Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outpatient Management of Postbiopsy Pneumothorax with Small-Caliber Chest Tubes: Factors Affecting the Need for Prolonged Drainage and Additional Interventions

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of outpatient management of postbiopsy pneumothoraces with small-caliber chest tubes and to assess the factors that influence the need for prolonged drainage or additional interventions.

We evaluated the medical records of patients who were treated with small-caliber chest tubes attached to Heimlich valves for pneumothoraces resulting from image-guided transthoracic needle biopsy to determine the hospital admission rates, the number of days the catheters were left in place, and the need for further interventions. We also evaluated the patient, lesion, and biopsy technique characteristics to determine their influence on the need for prolonged catheter drainage or additional interventions. Of the 191 patients included in our study, 178 (93.2%) were treated as outpatients. Ten patients (5.2%) were admitted for chest tube-related problems, either for underwater suction (n = 8) or for pain control (n = 2). No further interventions were required in 146 patients (76.4%), with successful removal of the chest tubes the day after the biopsy procedure. Prolonged catheter drainage (mean, 4.3 days) was required in 44 patients (23%). Nineteen patients (9.9%) underwent additional interventions for management of pneumothorax. Presence of emphysema was noted more frequently in patients who required additional interventions or prolonged chest tube drainage than in those who did not (51.1% vs. 24.7%; p = 0.001).

We conclude that use of the Heimlich valve allows safe and successful outpatient treatment of most patients requiring chest tube placement for postbiopsy pneumothorax. Additional interventions or prolonged chest tube drainage are needed more frequently in patients with emphysema in the needle path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson JM, Murchison J, Patel D (2003) CT-guided lung biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic yield and complication rate. Clin Radiol 58:791–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM et al. (1999) Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology 212:165–168

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G et al. (2003) CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 229:475–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta S, Krishnamurthy S, Broemeling LD et al. (2005) Small (<=2-cm) subpleural pulmonary lesions: short- versus long-needle-path Ct-guided biopsy–comparison of diagnostic yields and complications. Radiology 234:631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A et al. (1996) Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology 198:371–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saji H, Nakamura H, Tsuchida T et al. (2002) The incidence and the risk of pneumothorax and chest tube placement after percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy: the angle of the needle trajectory is a novel predictor. Chest 121:1521–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Westcott JL, Rao N, Colley DP (1997) Transthoracic needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules. Radiology 202:97–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeow KM, Su IH, Pan KT et al. (2004) Risk factors of pneumothorax and bleeding: multivariate analysis of 660 CT-guided coaxial cutting needle lung biopsies. Chest 126:748–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown KT, Brody LA, Getrajdman GI et al. (1997) Outpatient treatment of iatrogenic pneumothorax after needle biopsy. Radiology 205:249–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennie CJ, Matzinger FR, Marriner JR et al. (2001) Transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: results of early discharge in 506 outpatients. Radiology 219:247–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perlmutt LM, Braun SD, Newman GE et al. (1987) Transthoracic needle aspiration: use of a small chest tube to treat pneumothorax. AJR 148:849–851

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Swischuk JL, Castaneda F, Patel JC et al. (1998) Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: review of 612 lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cannon WB, Mark JB, Jamplis RW (1981) Pneumothorax: a therapeutic update. Am J Surg 142:26–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McKenna RJ Jr, Fischel RJ, Brenner M et al. (1996) Use of the Heimlich valve to shorten hospital stay after lung reduction surgery for emphysema. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1115–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mercier C, Page A, Verdant A et al. (1976) Outpatient management of intercostal tube drainage in spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 22:163–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laronga C, Meric F, Truong MT et al. (2000) A treatment algorithm for pneumothoraces complicating central venous catheter insertion. Am J Surg 180:523–526, discussion 526–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ponn RB, Silverman HJ, Federico JA (1997) Outpatient chest tube management. Ann Thorac Surg 64:1437–1440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerfolio RJ, Bass CS, Pask AH et al. (2002) Predictors and treatment of persistent air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 73:1727–1730, discussion 1730–1721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Covey AM, Gandhi R, Brody LA et al. (2004) Factors associated with pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring treatment after percutaneous lung biopsy in 443 consecutive patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:479–483

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ko JP, Shepard JO, Drucker EA et al. (2001) Factors influencing pneumothorax rate at lung biopsy: Are dwell time and angle of pleural puncture contributing factors? Radiology 218:491–496

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurley MB, Richli WR, Waugh KA (1998) Outpatient management of pneumothorax after fine-needle aspiration: economic advantages for the hospital and patient. Radiology 209:717–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerfolio RJ, Bass C, Katholi CR (2001) Prospective randomized trial compares suction versus water seal for air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1613–1617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall MB, Deeb ME, Bleier JI et al. (2002) Suction vs water seal after pulmonary resection: a randomized prospective study. Chest 121:831–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rice TW, Okereke IC, Blackstone EH (2002) Persistent air-leak following pulmonary resection. Chest Surg Clin N Am 12:529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown TS, Kanthapillai P (1998) Transthoracic needle biopsy for suspected thoracic malignancy in elderly patients using CT guidance. Clin Radiol 53:116–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cerfolio RJ, Tummala RP, Holman WL et al. (1998) A prospective algorithm for the management of air leaks after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 66:1726–1731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yankelevitz DF, Davis SD, Henschke CI (1996) Aspiration of a large pneumothorax resulting from transthoracic needle biopsy. Radiology 200:695–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamagami T, Nakamura T, Iida S et al. (2002) Management of pneumothorax after percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy. Chest 121:1159–1164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Sanjay Gupta, Marshall E. Hicks, Michael J. Wallace, Kamran Ahrar, David C. Madoff & Ravi Murthy

  2. Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 325, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA

    Sanjay Gupta

Authors
  1. Sanjay Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marshall E. Hicks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Wallace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kamran Ahrar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David C. Madoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ravi Murthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, S., Hicks, M.E., Wallace, M.J. et al. Outpatient Management of Postbiopsy Pneumothorax with Small-Caliber Chest Tubes: Factors Affecting the Need for Prolonged Drainage and Additional Interventions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31, 342–348 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9250-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9250-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation