Investigation of aspiration: milk nasendoscopy versus videofluoroscopy

Abstract

Videofluoroscopy has become the gold standard investigation for assessment of aspiration in patients with clinically diagnosed dysphagia due to neurological causes. Modified nasendoscopy has been described for detection of aspiration with varying findings. Milk nasendoscopy is a simple clinic-based technique to evaluate swallow dysfunction, requiring no radiological input. This paper aims to review the correlation of milk nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopy in the detection of aspiration among patients with clinically diagnosed neurological dysphagia. Retrospective notes of 100 patients attending a combined Swallow Clinic for clinically diagnosed aspiration were reviewed. All patients were subjected to both milk nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopy. Correlation of investigation results was reviewed by Kappa test, and difference was statistically examined with Chi square test. Assessment of aspiration in pre-swallow, swallow and post-swallow phases was reviewed using milk nasendoscopy and videofluoroscopy. The significance of difference was measured using Chi square test. Milk nasendoscopy detected post-swallow phase aspiration significantly more than videofluoroscopy with no significant difference in pre-swallow phase, whereas videofluoroscopy was the investigation of choice in detecting aspiration during the swallow phase. In the investigation of clinically diagnosed neurological dysphagia, substantial correlation was seen in detection between videofluoroscopy and milk nasendoscopy. We suggest that milk nasendoscopy should be used as a preliminary clinic-based test thereby reducing the need for investigations requiring radiation doses.