Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of therapeutic ultrasound and electrical stimulation program on pain, trunk muscle strength, disability, walking performance, quality of life, and depression in patients with low back pain: a randomized-controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this trial is to investigate and compare the effects of electrical stimulation (ES) program and ultrasound (US) therapy on pain, disability, trunk muscle strength, walking performance, spinal mobility, quality of life (QOL), and depression in the patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). A total of 59 patients with definite CLBP were enrolled in this study. These patients were randomized into three groups. Group 1 (n = 20) was given an ES program and exercises. Group 2 (n = 19) was given an US treatment and exercises. Group 3 (n = 20) was accepted as the control group and was given only exercises. All of the programs were performed 3 days a week, for 6 weeks. The patients were evaluated according to pain, disability, walking performance, endurance, mobility, QOL, depression. The trunk muscle strength was measured with a hand-held dynamometer. All of the groups showed stastically significant improvements in pain, disability, muscle strength, endurance, walking performance, mobility, sub-scores of SF 36, and depression when compared with their initial status. The intergroup comparison showed significant difference in physical function, energy and social function sub-groups of SF-36, VAS pain, extensor muscle strength, between three groups. This difference was statistically significant in the groups 1 and 2 compared to the control group. There was also no significant difference between the groups 1 and 2. We observed that US treatment and ES treatment were effective in improving pain, isometric extensor muscle strength, and QOL in patients with CLBP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frank AO, Souza LD (2001) Conservative management of low back pain. Int J Clin Pract 55:21–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uden A, Aström M, Bergenudd H (1988) Pain drawings in chronic back pain. Spine 13:389–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicolaisen T, Jorgensen K (1985) Trunk strength, back muscle endurance, and low-back trouble. Scand J Rehab Med 17:121–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mayer TG, Smith SS, Keeley J et al (1985) Quantification of lumbar function. Part 2. Sagittal plane trunk strength in chronic low-back pain patients. Spine 10:765–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH (2004) Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works? Pain 107:176–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rainville J, Hartigan C, Martinez E et al (2004) Exercise as a treatment for chronic low back pain. Spine J 4:106–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liberson WT (1984) Electrotherapy. In: Ruskin AP (ed) Current therapy in physiatry. W.B. Sounders Company, Philadelphia, pp 161–191

    Google Scholar 

  8. Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on selected rehabilitation ınterventions for low back pain (2001) Phys Ther 81:1641–1674

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harris GR, Susman JL (2002) Managing musculoskeletal complaints with rehabilitation therapy: summary of the Philadelphia Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on musculoskeletal rehabilitation interventions. J Fam Pract 51:1042–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grubisic F, Grazio S, Jajic Z et al (2006) Therapeutic ultrasound in chronic low back pain treatment. Reumatizam 53:18–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Melzack R, Vetere P, Finch L (1983) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain: A comparison of TENS and massage for pain and range of motion. Phys Ther 63:489–493

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rutkowski B, Neidzialkowska T, Otto J (1977) Electrical stimulation in chronic low back pain. Br J Anaesth 49:629–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Durmus D, Akyol Y, Alayli G et al (2008) Effects of electrical stimulation program on trunk muscle strength, functional capacity, quality of life, and depression in the patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatol Int Dec 20 (Epub ehead of print)

  14. Durmus D, Alayli G, Canturk F (2007) Effects of quadriceps electrical stimulation program on clinical parameters in the patients with knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 26:674–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahanovitz N, Nordin M, Verderame R et al (1987) Normal trunk muscle strength and endurance in women and the effects of exercises and electrical stimulation. Spine 12:112–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koldaş Doğan S, Sonel Tur B et al (2008) Comparison of three different approaches in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Clin Rheumatol 27:873–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kääpä E, Frantsi K, Sarna S et al (2006) Multidisciplinary group rehabilitation versus ındividual physiotherapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial. Spine 31:371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duruöz MT, Ozcan E, Ketenci A et al (1999) Cross cultural validation of the revised Oswestry pain questionnaire (ROPQ) in a Turkish population. Arthritis Rheum 42(9). (Annual Scientific Meeting. Boston, Massachusetts, P1200)

  19. Grönblad M, Hupli M, Wennerstrand P et al (1993) Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the pain disability index (PDI) and the oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain 9:189–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Macrael IF, Wright V (1969) Measurement of back movement. Ann Rheum Dis 28:584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ito T, Shirado O, Suzuki H et al (1996) Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:75–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McGill SM, Childs A, Liebenson C (1999) Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:941–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kvien TK, Kaasa S, Smedstad LM (1998) Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. II. A comparison of the SF-36 with disease-specific measures. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1077–1086

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4:561–571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wheeler AH (1995) Diagnosis and management of low back pain and sciatica. Am Fam Physician 52:1333–1341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cailliet R (1981) Low back pain syndrome. FA Davis, Philadelphia, pp 206–225

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mannion AF, Müntener M, Taimela S et al (2001) Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatol 40:772–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taimela S, Diederich C, Hubsch M et al (2000) The role of physical exercise and inactivity in pain recurrence and absenteeism from work after active outpatient rehabilitation for recurrent or chronic low back pain. Spine 25:1809–1816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bayramoglu M, Akman MN, Kilinç S et al (2001) Isokinetic measurement of trunk muscle strength in women with chronic low-back pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80:650–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Robertson VJ, Baker KG (2001) A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. Phys Ther 81:1339–1350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Unlu Z, Tasci S, Tarhan S et al (2008) Comparison of 3 physical therapy modalities for acute pain in lumbar disc herniation measured by clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 31:191–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lehmann JF, De Lateur BJ (1990) Therapeutic heat. In: Lehmann JF (ed) Therapeutic heat and cold. Wiliams and Wilkins, Baldimore, pp 417–562

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lehmann JF, Bunner GD, Stow RW (1958) Pain threshold measurements after therapeutic application of ultrasound, microwaves and infrared. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 39:560–565

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Québec Task Force on Spinal Disorders (1987) Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians. Spine 12:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gaines JM, Metter EJ, Talbot LA (2004) The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on arthritis knee pain in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee. Appl Nurs Res 17:201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Durmus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durmus, D., Durmaz, Y. & Canturk, F. Effects of therapeutic ultrasound and electrical stimulation program on pain, trunk muscle strength, disability, walking performance, quality of life, and depression in patients with low back pain: a randomized-controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 30, 901–910 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1072-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-1072-7

Keywords

Navigation