Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes following endoscopic endonasal resection of sellar and supresellar lesions in pediatric patients

  • Focus Session
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is a credible surgical alternative for the resection of sellar and suprasellar lesions such as pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngiomas, and Rathke cleft cysts. However, its application to pediatric patients poses several unique challenges that have not yet been well evaluated. The authors evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes associated with the use of the EEA for treatment of these pathologic entities in pediatric patients.

Methods

Retrospective review of 30 patients between the ages of two and 24 who underwent endoscopic endonasal resection of sellar or suprasellar lesions between January 2010 and December 2015. Endocrinological and ophthalmological outcomes, as well as extent of resection and complications were all evaluated.

Results

Gross total resection was achieved in eight of the nine pituitary adenomas, nine of the 12 craniopharyngiomas, and six of the nine Rathke cleft cysts. Of the 30 patients, 22 remained disease free at last follow-up. A total of six patients developed hypopituitarism and five developed diabetes insipidus. Eleven patients experienced improved vision, sixteen experienced no change, and one patient experienced visual worsening. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak was seen in a single case and later resolved, vasospasm/stroke was experienced by 10% of patients, and new obesity was recorded in 10% of patients. There were no perioperative deaths.

Conclusions

Endoscopic endonasal resection is a safe and effective surgical alternative for the management of sellar and suprasellar pathologies in pediatric populations with excellent outcomes, minimal complications, and a low risk of morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aho CJ, Liu C, Zelman V, Couldwell WT, Weiss MH (2005) Surgical outcomes in 118 patients with Rathke cleft cysts. J Neurosurg 102:189–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benveniste RJ, King WA, Walsh J, Lee JS, Naidich TP, Post KD (2004) Surgery for Rathke cleft cysts: technical considerations and outcomes. J Neurosurg 101:577–584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brockmeyer D, Gruber DP, Haller J, Shelton C, Walker ML (2003) Pediatric skull base surgery. 2. Experience and outcomes in 55 patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 38:9–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell PG, McGettigan B, Luginbuhl A, Yadla S, Rosen M, Evans JJ (2010) Endocrinological and ophthalmological consequences of an initial endonasal endoscopic approach for resection of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus 28:E8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, Del Basso De Caro M, Esposito F, Cirillo S, del Basso de Caro M, Esposito F, Cirillo S, Lombardi G, de Divitiis E (2002) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:193–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P et al (2005) Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cavallo LM, Prevedello DM, Solari D, Gardner PA, Esposito F, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Cappabianca P (2009) Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 111:578–589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chakrabarti I, Amar AP, Couldwell W, Weiss MH (2005) Long-term neurological, visual, and endocrine outcomes following transnasal resection of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 102:650–657

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chivukula S, Koutourousiou M, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Tyler-Kabara EC (2013) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:227–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Conger AR, Lucas J, Zada G, Schwartz TH, Cohen-Gadol AA (2014) Endoscopic extended transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngiomas: nuances of neurosurgical technique. Neurosurg Focus 37:E10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A (2007) Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 61:219–227 discussion 228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dehdashti AR, Ganna A, Witterick I, Gentili F (2009) Expanded endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior cranial base and suprasellar lesions: indications and limitations. Neurosurgery 64:677–687 discussion 687-679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deschler DG, Gutin PH, Mamelak AN, McDermott MW, Kaplan MJ (1996) Complications of anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 6:113–118

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Di Rocco C, Caldarelli M, Tamburrini G, Massimi L (2006) Surgical management of craniopharyngiomas--experience with a pediatric series. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 19(Suppl 1):355–366

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Paulus W, Huk W, Buchfelder M (1999) Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients. J Neurosurg 90:237–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Kelly DF (2008) The endonasal microscopic approach for pituitary adenomas and other parasellar tumors: a 10-year experience. Neurosurgery 63:244–256 discussion 256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feiz-Erfan I, Han PP, Spetzler RF, Horn EM, Klopfenstein JD, Porter RW, Ferreira MAT, Beals SP, Lettieri SC, Joganic EF (2005) The radical transbasal approach for resection of anterior and midline skull base lesions. J Neurosurg 103:485–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Farneti G et al (2006) The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 59:ONS75–ONS83 discussion ONS75-83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gandhi CD, Christiano LD, Eloy JA, Prestigiacomo CJ, Post KD (2009) The historical evolution of transsphenoidal surgery: facilitation by technological advances. Neurosurg Focus 27:E8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Grahovac S, Stefko S (2008) Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg 109:6–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116:1882–1886

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Honegger J, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R (1999) Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: endocrinological results. J Neurosurg 90:251–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Honegger J, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Daubler B, Dorr HG (1992) Transsphenoidal microsurgery for craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol 37:189–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Karavitaki N, Brufani C, Warner JT, Adams CB, Richards P, Ansorge O et al (2005) Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up. Clin Endocrinol 62:397–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kassam A, Thomas AJ, Snyderman C, Carrau R, Gardner P, Mintz A, Kanaan H, Horowitz M, Pollack IF (2007) Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 106:75–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D et al (2008) Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 63:ONS44–ONS52 discussion ONS52-43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tyler-Kabara EC, Wang EW, Snyderman CH (2013) Endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngiomas: surgical outcome in 64 patients. J Neurosurg 119:1194–1207

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laufer I, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2007) Endoscopic, endonasal extended transsphenoidal, transplanum transtuberculum approach for resection of suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 106:400–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leng LZ, Greenfield JP, Souweidane MM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2012) Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. Neurosurgery 70:110–123 discussion 123-114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lobo B, Heng A, Barkhoudarian G, Griffiths CF, Kelly DF (2015) The expanding role of the endonasal endoscopic approach in pituitary and skull base surgery: a 2014 perspective. Surg Neurol Int 6:82

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Locatelli D, Rampa F, Acchiardi I, Bignami M, Pistochini A, Castelnuovo P (2006) Endoscopic endonasal approaches to anterior skull base defects in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst 22:1411–1418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lustig RH, Post SR, Srivannaboon K, Rose SR, Danish RK, Burghen GA, Xiong X, Wu S, Merchant TE (2003) Risk factors for the development of obesity in children surviving brain tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:611–616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinto G, Bussieres L, Recasens C, Souberbielle JC, Zerah M, Brauner R (2000) Hormonal factors influencing weight and growth pattern in craniopharyngioma. Horm Res 53:163–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schwartz TH, Fraser JF, Brown S, Tabaee A, Kacker A, Anand VK (2008) Endoscopic cranial base surgery: classification of operative approaches. Neurosurgery 62:991–1002 discussion 1002-1005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi XE, Wu B, Zhou ZQ, Fan T, Zhang YL (2006) Microsurgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: report of 284 patients. Chin Med J 119:1653–1663

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sklar CA (1994) Craniopharyngioma: endocrine sequelae of treatment. Pediatr Neurosurg 21(Suppl 1):120–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Solari D, Cavallo LM, Somma T, Chiaramonte C, Esposito F, Del Basso De Caro M et al (2015) Endoscopic endonasal approach in the management of Rathke’s cleft cysts. PLoS One 10:e0139609

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sorva R (1988) Children with craniopharyngioma. Early growth failure and rapid postoperative weight gain. Acta Paediatr Scand 77:587–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stahnke N, Grubel G, Lagenstein I, Willig RP (1984) Long-term follow-up of children with craniopharyngioma. Eur J Pediatr 142:179–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stamm AC, Vellutini E, Harvey RJ, Nogeira JF Jr, Herman DR (2008) Endoscopic transnasal craniotomy and the resection of craniopharyngioma. Laryngoscope 118:1142–1148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Effenterre R, Boch AL (2002) Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 97:3–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaun D. Rodgers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koumas, C., Laibangyang, A., Barron, S.L. et al. Outcomes following endoscopic endonasal resection of sellar and supresellar lesions in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst 35, 2099–2105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04258-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-019-04258-1

Keywords

Navigation