Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism at CT pulmonary angiography: can it improve performance of inexperienced readers?

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm on the performance of novice readers for detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) at CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

Materials and Methods

We included CTPA examinations of 79 patients (50 female, 52 ± 18 years). Studies were evaluated by two independent inexperienced readers who marked all vessels containing PE. After 3 months all studies were reevaluated by the same two readers, this time aided by CAD prototype. A consensus read by three expert radiologists served as the reference standard. Statistical analysis used χ2 and McNemar testing.

Results

Expert consensus revealed 119 PEs in 32 studies. For PE detection, the sensitivity of CAD alone was 78%. Inexperienced readers’ initial interpretations had an average per-PE sensitivity of 50%, which improved to 71% (p < 0.001) with CAD as a second reader. False positives increased from 0.18 to 0.25 per study (p = 0.03). Per-study, the readers initially detected 27/32 positive studies (84%); with CAD this number increased to 29.5 studies (92%; p = 0.125).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that CAD significantly improves the sensitivity of PE detection for inexperienced readers with a small but appreciable increase in the rate of false positives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Strijen M, de Monye W, Schiereck J et al (2003) Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 138:307–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G et al (2002) Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 360:1914–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein P, Fowler S, Goodman L et al (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354:2317–2327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M (2005) MDCT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiology 15(Suppl 4):D37–D41

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baile E, King G, Muller N et al (2000) Spiral computed tomography is comparable to angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:1010–1015

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perrier A, Roy P, Sanchez O et al (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352:1760–1768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoepf U, Holzknecht N, Helmberger T et al (2002) Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 222:483–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN (2003) Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I et al (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winston C, Wechsler R, Salazar A, Kurtz A, Spirn P (1996) Incidental pulmonary emboli detected at helical CT: effect on patient care. Radiology 201:23–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritchie G, McGurk S, McCreath C, Graham C, Murchison JT (2007) Prospective evaluation of unsuspected pulmonary embolism on contrast enhanced multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning. Thorax 62:536–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sebastian A, Paddon A (2006) Clinically unsuspected pulmonary embolism–an important secondary finding in oncology CT. Clin Radiol 61:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gosselin M, Rubin G, Leung A, Huang J, Rizk N (1998) Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans. Radiology 208:209–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Gal G, Righini M, Parent F, van Strijen M, Couturaud F (2006) Diagnosis and management of subsegmental pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 4:724–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginsberg M, King V, Panicek D (2004) Comparison of interpretations of CT angiograms in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism by on-call radiology fellows and subsequently by radiology faculty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:61–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang J, Bi J (2007) Computer Aided Detection of Pulmonary Embolism with Tobogganing and Multiple Instance Classification in CT Pulmonary Angiography. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging

  17. Fairfield J (1990) Toboggan contrast enhancement for contrast segmentation. In:IEEE Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Atlantic City 712–716

  18. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boser B, Guyon I, Vapnik V (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Haussler D, ed. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory 144–152

  20. Zhu J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (eds) (2004) 1-norm support vector machines. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freer T, Ulissey M (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12, 860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 220:781–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Armato Sr, Li F, Giger M, MacMahon H, Sone S, Doi K (2002) Lung cancer: performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 225:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker M, Bogoni L, Obuchowski N et al (2007) Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology 245:140–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson C, Halligan S, Taylor S, Mallett S, Altman D (2008) CT colonography: a systematic review of standard of reporting for studies of computer-aided detection. Radiology 246:426–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Das M, Muhlenbruch G, Helm A et al (2008) Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism: influence on radiologists’ detection performance with respect to vessel segments. Eur Radiol 18:1350–1355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoepf U, Schneider A, Das M, Wood S, Cheema J, Costello P (2007) Pulmonary embolism: computer-aided detection at multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 22:319–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buhmann S, Herzog P, Liang J et al (2007) Clinical evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) prototype for the detection of pulmonary embolism. Acad Radiol 14:651–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Masutani Y, MacMahon H, Doi K (2002) Computerized detection of pulmonary embolism in spiral CT angiography based on volumetric image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imag 21:1517–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou C, Chan H, Patel S et al (2005) Preliminary investigation of computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism in three-dimensional computed tomography pulmonary angiography images. Acad Radiol 12:782–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Engelke C, Schmidt S, Bakai A, Auer F, Marten K (2008) Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary embolism: performance evaluation in consensus with experienced and inexperienced chest radiologists. Eur Radiol 18:298–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Maizlin Z, Vos P, Godoy M, Cooperberg P (2007) Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism on CT angiography: initial experience. J Thorac Imaging 22:324–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM (2004) Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 232:578–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou X, Obuchowski N, McClish D (2002) Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. In. New York, NY, Wiley; 63-66

  34. Zhou C, Chan H, Hadjiiski L et al (2007) Automated detection of pulmonary embolism (PE) in computed tomographic pulmonary angiographic (CTPA) images: multiscale hierarchical expectation-maximization segmentation of vesels and PEs. Proc SPIE 6514:2F1–2F8

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jeudy J, Flukinger T, White C (2006) Evaluation of pulmonary embolism using an automated computer-aided detection tool. RSNA Program Book 255

  36. Das M, Schneider A, Schoepf U, et al (2003) Computer-aided diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary emboli. RSNA Program Book 351–352

  37. Digumarthy S, Kagay C, Legasto A, et al (2006) Computer-aided detection (CAD) of acute pulmonary emboli: evaluation in patients without significant pulmonary disease. RSNA Program Book 255

  38. Das M, Salganicoff M, Bakai A, Muhlenbruch G, Gunther R, Wildberger J (2006) Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism: Assessment of sensitivity with regard to vessel segments. RSNA Program Book 487

  39. Wittenberg R, Peters J, Sonnemans J, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C (2009) Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary embolism: evaluation of pulmonary CT angiograms performed in an on-call setting. Eur Radiol 20:801–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

CF, LB, and MS are employees of Siemens. GB is a consultant for General Electric, Medrad, and Siemens. UJS is a medical consultant for and receives research support from Bayer-Schering, Bracco, General Electric, Medrad, and Siemens. The other authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Joseph Schoepf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blackmon, K.N., Florin, C., Bogoni, L. et al. Computer-aided detection of pulmonary embolism at CT pulmonary angiography: can it improve performance of inexperienced readers?. Eur Radiol 21, 1214–1223 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2050-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2050-x

Keywords

Navigation