Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of relationship between the stoma site and the primary incision on occurrence of laparotomy wound infection in contaminated or dirty wound operations in neonates

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In neonatal surgical patients requiring an enterostomy, there is no definitive recommendation regarding the ideal enterostomy location: at the edge of the primary incision or at a different incision.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 2005–2017 administration data in our institution. All neonatal patients who underwent contaminated or dirty wound laparotomy and enterostomy construction were evaluated regarding the enterostomy location, occurrence of postoperative incisional surgical-site infection (SSI) at the primary incision, and stoma-related complications.

Results

Patients were divided into two groups based on stoma location: at the primary incision (the same incision group: SI group, n = 16) or at another incision (different incision group: DI group, n = 23). We performed 2 jejunostomies, 13 ileostomies, and 1 colostomy in the SI group, and 4 jejunostomies, 18 ileostomies, and 1 colostomy in the DI group. One of 16 patients (6.3%) in the SI group and 2/23 patients (8.7%) in the DI group experienced superficial incisional SSI, with comparable SSI incidence between groups (p = 0.78). Every SSI did not result in stoma-related complications.

Conclusions

Although the enterostomy location did not influence the incidence of laparotomy wound infection in this study, prospective studies are mandatory to fully assess the safety of enterostomy construction at the edge of the primary incision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh M, Owen A, Gull S et al (2006) Surgery for intestinal perforation in preterm neonates: anastomosis vs stoma. J Pediatr Surg 41:725–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haricharan RN, Gallimore JP, Nasr A (2017) Primary anastomosis or ostomy in necrotizing enterocolitis? Pediatr Surg Int 33:1139–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradnock TJ, Knight M, Kenny S et al (2017) British Association of Paediatric Surgeons Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (BAPS-CASS). The use of stomas in the early management of Hirschsprung disease: findings of a national, prospective cohort study. J Pediatr Surg 52:1451–1457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oda O, Davies D, Colapinto K et al (2014) Loop versus divided colostomy for the management of anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 49:87–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garner JS (1986) CDC guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections, 1985. Supercedes guideline for prevention of surgical wound infections published in 1982. Revised Infect Control 7:193–200 (Originally published in 1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ et al (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 13:606–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricketts RR (1984) Surgical therapy for necrotizing enterocolitis. Ann Surg 200:653–657

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronfli R, Maguire K, Walker GM (2013) Neonatal stomas: does a separate incision avoid complications and a full laparotomy at closure? Pediatr Surg Int 29:299–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Segal I, Kang C, Albersheim SG et al (2014) Surgical site infections in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr Surg 49:381–384

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lejus C, Dumont R, Gall CL et al (2013) A preoperative stay in an intensive care unit is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection in neonates. J Pediatr Surg 48:1503–1508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vu LT, Vittinghoff E, Nobuhara KK et al (2014) Surgical site infections in neonates and infants: is antibiotic prophylaxis needed for longer than 24 h? Pediatr Surg Int 30:587–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Clements KE, Fisher M, Quaye K et al (2016) Surgical site infections in the NICU. J Pediatr Surg 51:1405–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Jane Charbonneau, DVM, and Angela Morben, DVM, from Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikihiro Inoue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all of patients or guardians enrolled in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inoue, M., Uchida, K., Nagano, Y. et al. Impact of relationship between the stoma site and the primary incision on occurrence of laparotomy wound infection in contaminated or dirty wound operations in neonates. Pediatr Surg Int 34, 957–960 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4310-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-018-4310-9

Keywords

Navigation