Abstract
Objective
To determine distinguishing features between herniation pits (HPs) and other cystic-appearing lesions at the anterior femoral neck in multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and micro-computed tomography (microCT) examinations.
Materials and methods
Institutional review board approval was obtained to examine 37 proximal femora of 23 cadaveric specimens (mean age available in 19 cadavers, 83 years; range 68–100 years; 9 female, 8 male, 6 unknown). All 37 femora were investigated by MSCT. 23 femora, which revealed cystic-appearing lesions at the anterior femoral neck in MSCT examinations, were additionally examined by microCT. Cystic-appearing lesions were categorized by their location, sclerotic margin, demarcation and shape in MSCT with assessment of inter-observer agreement. Detailed cortical and trabecular properties were evaluated in microCT examinations.
Results
There were seven HPs in three femora. There were a number of abnormalities potentially imitating HPs, including focal osteoporosis (13 in 13 femora), degenerative changes (5 in 4 femora) and trabecular restructuring (5 in 4 femora) at the anterior femoral neck. HPs were differentiated on the basis of their subchondral/subcortical location, completely surrounding sclerosis, clear demarcation and round-to-oval shape in MSCT. Because of their location and their microscopic appearance, HPs seem to resemble intra-osseous ganglia at the anterior femoral neck.
Conclusion
HPs have to be differentiated from other cystic appearing lesions at the anterior femoral neck to avoid overestimation of their incidence in the context of diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pitt MJ, Graham AR, Shipman JH, Birkby W. Herniation pit of the femoral neck. AJR. 1982;38:1115–21.
Angel JL. The reaction area of the femoral neck. Clin Orthop. 1964;32:130–42.
Nokes SR, Vogler JB, Spritzer CE, Martinez S, Herfkens RJ. Herniation pits of the femoral neck: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;172:231–4.
Leunig M, Beck M, Kalhor M, Kim YJ, Werlen S, Ganz R. Fibrocystic changes at anterosuperior femoral neck: prevalence in hips with femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236:237–46.
Pfirrmann CWA, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology. 2006;240(3):778–85.
Kassarjian A, Yoon LS, Belzile E, Connolly SA, Millis MB, Palmer WE. Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Radiology. 2005;236:588–92.
Sundberg TP, Toomayan GA, Major NM. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-T MR arthrography: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2006;238(2):706–11.
Bredella MA, Stoller DW. MR imaging of femoroacetabular impingement. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;13:653–64.
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Othop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–20.
Wagner S, Hofstetter W, Chiquet M, et al. Early osteoarthritic changes of human femoral head cartilage subsequent to femoro-acetabular impingement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003;11:508–18.
Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–7.
Resnick D, Niwayama G, Coutts RD. Subchondral cysts (geodes) in arthritic disorders: pathologic and radiographic appearance of the hip joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;128:799–806.
Ondrouch AS. Cyst formation in osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45:755–60.
Milgram JW. Morphologic alterations of the subchondral bone in advanced degenerative arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:293–312.
Ferguson AB. The pathological changes in degenerative arthritis of the hip and treatment by rotational osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1964;46:1337–52.
Schajowicz F, Sainz MC, Slullitel JA. Juxta-articular bone cysts (intra-osseous ganglia): a clinicopathological study of eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1979;61:107–16.
Landells JW. The bone cysts of osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1953;35:643–9.
Feldman F, Johnston A. Intraosseous ganglion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1973;18:328–43.
Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt AM, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M. The direct examination of three-dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 1989;4:3–11.
Chappard D, Retailleau-Gaborit N, Legrand E, Baslé MF, Audran M. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and µCT. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1177–84.
Augat P, Eckstein F. Quantitative imaging of musculoskeletal tissue. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;10:369–90.
Crabbe JP, Martel W, Matthews LS. Rapid growth of femoral herniation pit. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:1038–40.
Daenen B, Preidler KW, Padmanabhan S, et al. Symptomatic herniation pits of the femoral neck: anatomic and clinical study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:149–53.
Panzer S, Augat P, Esch U. CT assessment of herniation pits: prevalence, characteristics, and potential association with morphological predictors of femoroacetabular impingement. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1869–75.
Martin RB. Porosity and specific surface of bone. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1984;3:179–222.
Kambolis C, Bullough PG, Jaffe HL. Ganglionic cystic defects of bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973;55:496–505.
Mainzer F, Minagi H. Intraosseous ganglion: a solitary subchondral lesion of bone. Radiology. 1970;94:387–9.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Prof. Dr. Reinhard Putz and Prof. Dr. Magdalena Müller-Gerbl, Department of Anatomy, LMU Munich, Germany, for providing the anatomical specimens and Julia Körber, Institute of Biomechanics, Trauma Center Murnau for proofreading of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panzer, S., Esch, U., Abdulazim, A.N. et al. Herniation pits and cystic-appearing lesions at the anterior femoral neck: an anatomical study by MSCT and µCT. Skeletal Radiol 39, 645–654 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0792-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0792-9