Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How few cancer cells can be detected by positron emission tomography? A frequent question addressed by an in vitro study

  • Short communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Positron emission tomography (PET) has gained widespread use in cancer diagnosis and treatment, but how many malignant cells are required for a tumour to be detected by PET?

Methods

Three human cancer cell lines [glioblastoma and two subtypes of small cell lung cancer (SCLC)] in concentrations from 104 to 107 were seeded on six-well plates or plastic tubes and treated with [18F]fluorodeoxy-glucose (FDG) in vitro. FDG retention was measured in a PET/CT scanner and in a calibrated well counter. The clinical situation was simulated using a cylinder phantom with a background concentration of FDG.

Results

The theoretical detection limit was found to be around 105 malignant cells. In a cylinder phantom the detection limit was increased by a factor of 10. The FDG retention by the glioblastoma cell line was significantly higher than the activity of the SCLC cell line. FDG retention measured by PET and a gamma counter was closely correlated to the number of cells and a linear relationship was found.

Discussion

The detection limit of PET is in the magnitude of 105 to 106 malignant cells. The experimental set-up was robust and well suited as a platform for further investigations of factors influencing the detection limit of PET.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Pauwels EKJ, Sturm EJC, Bombardieri E, Cleton FJ, Stokkel MPM. Positron-emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose. Part I. Biochemical uptake mechanism and its implication for clinical studies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000;126:549–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cherry SR, Phelps ME. Positron emission tomography: methods and instrumentation. In: Sandler MP, et al, editors. Diagnostic nuclear medicine, volume 1. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1995; p. 139–159

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG. The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology. Eur Respir J 2001;17:802–820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho Shon I, O'Doherty MJ, Maisey MN. Positron emission tomography in lung cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2002;32(4):240–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pedersen MWB, Holm S, Lund EL, Højgaard L, Kristjansen PEG. Coregulation of glucose uptake and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in two small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) sublines in vivo and in vitro. Neoplasia 2001;3(1):80–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haberkorn U, Morr I, Oberdorfer F, Bellemann ME, Blatter J, Altmann A, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in vitro: aspects of method and effects of treatment with gemcitabine. J Nucl Med 1994;35(11):1842–1850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raylman RR, Wahl RL. Evaluation of ion-implanted-silicon detectors for use in intraoperative positron-sensitive probes. Med Phys 1996;23(11):1889–1895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Su H, Forbes A, Gambhir SS, Braun J. Quantitation of cell number by a positron emission tomography reporter gene strategy. Mol Imaging Biol 2004;6(3):139–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruf J, Amthauer H, Oettle H, Steinmüler T, Plotkin M, Pelzer U, et al. Role of F18-FDG PET for monitoring of radiochemotherapy—estimation of detectable number of tumour cells. Onkologie 2004;27:287–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geddes DM. The natural history of lung cancer: a review based on rates of tumour growth. Br J Dis Chest 1979;73(1):1–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Raylman RR, Srinivasan A. Endoprobe: a system for radionuclide-guided endoscopy. Med Phys 2004;31(12):3306–3313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamamoto S, Matsumoto K, Sakamoto S, Tarutani K, Minato K, Senda M. An intra-operative positron probe with background rejection capability for FDG guided surgery. Ann Nucl Med 2005;19(1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank technologist Susanne Svalling for her invaluable and competent assistance during this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara M. Fischer.

Additional information

The first two named authors contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, B.M., Olsen, M.W.B., Ley, C.D. et al. How few cancer cells can be detected by positron emission tomography? A frequent question addressed by an in vitro study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 697–702 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-0038-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-0038-6

Keywords

Navigation