Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Characterisation of the physical performance of the new integrated PET/CT system Discovery ST (GE Medical Systems) has been performed following the NEMA NU 2-1994 (N-94) and the NEMA NU 2-2001 (N-01) standards in both 2D and 3D acquisition configuration. The Discovery ST combines a four or eight multi-slice helical CT scanner with a PET tomograph which consists of 10,080 BGO crystals arranged in 24 rings. The crystal dimensions are 6.3×6.3×30 mm3 and they are organised in blocks of 6×6 crystals, coupled to a single photomultiplier tube with four anodes. The 24 rings of the PET system allow 47 images to be obtained, spaced by 3.27 mm, and covering an axial field of view of 157 mm. The low- and high-energy thresholds are set to 375 and 650 keV, respectively. The coincidence time window is set to 11.7 ns. Using the NEMA N-94 standard, the main results were: (1) the average (radial and tangential) transverse spatial resolution (FWHM) at 1, 10 and 20 cm off axis was 6.28 mm, 7.09 mm and 7.45 mm in 2D, and 6.68 mm, 7.72 mm and 8.13 mm in 3D; (2) the sensitivity for true events was 8,567 cps/kBq/cc in 2D and 36,649 cps/kBq/cc in 3D; (3) the scatter fraction was 15% in 2D and 30% in 3D; (4) the peak true events rate, the true events rate at 50% of the system dead-time and the true events rate when equal to the random events rate were 750 kcps at 189.81 kBq/cc, 744 kcps at 186.48 kBq/cc and 686 kcps at 150.59 kBq/cc, respectively, in 2D, and 922 kcps at 44.03 kBq/cc, 834 kcps at 53.28 kBq/cc and 921 kcps at 44.03 kBq/cc in 3D; (5) the noise equivalent count (NEC) peak rate was 270 kcps at 34.38 kBq/cc in 3D, with random coincidences estimated by delayed events. Using the NEMA N-01 standards the main results were: (1) the average transverse and axial spatial resolution (FWHM) at 1 cm and 10 cm off axis was 6.28 (4.56) mm and 6.88 (6.11) mm in 2D, and 6.29 (5.68) mm and 6.82 (6.05) mm in 3D; (2) the average sensitivity for the two radial positions (r=0 cm and r=10 cm) was 1.93 cps/kBq in 2D and 9.12 cps/kBq in 3D; (3) the scatter fraction was 19% in 2D and 45% in 3D; (4) the NEC peak rate was 54 kcps at 46.99 kBq/cc in 2D and 45.5 kcps at 10.84 kBq/cc in 3D, when random coincidences were estimated by using k=2 in the NEC formula, while the NEC peak rate was 81 kcps at 64.43 kBq/cc and 66 kcps at 14.86 kBq/cc in 2D and 3D, respectively, when random coincidences were estimated by using k=1 in the NEC formula. The new integrated PET-CT system Discovery ST has good overall performances in both 2D and 3D, with in particular a high sensitivity and a very good 3D NEC response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a, b
Fig. 2a, b
Fig. 3a, b
Fig. 4a, b
Fig. 5a, b
Fig. 6a, b
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jerusalem G, Hustinx R, Beguin Y, Fillet G. PET scan imaging in oncology. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39:1525–1534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutton BF, Braun M, Thurfjell L, Lau DY. Image registration: an essential tool for nuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:559–577.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Townsend DW, Beyer T, Blodgett TM. PET/CT scanners: a hardware approach to image fusion. Semin Nucl Med 2003; 33:193–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, et al. A combined PET/CT tomograph for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000; 41:1369–1379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Blodgett TM. Dual-modality PET/CT tomography for clinical oncology. Q J Nucl Med. 2002; 46:24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Messa C, Bettinardi V, Picchio M, Pelosi E, Landoni C, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC, Fazio F. PET/CT in diagnostic oncology. Q.J Nucl Med 2004:in press.

  7. Humm JL, Rosenfeld A, Del Guerra A. From PET detectors to PET scanners. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003; 30:1574–1597.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Perez CA, Bradley J, Chao CK, Grisby PW, Mutic S, MalyapaR. Functional imaging in treatment planning in radiation therapy: a review. Rays 2002; 27:157–173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mawlawi O, Kolmyer SG, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Culp RF, Podoloff DA, Macapinlac H. Performance characteristics of the GE Discovery ST PET/CT scanner using the NEMA NU-2 standard. Proceedings of the SNM 50th Annual Meeting, J Nucl Med Suppl 2003; 44:111P.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Turkington TG, Kolmyer SG, Stearns CW, Williams JJ, Hawk TC. Characterization of the Discovery ST and Advance PET systems using a whole-body phantom. Proceedings of the SNM 50th Annual Meeting, J Nucl Med Suppl 2003; 44:111P.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karp JS, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Hoffman EJ, Lewellen TK, Links JM, Wong WH, Hichwa RD, Casey ME, Colsher JG, Hitchens RE, Muehllehner G, Stoub EW. Performance standards in positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med 1991; 32:2342–2350.

    Google Scholar 

  12. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA NU-2 Standards Publication NU-2-1994: performance measurements of positron emission tomography. Washington DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 1994.

  13. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA NU-2 Standards Publication NU-2-2001: performance measurements of positron emission tomography. Rosslyn, VA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2001.

  14. Daube-Witherspoon ME, Karp JS, Casey ME, DiFilippo FP, Hines H, Muehllehner G, Simcic V, Stearns CW, Adam LE, Kolmyer S, Sossi V. PET performance measurements using the NEMA NU 2-2001 standard. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1398–1409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AHR, von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med 2002; 29:922–927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. DeGrado RT, Turkington GT, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Hoffman JM, Coleman ER. Performance characteristics of a whole body PET scanner. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1398–1406.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewellen TK, Kolmyer SG, Miyaoka RS, Kaplan MS. Investigation of the performance of General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph in 3D mode. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1996; 43:2199–2206.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bailey DL, Jones T, Spinks TJ. A method for measuring the absolute sensitivity of positron emission tomographic scanners. Eur J Nucl Med 1991; 18:374–379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamoto Y, Osman M, Cohade C, Marshall LT, Jonathan ML, Kolmyer S, Richard L, Wahl L. PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1137–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burger C, Goerres G, Schoenes S, Buck A, Lonn AHR, von Schulthess GK. PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511 keV attenuation coefficients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:922–927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was in part supported by a research grant (FIRB N. RBNE015AKZ_001) from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Scientific Institute H. San Raffaele, University of Milano-Bicocca, INB-CNR, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Valentino Bettinardi, Massimo Danna, Annarita Savi, Isabella Castiglioni, Maria Carla Gilardi & Ferruccio Fazio

  2. Institute of Radiological Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Michela Lecchi & Giovanni Lucignani

  3. GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA

    Helmut Bammer

Authors
  1. Valentino Bettinardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Danna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annarita Savi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michela Lecchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Isabella Castiglioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maria Carla Gilardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Helmut Bammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Giovanni Lucignani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ferruccio Fazio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valentino Bettinardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bettinardi, V., Danna, M., Savi, A. et al. Performance evaluation of the new whole-body PET/CT scanner: Discovery ST. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31, 867–881 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1444-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1444-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation