Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Degree of axis correction in valgus high tibial osteotomy: proposal of an individualised approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The first purpose of this study was to introduce an individualized, pathology-based approach for the amount of axis correction in valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO), in which the weight-bearing line (WBL) is transferred in one of three adjacent 5 %-areas of the transverse diameter of the tibial plateau. The second purpose was to define the corresponding mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA) for the margins of each 5 %-area.

Methods

Reported indications for valgus HTO were assorted to one of three groups, based on the underlying pathology and expected accompanying degree of osteoarthritis. Three adjacent 5 %-areas on the tibial plateau were defined, ranging from the 50 % to 65 % coordinate. The medial border of the tibial plateau was defined as 0 % and the lateral border was defined as 100 %. To define the corresponding mFTA, valgus HTO was simulated in 69 patients using commercial available planning software (mediCAD®, Hectec GmbH, Germany). The corresponding mFTA was recorded at four different positions (50 %, 55 %, 60 %, and 65 %).

Results

Within the purposed approach, the WBL is aimed in one of three 5 %-areas (50–55 %, 55–60 %, and 60–65 %) of the transverse diameter of the tibial plateau, according to the underlying pathology. Based on the findings of simulated HTO, the mean mFTA was 0.3° ± 0.2° at the 50 % position, 1.3° ± 0.2° at the 55 % position, 2.4° ± 0.3° at the 60 % position, and 3.4° ± 0.3° at the 65 % position. The mean difference of the mFTA between each adjacent valgus position was 1.1° ± 0.1°.

Conclusion

The present paper introduces an individualized approach to adopt the degree of valgus correction in dependence of the underlying pathology. The area of interest on the tibial plateau lies in between the 50 % and 65 % coordinate on the tibial plateau, or in between a mean mFTA of 0.3° and 3.4° of valgus, respectively. Differences of the resulting mFTA between each area are small, and therefore a precise surgical technique is mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Vena LM, Baldini A, Mondaini A (2003) High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study. J Knee Surg 16(1):21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Imhoff AB, Lobenhoffer P (2004) Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(9):575–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Wrann CD, Lobenhoffer P (2007) The effects of valgus medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on articular cartilage pressure of the knee: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 23(8):852–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amendola A (2003) The role of osteotomy in the multiple ligament injured knee. Arthroscopy 19(Suppl 1):11–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amendola A (2007) Knee osteotomy and meniscal transplantation: indications, technical considerations, and results. Sports Med Arthrosc 15(1):32–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Amendola A, Bonasia DE (2010) Results of high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Int Orthop 34(2):155–160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Amis AA (2013) Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnold MP, Hirschmann MT, Verdonk PC (2012) See the whole picture: knee preserving therapy needs more than surface repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(2):195–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arthur A, LaPrade RF, Agel J (2007) Proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy as the initial treatment for chronic posterolateral corner deficiency in the varus knee: a prospective clinical study. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1844–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bode G, Schmal H, Pestka JM, Ogon P, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2013) A non-randomized controlled clinical trial on autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle with or without high tibial osteotomy in patients with varus deformity of less than 5 degrees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(1):43–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonasia DE, Amendola A (2010) Combined medial meniscal transplantation and high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(7):870–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90(12):1548–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cameron JC, Saha S (1997) Meniscal allograft transplantation for unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 337:164–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1993) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(2):196–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D (1992) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274:248–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Azab HM, Morgenstern M, Ahrens P, Schuster T, Imhoff AB, Lorenz SG (2011) Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics 34(10):e622–e628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feucht MJ, Mauro CS, Brucker PU, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2013) The role of the tibial slope in sustaining and treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):134–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Filardo G, Vannini F, Marcacci M, Andriolo L, Ferruzzi A, Giannini S, Kon E (2013) Matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritic knees: results and failures at midterm follow-up. Am J Sports Med 41(1):95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Marinozzi A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Simultaneous arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes and high tibial osteotomy for tibial chondral defects in the varus knee. Knee 15(4):309–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S (1979) The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin N Am 10(3):585–608

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gardiner A, Gutierrez Sevilla GR, Steiner ME, Richmond JC (2010) Osteotomies about the knee for tibiofemoral malalignment in the athletic patient. Am J Sports Med 38(5):1038–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gebhard F, Krettek C, Hufner T, Grutzner PA, Stockle U, Imhoff AB, Lorenz S, Ljungqvist J, Keppler P (2011) Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(3):297–302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghazavi MT, Pritzker KP, Davis AM, Gross AE (1997) Fresh osteochondral allografts for post-traumatic osteochondral defects of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 79(6):1008–1013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Giffin JR, Shannon FJ (2007) The role of the high tibial osteotomy in the unstable knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 15(1):23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Giffin JR, Stabile KJ, Zantop T, Vogrin TM, Woo SL, Harner CD (2007) Importance of tibial slope for stability of the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 35(9):1443–1449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med 32(2):376–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hankemeier S, Gosling T, Richter M, Hufner T, Hochhausen C, Krettek C (2006) Computer-assisted analysis of lower limb geometry: higher intraobserver reliability compared to conventional method. Comput Aided Surg 11(2):81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(10):917–921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D (1987) Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(3):332–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hinterwimmer S, Beitzel K, Paul J, Kirchhoff C, Sauerschnig M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Imhoff AB (2011) Control of posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 39(4):851–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66(7):1040–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawakami H, Sugano N, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T, Hattori A, Suzuki N (2004) Effects of rotation on measurement of lower limb alignment for knee osteotomy. J Orthop Res 22(6):1248–1253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Laprade RF, Engebretsen L, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Kurtenbach C (2008) The effect of a proximal tibial medial opening wedge osteotomy on posterolateral knee instability: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 36(5):956–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Majima T, Yasuda K, Katsuragi R, Kaneda K (2000) Progression of joint arthrosis 10 to 15 years after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 381:177–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20(4):366–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McNamara I, Birmingham TB, Fowler PJ, Giffin JR (2013) High tibial osteotomy: evolution of research and clinical applications-a Canadian experience. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):23–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Mina C, Garrett WE Jr, Pietrobon R, Glisson R, Higgins L (2008) High tibial osteotomy for unloading osteochondral defects in the medial compartment of the knee. Am J Sports Med 36(5):949–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Minas T, Peterson L (1999) Advanced techniques in autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Clin Sports Med 18(1):13–44, v-vi

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP (1989) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246:250–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Minzlaff P, Feucht MJ, Saier T, Schuster T, Braun S, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2013) Osteochondral autologous transfer combined with valgus high tibial osteotomy: long-term results and survivorship analysis. Am J Sports Med 41(10):2325–2332. doi:10.1177/0363546513496624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Muller M, Strecker W (2008) Arthroscopy prior to osteotomy around the knee? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(11):1217–1221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Naudie DD, Amendola A, Fowler PJ (2004) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for symptomatic hyperextension-varus thrust. Am J Sports Med 32(1):60–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Niemeyer P, Koestler W, Kaehny C, Kreuz PC, Brooks CJ, Strohm PC, Helwig P, Suedkamp NP (2008) Two-year results of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with fixation by medial plate fixator for medial compartment arthritis with varus malalignment of the knee. Arthroscopy 24(7):796–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Niemeyer P, Lenz P, Kreuz PC, Salzmann GM, Sudkamp NP, Schmal H, Steinwachs M (2010) Chondrocyte-seeded type I/III collagen membrane for autologous chondrocyte transplantation: prospective 2-year results in patients with cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 26(8):1074–1082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O, von Heyden J, Sudkamp NP, Kostler W (2010) Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 26(12):1607–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Simon R (1993) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction in varus angulated, anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. A two- to seven-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 21(1):2–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Hewett TE (2000) High tibial osteotomy and ligament reconstruction for varus angulated anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 28(3):282–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Oakeshott RD, Farine I, Pritzker KP, Langer F, Gross AE (1988) A clinical and histologic analysis of failed fresh osteochondral allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res 233:283–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pape D, Rupp S (2007) Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomies. Oper Tech Orthop 17:2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Parker DA, Viskontas DG (2007) Osteotomy for the early varus arthritic knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 15(1):3–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pfahler M, Lutz C, Anetzberger H, Maier M, Hausdorf J, Pellengahr C, Refior HJ (2003) Long-term results of high tibial osteotomy for medial osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Chir Belg 103(6):603–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Phisitkul P, Wolf BR, Amendola A (2006) Role of high tibial and distal femoral osteotomies in the treatment of lateral-posterolateral and medial instabilities of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 14(2):96–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Reising K, Strohm PC, Hauschild O, Schmal H, Khattab M, Sudkamp NP, Niemeyer P (2013) Computer-assisted navigation for the intraoperative assessment of lower limb alignment in high tibial osteotomy can avoid outliers compared with the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Riegger-Krugh C, Gerhart TN, Powers WR, Hayes WC (1998) Tibiofemoral contact pressures in degenerative joint disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:233–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Amendola A (2011) The role of high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(10):590–599

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Salzmann GM, Ahrens P, Naal FD, El-Azab H, Spang JT, Imhoff AB, Lorenz S (2009) Sporting activity after high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 37(2):312–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Salzmann GM, Niemeyer P, Steinwachs M, Kreuz PC, Sudkamp NP, Mayr HO (2011) Cartilage repair approach and treatment characteristics across the knee joint: a European survey. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(3):283–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Saragaglia D, Mercier N, Colle PE (2010) Computer-assisted osteotomies for genu varum deformity: which osteotomy for which varus? Int Orthop 34(2):185–190

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Schinhan M, Gruber M, Dorotka R, Pilz M, Stelzeneder D, Chiari C, Rossler N, Windhager R, Nehrer S (2013) Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation in a compartmentalized early stage of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 21(1):217–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Schroter S, Ihle C, Mueller J, Lobenhoffer P, Stockle U, van Heerwaarden R (2013) Digital planning of high tibial osteotomy. Interrater reliability by using two different software. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):189–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schroter S, Mueller J, van Heerwaarden R, Lobenhoffer P, Stockle U, Albrecht D (2013) Return to work and clinical outcome after open wedge HTO. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Seil R, van Heerwaarden R, Lobenhoffer P, Kohn D (2013) The rapid evolution of knee osteotomies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):1–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Smith JO, Wilson AJ, Thomas NP (2013) Osteotomy around the knee: evolution, principles and results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(1):3–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF (2003) Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis. Survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3):469–474

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Sterett WI, Steadman JR (2004) Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. Am J Sports Med 32(5):1243–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sterett WI, Steadman JR, Huang MJ, Matheny LM, Briggs KK (2010) Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee: survivorship analysis. Am J Sports Med 38(7):1420–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Van Thiel GS, Frank RM, Gupta A, Ghodadra N, Shewman EF, Wang VM, Bach BR, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Provencher MT (2011) Biomechanical evaluation of a high tibial osteotomy with a meniscal transplant. J Knee Surg 24(1):45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Verdonk PC, Verstraete KL, Almqvist KF, De Cuyper K, Veys EM, Verbruggen G, Verdonk R (2006) Meniscal allograft transplantation: long-term clinical results with radiological and magnetic resonance imaging correlations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(8):694–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Voos JE, Suero EM, Citak M, Petrigliano FP, Bosscher MR, Wickiewicz TL, Pearle AD (2012) Effect of tibial slope on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1626–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str.22, 81675, Munich, Germany

    Matthias J. Feucht, Philipp Minzlaff, Tim Saier, Matthias Cotic, Andreas B. Imhoff & Stefan Hinterwimmer

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Freiburg University Hospital, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany

    Matthias J. Feucht, Norbert P. Südkamp & Philipp Niemeyer

  3. Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, Professor-Küntscher-Str. 8, 82418, Murnau, Germany

    Tim Saier

  4. Sportsclinic Germany, Ottobrunnerstr. 55, 81737, Munich, Germany

    Stefan Hinterwimmer

Authors
  1. Matthias J. Feucht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philipp Minzlaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tim Saier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthias Cotic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Norbert P. Südkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Philipp Niemeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andreas B. Imhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Stefan Hinterwimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias J. Feucht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feucht, M.J., Minzlaff, P., Saier, T. et al. Degree of axis correction in valgus high tibial osteotomy: proposal of an individualised approach. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 2273–2280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2442-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2442-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation