Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fatty degeneration of multifidus muscle in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate and compare the fatty degeneration of multifidus muscles by chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers.

Materials and methods

Sixty-five patients with lumbar disc pathology were selected prospectively for this study. The control group consisted of 25 asymptomatic volunteers. The patients were grouped according to the fatty degeneration of multifidus muscles by a semiquantitative method (grade 0–4) on axial T2 weighted imaging. Chemical shift MRI was performed in the axial plane using a double-echo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence. Fatty degeneration was calculated through signal intensity suppression rate (SISR) and signal intensity index (SII).

Results

The semiquantitative grading of fatty degeneration of the multifidus muscle was 0 in 25 of 65 patients (patient group 0), 1 in 20 patients (patient group 1), 2 in 20 patients (patient group 2). Neither grade 3 nor grade 4 were detected in patient groups. For the control group, patient group 0, patient group 1, and patient group 2, median SISR values were 5.00, −9.00, −17.50, and −22.50 %, respectively. SII median values were −4.20 % for the control group, 7.00 % for patient group 0, 12.50 % for patient group 1, and 19.50 % for patient group 2. SISR values in the multifidus muscle calculated for the patient groups were significantly lower than those calculated for the control group. SII values in patients groups were significantly higher than in the control group.

Conclusions

Chemical shift MRI may be a useful method to quantitatively evaluate the fatty degeneration in multifidus muscle in patients with low back pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao WP, Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Kanamori M, Kimura T. Histochemistry and morphology of the multifidus muscle in lumbar disc herniation. Comparative study between diseased and normal sides. Spine. 2000;25:2191–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kader DF, Wardlaw D, Smith FW. Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Demoulin C, Crielaard JM, Vanderthommen M. Spinal muscle evaluation in healthy individuals and low back pain patients: a literature review. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alston W, Carlson KE, Feldman DJ, Grimm Z, Gerontinos E. A quantitative study of muscle factors in the chronic low back syndrome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1966;14:1041–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mengiardi MD, Schmid MR, Boos N, Pfirrmann CWA, Brunner F, Elfering A, et al. Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2006;240:786–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilke HJ, Wolf S, Claes LE, Arand M, Wiesend A. Stability increase of the lumbar spine with different muscle groups; a biomechanical in vitro study. Spine. 1995;20:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Freeman MD, Woodham MA, Woodman AW. The role of the lumbar multifidus in chronic low back pain: a review. PM R. 2010;2:142–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kjaer P, Bendix T, Sorensen JS, Korsholm L, Leboeuf-Yde C. Are MRI defined fat infiltrations in the multifidus muscles associated with low back pain? BMC Med. 2007;5:2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hultman G, Nordin M, Saraste H, Ohlsen H. Body composition, endurance, strength, cross-sectional area, and density of MM erector spinae in men with and without low back pain. J Spinal Disord. 1993;6:114–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC, Witvrouw EE, De Cuyper HJ. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:266–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hides J, Richardson C, Jull G. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the lumbar multifidus muscle-comparison of two different modalities. Spine. 1995;20:54–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parkkola R, Rytokoski U, Kormano M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine. 1993;18:830–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schilling AM, Heidenreich JO, Schulte T, Grässmann A, Stendel R, Brock M, et al. Changes of the fat/water ratio in the erector trunci muscle in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study with 1H-MRS (in German). Rofo. 2004;176:229–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Savci G, Yazici Z, Sahin N, Akgöz S, Tuncel E. Value of chemical shift subtraction MRI in characterization of adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:130–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, et al. Adrenal masses: quantification of fat content with double-echo chemical shift in-phase and opposed-phase FLASH MR images for differentiation of adrenal adenomas. Radiology. 2001;218:642–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fardon DF, Milette PC. Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(5):E93–E113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures: pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;304:78–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayo-Smith WW, Lee MJ, McNicholas MM, Hahn PF, Boland GW, Saini S. Characterization of adrenal mass (<5 cm) by use of chemical shift MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:91–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell DG, Crovello M, Matteucci T, Peterson RO, Miettinen MM. Benign adrenocortical masses diagnosis with chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;185:345–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fujiyoshi F, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Tsuchimochi S. Characterization of adrenal tumors by chemical shift fast low-angle shot MR imaging: comparison of four methods of quantitative evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1649–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dulor JP, Cambon B, Vignero P, Reyne Y, Nougues J, Casteilla L, et al. Expression of specific white adipose tissue genes in denervation-induced skeletal muscle fatty degeneration. FEBS Lett. 1998;439:89–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Paalanne N, Niinimaki J, Karppinen J, Taimela S, Mutanen P, Takatalo J, et al. Assessment of association between low back pain and paraspinal muscle atrophy using opposed-phase magnetic resonance imaging. A population-based study among young adults. Spine. 2011;36:1961–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JC, Cha JG, Kim Y, Kim YI, Shin BJ. Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis. Comparison with the normal controls. Spine. 2008;33:318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Jost B, Gerber C, Hodler J. Assessment of fat content in supraspinatus muscle with proton MR spectroscopy in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with supraspinatus tendon lesions. Radiology. 2004;232:709–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Costa DN, Pedrosa I, McKenzie C, Reeder SB, Rofsky NM. Body MRI using IDEAL. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1076–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gokalp G, Mutlu FS, Yazıcı Z, Yildirim N. Evaluation of vertebral bone marrow fat content by chemical shift MRI in osteoporosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:577–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zajick DC, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Carrino JA. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology. 2005;237:590–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gokalp G, Yildirim N, Yazici Z, Ercan I. Using chemical-shift MR imaging to quantify fatty degeneration within supraspinatus muscle due to supraspinatus tendon injuries. Skeletal Radiol 2010;39:1211–17.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phoenix J, Betal D, Roberts N, Helliwell TR, Edwards RH. Objective quantification of muscle and fat in human dystrophic muscle by magnetic resonance image analysis. Muscle Nerve. 1996;19:302–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Barker KL, Shamley DR, Jackson D. Changes in the cross-sectional area of multifidus and psoas in patients with unilateral back pain: the relationship to pain and disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(22):E515–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakagaki K, Ozaki J, Tomita Y, Tamai S. Fatty degeneration in the supraspinatus muscle after rotator cuff tear. J Should Elb Surg. 1996;5:194–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Steidle G, Machann J, Claussen CD, Schick F. Separation of intra- and extramyocellular lipid signals in proton MR spectra by determination of their magnetic field distribution. J Magn Reson. 2002;154:228–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Balikesir University, School of Medicine, Balikesir, Turkey

    Bahar Yanik

  2. Department of Radiology, SB Balikesir Ataturk Devlet Hastanesi (Balikesir Ataturk Government Hospital), Balikesir, Turkey

    Bahri Keyik

  3. Department of Radiology, SB Dişkapi Yildirim Beyazit Eğitim Ve Araştirma Hastanesi (Dişkapi yildirim Beyazit Research and Training Hospital), TR-06110, Dişkapi, Ankara, Turkey

    Isik Conkbayir

  4. Bahcelievler Mahallesi Teknik lise, CAD. No: 146/7 Merkez, Balikesir, Turkey

    Bahar Yanik

Authors
  1. Bahar Yanik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bahri Keyik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Isik Conkbayir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahar Yanik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yanik, B., Keyik, B. & Conkbayir, I. Fatty degeneration of multifidus muscle in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with chemical shift magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 42, 771–778 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1545-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1545-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation