Skip to main content
Log in

Extracorporeal lithotripsy endoscopically controlled by ureterorenoscopy (LECURS): a new concept for the treatment of kidney stones—first clinical experience using digital ureterorenoscopes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of extracorporeal lithotripsy endoscopically controlled by simultaneous flexible ureterorenoscopy (LECURS) and combined with Holmium laser lithotripsy for kidney stones surgery.

Methods

Retrograde flexible ureteroscopy allowed stone visualization and intrarenal relocation when possible. Extracorporeal schock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed under direct vision allowing constant focal zone adjustment for optimal stone fragmentation. Holmium laser lithotripsy was used simultaneously when necessary. Post-operative assessment included ultrasound at day one and abdominal CT scan 3 weeks later to evaluate for residual fragments.

Results

Six patients with kidney stones were recruited including 3 with relative contraindication to ESWL. One patient had a stone beyond an infundibular stenosis and 2 had multiple stones in a horseshoe kidney with an uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) stricture. A 100 % stone fragmentation rate was obtained. Post-operative ultrasound was normal in 5 patients and showed slight peri-renal infiltration in the other. One patient developed an obstructive pyelonephritis requiring antibiotics and changing a double J to a ureteral catheter. No other complications were noted. Three patients (50 %) were stone free after LECURS. Three patients underwent a second-look procedure for small (<3 mm) retained residual fragments. No damage was seen with the digital ureteroscopes, laser fibers or stone baskets.

Conclusions

This initial experience with LECURS has shown to be feasible and safe. This opens the opportunity for further evaluation of this approach in order to improve outcomes of both approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK (2012) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol Endourol Soc 26(10):1257–1263. doi:10.1089/end.2012.0217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M (2012) Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x

  3. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, Sietz C (2012) Guidelines on urolithiasis. In: EAU Guidel edition presented at the 27th EAU Annual Congress, Paris, pp. 21–65

  4. Patel A, Fuchs GJ (1997) Expanding the horizons of SWL through adjunctive use of retrograde intrarenal surgery: new techniques and indications. J Endourol Endourol Soc 11(1):33–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hafron J, Fogarty JD, Boczko J, Hoenig DM (2005) Combined ureterorenoscopy and shockwave lithotripsy for large renal stone burden: an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol Endourol Soc 19(4):464–468. doi:10.1089/end.2005.19.464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD007044. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2

  7. Hoznek A, Rode J, Ouzaid I, Faraj B, Kimuli M, de la Taille A, Salomon L, Abbou CC (2012) Modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large kidney and ureteral stones: technique and results. Eur Urol 61(1):164–170. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nomikos MS, Sowter SJ, Tolley DA (2007) Outcomes using a fourth-generation lithotripter: a new benchmark for comparison? BJU Int 100(6):1356–1360. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07117.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinha M, Kekre NS, Chacko KN, Devasia A, Lionel G, Pandey AP, Gopalakrishnan G (2004) Does failure to visualize the ureter distal to an impacted calculus constitute an impediment to successful lithotripsy? J Endourol Endourol Soc 18(5):431–435. doi:10.1089/0892779041271625; discussion 435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendez-Probst CE, Fernadez A, Erdeljan P, Vanjecek M, Cadieux PA, Razvi H (2011) Third prize: the impact of fluid environment manipulation on shockwave lithotripsy artificial calculi fragmentation rates. J Endourol Endourol Soc 25(3):397–401. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng YH, Somani BK, Dennison A, Kata SG, Nabi G, Brown S (2010) Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. J Endourol Endourol Soc 24(12):1915–1920. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Olivier Traxer is a consultant for Coloplast, AMS and Rocamed. Julien Letendre declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Traxer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Traxer, O., Letendre, J. Extracorporeal lithotripsy endoscopically controlled by ureterorenoscopy (LECURS): a new concept for the treatment of kidney stones—first clinical experience using digital ureterorenoscopes. World J Urol 32, 715–721 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1138-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1138-8

Keywords

Navigation