Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees

Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2004

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Valgus high tibial osteotomy is an established treatment for unicompartmental varus osteoarthritis. However, only little is known about the effect of osteotomy in the sagittal plane on biomechanical parameters such as cartilage pressure and joint kinematics. This study investigated the effects of high tibial flexion osteotomy in a human cadaver model.

Materials and methods

Seven fresh human cadaveric knees underwent an opening wedge osteotomy of the proximal tibia in the sagittal plane. The osteotomy was opened anteriorly, and the tibial slope of the specimen was increased gradually. An isokinetic flexion-extension motion was simulated in a kinematic knee simulator. The contact pressure and topographic pressure distribution in the medial joint space was recorded using an electronic pressure-sensitive film. Simultaneously the motion of the tibial plateau was analyzed three-dimensionally by an ultrasonic tracking system. The traction force to the quadriceps tendon which was applied by the simulator for extension of the joint was continuously measured. The experiments were carried out with intact ligaments and then after successively cutting the posterior and anterior cruciate ligaments.

Results

The results demonstrate that tibial flexion osteotomy leads to a significant alteration in pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. The tibiofemoral contact area and contact pressure was shifted anteriorly, which led to decompression of the posterior half of the plateau. Moreover, the increase in the slope resulted in a significant anterior and superior translation of the tibial plateau with respect to the femoral condyles. Posterior subluxation of the tibial head after cutting the posterior cruciate ligament was completely neutralized by the osteotomy. The increase in slope resulted in a significant higher quadriceps strength which was necessary for full knee extension.

Conclusions

We conclude from these results that changes in tibial slope have a strong effect on cartilage pressure and kinematics of the knee. Therapeutically a flexion osteotomy may be used for decompression of the degenerated cartilage in the posterior part of the plateau, for example, after arthroscopic partial posterior meniscectomy. If a valgus osteotomy is combined with a flexion component of the proximal tibia, complex knee pathologies consisting of posteromedial cartilage damage and posterior and posterolateral instability can be addressed in one procedure, which facilitates a quicker rehabilitation of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4 a, b
Fig. 5 a, b
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation of methods for radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. A study of 83 healthy knees. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82:195–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu KY, Zhang SD, Zhang GH (2000) Posterior slope of tibial plateau in Chinese. J Arthroplasty 15:224–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coventry MB (1979) Upper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. The evolution of the operation in the last 18 years and long term results. Orthop Clin North Am 10:191–210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1993) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:196–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fick R (1911) Spezielle Gelenk- und Muskelmechanik, Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke. Fischer, Jena, pp 535–538

  6. Genin P, Weill G, Julliard R (1993) The tibial slope. Proposal for a measurement method. J Radiol 74:27–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32:376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goutallier D, Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J (1986) Outcome at more than 10 years of 93 tibial osteotomies for internal arthritis in genu varum (or the predominant influence of the frontal angular correction). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 72:101–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:332–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Imhoff AB, Linke RD, Agneskirchner J (2004) High tibial osteotomy and cruciate ligament reconstruction for primary varus, double varus, and triple varus knee instability. Orthopade 33:201–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapandji IA (2001) Physiologie articulaire. In: Kapandji IA (ed) Membre inferieur, vol 3. Hippokrates, Stuttgart

  12. Lobenhoffer P (1999) Chronic instability after posterior cruciate ligament injury. Tactics, techniques, and results. Unfallchirurg 102:824–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner J, Zoch W (2004) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with special medial plate fixator. Orthopade 33:153–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lootvoet L, Massinon A, Rossillon R, Himmer O, Lambert K, Ghosez JP (1993) Upper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis in genu varum. Apropos of a series of 193 cases reviewed 6 to 10 years later. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 79:375–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Ikenoue T, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (1999) Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee. Am J Knee Surg 12:165–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. McKellop HA, Sigholm G, Redfern FC, Doyle B, Sarmiento A, Luck JV Sr (1991) The effect of simulated fracture-angulations of the tibia on cartilage pressures in the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1382–1391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meister K, Talley MC, Horodyski MB, Indelicato PA, Hartzel JS, Batts J (1998) Caudal slope of the tibia and its relationship to noncontact injuries to the ACL. Am J Knee Surg 11:217–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Odenbring S, Egund N, Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Larsen ST (1990) Revision after osteotomy for gonarthrosis. A 10–19-year follow-up of 314 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 61:128–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Slocum B, Devine T (1984) Cranial tibial wedge osteotomy: a technique for eliminating cranial tibial thrust in cranial cruciate ligament repair. J Am Vet Med Assoc 184:564–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Slocum B Slocum TD (1993) Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in the canine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 23:777–795

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ (2002) Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Acta Orthop Scand 73:638–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the German-Speaking Arthroscopy Society (AGA) for the financial support of this study

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Henriettenstiftung, Marienstrasse 72–90, 30171, Hanover, Germany

    J. D. Agneskirchner & P. Lobenhoffer

  2. Institute for Biomechanics and Biomaterials, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany

    C. Hurschler

  3. Orthopedic Department, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany

    C. Stukenborg-Colsman

  4. Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    A. B. Imhoff

Authors
  1. J. D. Agneskirchner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Hurschler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Stukenborg-Colsman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Lobenhoffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Agneskirchner.

Additional information

Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agneskirchner, J.D., Hurschler, C., Stukenborg-Colsman, C. et al. Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124, 575–584 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0728-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0728-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation