E, de Mones E, Babin E et al (2006) Early-stage glottic cancer oncological results and margins in laser cordectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:147–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Michel J, Fakhry N, Duflo S, Lagier A, Mancini J, Dessi P, Giovanni A (2011) Prognostic value of the status of resection margins after endoscopic laser cordectomy for T1a glottic carcinoma. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 128:297–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peretti G, Nicolai P, De Zinis LOR et al (2000) Endoscopic CO2 laser excision for Tis, T1, and T2 glottic carcinomas: cure rate and prognostic factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:124–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crespo AN, Chone CT, Gripp FM et al (2006) Role of margin status in recurrence after CO2 laser endoscopic resection of early glottis cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 126:306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mortuaire G, Francois J, Wiel E et al (2006) Local recurrence after CO2 laser cordectomy for early glottic carcinoma. Laryngoscope 116:101–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Remacle M, Matar N, Delos M et al (2010) Is frozen section reliable in transoral CO2 laser-assisted cordectomies? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:397–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fang TJ, Courey MS, Liao CT, Yen TC, Li HY (2013) Frozen margin analysis as a prognosis predictor in early glottic cancer by laser cordectomy. Laryngoscope 123:1490–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jackel MC, Ambrosch P, Martin A et al (2007) Impact of re-resection for inadequate margins on the prognosis of upper aerodigestive tract cancer treated by laser microsurgery. Laryngoscope 117:350–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Preuss SF, Cramer K, Drebber U, Klussmann JP, Eckel HE, Guntinas-Lichius O (2009) Second-look microlaryngoscopy to detect residual carcinoma in patients after laser surgery for T1 and T2 laryngeal cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 129:881–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peretti G, Piazza C, Cocco D et al (2010) Transoral CO2 laser treatment for T-is-T-3 glottic cancer: the University of Brescia experience on 595 patients. Head Neck 32:977–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest or financial disclosure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Fakhry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fakhry, N., Vergez, S., Babin, E. et al. Management of surgical margins after endoscopic laser surgery for early glottic cancers: a multicentric evaluation in French-speaking European countries. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 1465–1469 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3547-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3547-3

Keywords

Navigation