Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy using a low-powered holmium laser for enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): 12-month results from a prospective low-power HoLEP series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the 12-month outcomes of low-powered holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (LP-HoLEP) for patients with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

Methods

A total of 54 patients with symptomatic BPO were treated with LP-HoLEP. All patients were treated by two experienced LP-HoLEP surgeons. A 50-W Ho:YAG laser was used at 39.6-W (2.2 J, 18 Hz). All patients were assessed preoperatively by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual urine (PVR), PSA, and whole prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound. The patients were reassessed at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. The complications were classified according to the modified Clavien classification system. Patient data were expressed as median (interquartile range) or numbers (%).

Results

The median age was 72.5 (67–77.25) years and the median preoperative prostate volume 74.5 (45–110) ml. 12 (22.2%) patients were treated with ongoing anticoagulant treatment. The median operative time was 65 (41–81) min and the enucleation efficiency 1.11 (0.82–1.79) g/min, respectively. Clavien 1 (11.1%), Clavien 2 (3.7%), Clavien 3a (3.7%), and Clavien 3b (5.5%) complications occurred. At 6-month follow-up, median prostate volume (74.5 vs. 15.5 ml) and PSA (4.03 vs. 0.54 µg/l) had improved significantly compared to baseline (p ≤ 0.009). At 12-month follow-up, Qmax (12 vs. 29.3 ml/s), PVR (155 vs. 11.15 ml), IPSS (22 vs. 6) and QoL (5 vs. 1) had improved significantly (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

LP-HoLEP is technically feasible, safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic BPO. For experienced surgeons, power is less relevant than technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilling PJ, Kennett K, Das AK et al (1998) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) combined with transurethral tissue morcellation: an update on the early clinical experience. J Endourol Endourol Soc 12:457–459. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1998.12.457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ (1998) Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol 33:69–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA et al (2010) Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol 58:384–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cornu J-N, Ahyai S, Bachmann A et al (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 67:1066–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ et al (2012) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU Int 109:408–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10359.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salonia A, Suardi N, Naspro R et al (2006) Holmium laser enucleation versus open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an inpatient cost analysis. Urology 68:302–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A et al (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates > 70 g: 24-month follow-up. Eur Urol 50:563–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 53:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lourenco T, Armstrong N, N’Dow J, et al (2008) Systematic review and economic modelling of effectiveness and cost utility of surgical treatments for men with benign prostatic enlargement. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl 12: iii, ix–x, 1–146, 169–515

  10. Gong Y-G, He D-L, Wang M-Z et al (2012) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a modified enucleation technique and initial results. J Urol 187:1336–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fong BC, Elhilali MM (2004) Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate: multimedia description from a trainee’s perspective. J Endourol 18:791–794. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2004.18.791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rassweiler J, Roder M, Schulze M, Muschter R (2008) Transurethral enucleation of the prostate with the holmium: YAG laser system: how much power is necessary? Urol Ausg A 47:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-008-1684-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S et al (2011) The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 29:205–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0566-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilling PJ, Aho TF, Frampton CM et al (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: results at 6 years. Eur Urol 53:744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baazeem AS, Elmansy HM, Elhilali MM (2010) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: modified technical aspects. BJU Int 105:584–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09111.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 177:1468–1474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.11.091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stern KL, McAdams SB, Cha SS et al (2017) A new laser platform for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: does the lumenis pulse 120H laser platform improve enucleation efficiency? Urology 102:198–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dusing MW, Krambeck AE, Terry C et al (2010) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: efficiency gained by experience and operative technique. J Urol 184:635–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Humphreys MR, Miller NL, Handa SE et al (2008) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate–outcomes independent of prostate size? J Urol 180:2431–2435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.019 (discussion 2435)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahyai SA, Chun FKH, Lehrich K et al (2012) Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate and simple open prostatectomy—which procedure is faster? J Urol 187:1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naspro R, Gomez Sancha F, Manica M et al (2017) From “gold standard” resection to reproducible “future standard” endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: what we know about anatomical enucleation. Minerva Urol E Nefrol Ital J Urol Nephrol 69:446–458. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02834-X

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM (2015) The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1741-y

    Google Scholar 

  24. Krambeck AE, Handa SE, Lingeman JE (2013) Experience with more than 1000 holmium laser prostate enucleations for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 189:S141–S145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elshal AM, Nabeeh H, Eldemerdash Y et al (2017) Prospective assessment of learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a multidimensional approach. J Urol 197:1099–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Kuo RL et al (2006) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates of > 125 ml. BJU Int 97:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05898.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson MD, Matlaga BR, Kim SC et al (2005) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for men with urinary retention. J Urol 174:998–1001. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000170230.26743.e4 (discussion 1001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ, Kennett KM, Dunton NG (2001) Holmium laser resection of the prostate is more cost effective than transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized prospective study. Urology 57:454–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elshal AM, Mekkawy R, Laymon M et al (2016) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for treatment for large-sized benign prostate hyperplasia; is it a realistic endourologic alternative in developing country? World J Urol 34:399–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1639-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kuo RL, Kim SC, Lingeman JE et al (2003) Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): the Methodist Hospital experience with greater than 75 gram enucleations. J Urol 170:149–152. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000070686.56806.a1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BB had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. BB: Project development, Data collection, Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing. AJG: Project development, Manuscript writing/editing. CN: Project development, Data collection, Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Becker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

None.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Becker, B., Gross, A.J. & Netsch, C. Safety and efficacy using a low-powered holmium laser for enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): 12-month results from a prospective low-power HoLEP series. World J Urol 36, 441–447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2159-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2159-5

Keywords

Navigation