Abstract
Purpose
To assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with clinically suspected ectopic pregnancy (EP).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed MRIs of 26 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of having an EP. The diagnostic utility of MRI features of EP was analyzed retrospectively as follows: (1) Direct sign detection of ectopic gestational sac (GS); (2) Indirect signs tubal dilatation with hemosalpinx, adnexal hematoma, and hemorrhagic ascites. The diagnostic accuracy of each sign and their combination was compared to surgical records. The MRI findings of an ectopic GS were reviewed as follows: size, shape, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern.
Results
Of 26 patients, 24 had a tubal pregnancy; 22 of these 24 patients (92%) had a direct sign (sensitivity: 91.3%; specificity: 100%; positive predictive value: 100%). The diagnostic accuracy of the direct sign was 92%; this was more accurate than that of any single indirect sign (39%, 54%, and 50%, respectively). However, the diagnostic accuracy of EP increased to 100% when diagnostic criteria required the presence of a direct sign or at least two indirect signs.
Conclusions
MRI is an effective modality for diagnosing EP with a high detection rate of extrauterine GSs. The combination of direct and indirect signs is useful for establishing the correct diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yoshigi J, Yashiro N, Kinoshita T, O’Uchi T, Kitagaki H (2006) Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with MRI: efficacy of T2*-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 5(1):25–32
Kinoshita T, Ishii K, Higashiiwai H (1999) MR appearance of ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Radiol 32(2):144–147
Ha HK, Jung JK, Kang SJ, et al. (1993) MR imaging in the diagnosis of rare forms of ectopic pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(6):1229–1232
Kataoka ML, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, et al. (1999) Evaluation of ectopic pregnancy by magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 14(10):2644–2650
Tamai K, Koyama T, Togashi K (2007) MR features of ectopic pregnancy. Eur Radiol 17(12):3236–3246
Atri M, Leduc C, Gillett P, et al. (1996) Role of endovaginal sonography in the diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics 16(4):755–774 ((discussion 75))
Lubner M, Menias C, Rucker C, et al. (2007) Blood in the belly: CT findings of hemoperitoneum. Radiographics 27(1):109–125
Skubisz MM, Tong S (2012) The evolution of methotrexate as a treatment for ectopic pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012:637094
Banz C, Chalvatzas N, Kelling K, et al. (2010) Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy during a 9-year period. Fertil Steril 94(7):2780–2782
Farquhar CM (2005) Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 366(9485):583–591
Luciano DE, Jain A, Roy G, Solima E, Luciano AA (2004) Ectopic pregnancy—from surgical emergency to medical management. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):107–121 (quiz 22)
Rabischong B, Tran X, Sleiman AA, et al. (2011) Predictive factors of failure in management of ectopic pregnancy with single-dose methotrexate: a general population-based analysis from the Auvergne Register, France. Fertil Steril 95(1):401-404, 4 e1.
Levine D (2007) Ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 245(2):385–397
Laing FC (1990) Sonographic determination of tubal rupture in patients with ectopic pregnancy: is it feasible? Radiology 177(2):330–331
Tongsong T, Pongsatha S (1993) Transvaginal sonographic features in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 43(3):277–283
Pham H, Lin EC (2007) Adnexal ring of ectopic pregnancy detected by contrast-enhanced CT. Abdom Imaging 32(1):56–58
Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Kawamata K, Iwasaku K, Takasu K (2002) MRI of early unruptured ectopic pregnancy: detection of gestational sac. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(1):134–137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, A., Takahama, J., Marugami, N. et al. Ectopic pregnancy: MRI findings and clinical utility. Abdom Imaging 38, 844–850 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9969-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9969-0