Skip to main content
Log in

Ectopic pregnancy: MRI findings and clinical utility

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with clinically suspected ectopic pregnancy (EP).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed MRIs of 26 consecutive patients who were clinically suspected of having an EP. The diagnostic utility of MRI features of EP was analyzed retrospectively as follows: (1) Direct sign detection of ectopic gestational sac (GS); (2) Indirect signs tubal dilatation with hemosalpinx, adnexal hematoma, and hemorrhagic ascites. The diagnostic accuracy of each sign and their combination was compared to surgical records. The MRI findings of an ectopic GS were reviewed as follows: size, shape, signal intensity, and enhancement pattern.

Results

Of 26 patients, 24 had a tubal pregnancy; 22 of these 24 patients (92%) had a direct sign (sensitivity: 91.3%; specificity: 100%; positive predictive value: 100%). The diagnostic accuracy of the direct sign was 92%; this was more accurate than that of any single indirect sign (39%, 54%, and 50%, respectively). However, the diagnostic accuracy of EP increased to 100% when diagnostic criteria required the presence of a direct sign or at least two indirect signs.

Conclusions

MRI is an effective modality for diagnosing EP with a high detection rate of extrauterine GSs. The combination of direct and indirect signs is useful for establishing the correct diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshigi J, Yashiro N, Kinoshita T, O’Uchi T, Kitagaki H (2006) Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy with MRI: efficacy of T2*-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 5(1):25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kinoshita T, Ishii K, Higashiiwai H (1999) MR appearance of ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy. Eur J Radiol 32(2):144–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ha HK, Jung JK, Kang SJ, et al. (1993) MR imaging in the diagnosis of rare forms of ectopic pregnancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160(6):1229–1232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kataoka ML, Togashi K, Kobayashi H, et al. (1999) Evaluation of ectopic pregnancy by magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 14(10):2644–2650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tamai K, Koyama T, Togashi K (2007) MR features of ectopic pregnancy. Eur Radiol 17(12):3236–3246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atri M, Leduc C, Gillett P, et al. (1996) Role of endovaginal sonography in the diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics 16(4):755–774 ((discussion 75))

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lubner M, Menias C, Rucker C, et al. (2007) Blood in the belly: CT findings of hemoperitoneum. Radiographics 27(1):109–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skubisz MM, Tong S (2012) The evolution of methotrexate as a treatment for ectopic pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012:637094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Banz C, Chalvatzas N, Kelling K, et al. (2010) Laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancy during a 9-year period. Fertil Steril 94(7):2780–2782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farquhar CM (2005) Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 366(9485):583–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Luciano DE, Jain A, Roy G, Solima E, Luciano AA (2004) Ectopic pregnancy—from surgical emergency to medical management. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):107–121 (quiz 22)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rabischong B, Tran X, Sleiman AA, et al. (2011) Predictive factors of failure in management of ectopic pregnancy with single-dose methotrexate: a general population-based analysis from the Auvergne Register, France. Fertil Steril 95(1):401-404, 4 e1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levine D (2007) Ectopic pregnancy. Radiology 245(2):385–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Laing FC (1990) Sonographic determination of tubal rupture in patients with ectopic pregnancy: is it feasible? Radiology 177(2):330–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tongsong T, Pongsatha S (1993) Transvaginal sonographic features in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 43(3):277–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pham H, Lin EC (2007) Adnexal ring of ectopic pregnancy detected by contrast-enhanced CT. Abdom Imaging 32(1):56–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Kawamata K, Iwasaku K, Takasu K (2002) MRI of early unruptured ectopic pregnancy: detection of gestational sac. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(1):134–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aki Takahashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, A., Takahama, J., Marugami, N. et al. Ectopic pregnancy: MRI findings and clinical utility. Abdom Imaging 38, 844–850 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9969-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9969-0

Keywords

Navigation