Skip to main content
Log in

CATCH-22: a manual bladder washout protocol to improve care for clot retention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To review current practices in manual bladder washouts (MBW) for haematuria with clot retention, comparing those conducted by a urology unit to other inpatient services. Secondly, to describe a standardised protocol for MBWs.

Methods

Prospective data were collected for patients treated for clot retention, from initial management by referral units through to implementation of a standardised MBW by the urology service. Outcomes measured included re-catheterisation, MBW volumes, clot evacuated and time to discharge or subsequent intervention.

Results

Initial catheters inserted by referral teams were sized 16 Fr–20 Fr, all except one requiring upsizing. Mean washout volumes of 145 ml (SD 125) and 5392 ml (SD 847) were used by referring units and the urology service, respectively. Mean volume of clot evacuated by the standardised MBW was 617 ml (SD 313). Continuous bladder irrigation (CBI) was commenced in 16 patients (66%) prior to referral to urology. Median time to discharge was 48 h.

Conclusion

Initial catheter insertion is of inadequate size, as is the volume of washout performed. Referring services fail to clear adequate amounts of clot with washouts posing potential risks to patients. The standard management of clot retention should involve the use of at least a 22 F catheter, implement best practice infection control and adopt the last Clot + 1L rule with catheter manipulation. The key points of our recommended MBW are summarised with the acronym CATCH-22. This protocol can guide initial management of clot retention and be used as an educational tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scholtes S (2002) Management of clot retention following urological surgery. Nurs Times 98(28):48–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Plowman RP, Graves N, Roberts JA (1997) Hospital acquired infection. Office of Health Economics, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG (2002) The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23(1):27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (2011) Case Note Review Booklet. Case 13: Clot retention can lead to death, 3rd edn. RACS, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dungerwalla M et al (2015) Manual bladder washouts for urinary clot retention: a survey of knowledge among healthcare workers. Can J Urol 22(6):8093–8098

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanno P, Malkowicz S, Wein A (2007) Urological emergencies. Penn clinical manual of urology. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. ACI Urology Network Bladder Irrigation Guidelines. NSW

  8. Ritch CR, Ordonez MA, Okhunov Z et al (2009) Pilot study of alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator) for treatment of urinary clot retention in an in vitro model. J Endourol 23(8):1353–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bolger R, Webb C (2012) Clinical guideline: performance of a manual bladder washout. Austin Health, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warlick C, Mouli S, Allaf M, Wagner A, Kavoussi L (2006) Bladder irrigation using hydrogen peroxide for clot evacuation. Urology 68(6):1331–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritch CR, Ordonez MA, Okhunov Z et al (2009) Pilot study of alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator) for treatment of urinary clot retention in an in vitro model. J Endourol 23(8):1353–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeWilde S, Carey IM, Emmas C, Richards N, Cook DG (2006) Trends in the prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation, its treatment with anticoagulation and predictors of such treatment in UK primary care. Heart 92:1064–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P, Swartz L (2007) Bleeding complications with warfarin use: a prevalent adverse effect resulting in regulatory action. Arch Intern Med 167:1414–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostini R, Hegney D, Mackson JM, Williamson M, Tett SE (2008) Why is the use of clopidogrel increasing rapidly in Australia? An exploration of geographical location, age, sex and cardiac stenting rates as possible influences on clopidogrel use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17:1077–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Savage JG, Fried F (1995) Anticoagulant associated hematuria: a prospective study. J Urol 153:1594–1596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Avidor Y, Nadu A, Matzkin H (2000) Clinical significance of gross hematuria and its evaluation in patients receiving anticoagulant and aspirin treatment. Urology 55:22–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mosley DH, Schatz IJ, Breneman GM, Keyes JW (1963) Long-term anticoagulant therapy. Complications and control in a review of 978 cases. JAMA 186:914–916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Satasivam P, Reeves F, Lin M, Daruwalla J, Casan J, Lim C, Royce PL (2012) The effect of oral anticoagulation on the prevalence and management of haematuria in a contemporary Australian patient cohort. BJU Int 110:80–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA et al (2007) Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in US hospitals. Public Health Rep 122(2):160–166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. National Audit Office (2009) Reducing healthcare associated infections in hospitals in England. London Stationery Office. NAO, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EC: Data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. SM: Data collection/management, manuscript writing/editing. DC: Manuscript writing/editing. NL: Project/protocol development, data collection and management

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Clarebrough.

Ethics declarations

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clarebrough, E., McGrath, S., Christidis, D. et al. CATCH-22: a manual bladder washout protocol to improve care for clot retention. World J Urol 36, 2043–2050 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2346-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2346-z

Keywords

Navigation