Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Different Surgical Approaches on Arterial Rigidity in Children After Aortic Coarctation Repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Complications, such as recoarctation or secondary hypertension, probably related to the loss of arterial elasticity, frequently occur after aortic coarctation surgery. This study aimed to investigate arterial compliance as evaluated by automated recording of the QKd interval in patients who underwent repair of coarctation by construction of a subclavian flap compared with those who underwent resection of the narrowed aortic segment with end-to-end anastomosis. Thirty-nine children who underwent surgical repair of aortic coarctation by subclavian flap (n = 19) and by end-to-end anastomosis (n = 20) were enrolled. Arterial stiffness was measured by the noninvasive QKd 100-60 method. Twenty-four–hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and a transthoracic echocardiography were also performed. The group of patients who had an end-to-end anastomosis showed better results regarding 24-hour blood pressure profile and QKD 100-60 value compared with those underwent construction of a subclavian flap. Surgical repair of aortic obstruction by end-to-end anastomosis demonstrates better preservation of arterial distensibility than those repaired by subclavian flap. Therefore, it appears to be advantageous, whenever possible, to use the end-end anastomosis approach, which appears to lessen the incidence of the most common complications after aortic arch surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson RH, Macartney FJ (2002) Paediatric cardiology, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, England, pp 1523–1557

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benetos A, Laurent S, Asmar RG, Lacolley P (1997) Large artery stiffness in hypertension. J Hypertens 15(Suppl 2):89–97

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clark JA, Lieh-Lai MW, Sarnaik A, Mattoo TK (2002) Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection. Pediatrics 110:920–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Devereux RB, Reichek N (1977) Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 55:613–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elzenga NJ, Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Oppenheimer-Dekker A (1986) Coarctation and other obstructive aortic arch anomalies: their relationship to the ductus arteriosus. Int J Cardiol 13:289–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Giordano U, Giannico S, Turchetta A, Hammad F, Calzolari F, Calzolari A (2005) The influence of different surgical procedures on hypertension after repair of coarctation. Cardiol Young 15:477–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano U, Turchetta A, Calzolari F, Crosio G, Giannico S, Calzolari A (2003) Exercise blood pressure response, cardiac output and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children after aortic coarctation repair. Ital Heart J 4:408–412

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gosse P, Braunstein C, Clementy J (1996) Beyond blood pressure measurements: monitoring of the appearance time of Korotkoff sounds. Blood Press Monit 1:193–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosse P, Gasparoux P, Ansoborlo P, Lemetayer P, Clementy J (1997) Prognostic value of ambulatory measurement of the timing of Korotkoff sounds in elderly hypertensives: a pilot study. Am J Hypertens 10:552–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gosse P, Guillo P, Ascher G, Clementy J (1994) Assessment of arterial distensibility by monitoring the timing of Korotkoff sounds. Am J Hypertens 7:228–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gosse P, Jullien V, Lemetayer P, Jarnier P, Clementy J (1999) Ambulatory measurement of the timing of Korotkoff sounds in a group of normal subjects: influence of age and height. Am J Hypertens 12:231–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guèrin P, Jimenez M, Vallot M, Thambo JB, Gosse P (2005) Arterial rigidity of patients operated successfully for coarctation of the aorta without residual hypertension. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 98:557–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho SY, Anderson RH (1979) Coarctation, tubular hypoplasia and the ductus arteriosus. Histological study of 35 specimens. Br Heart J 41:268–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho SY, Somerville J, Yip WC, Anderson RH (1988) Transluminal balloon dilation of resected coarcted segments of thoracic aorta: histological study and clinical implications. Int J Cardiol 19:99–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Isner JM, Donaldson RF, Fulton D, Bhan I, Payne DD, Cleveland RJ (1987) Cystic medial necrosis in coarctation of the aorta: a potential factor contributing to adverse consequences observed after percutaneous balloon angioplasty of coarctation sites. Circulation 75:689–695

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Keane JF, Fyler DC (2006) Nadas’ pediatric cardiology, 2nd edn. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, pp 627–644

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ong CM, Canter CE, Gutierrez FR, Sekarski DR, Goldring DR (1992) Increased stiffness and persistent narrowing of the aorta after successful repair of coarctation of the aorta: relationship to left ventricular mass and blood pressure at rest and with exercise. Am Heart J 123:1594–1600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children (1987) Task force on blood pressure control in children. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Pediatrics 79:1–25

  19. Russell GA, Berry PJ, Watterson K, Dhasmana JP, Wisheart JD (1991) Patterns of ductal tissue in coarctation of the aorta in the first three months of life. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 102:596–601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sehested J, Baandrup U, Mikkelsen E (1982) Different reactivity and structure of the prestenotic and poststenotic aorta in human coarctation. Implications for baroreceptor function. Circulation 65:1060–1065

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallentin I, Hanson E, Eriksson BO (1988) Non-invasive evaluation of the long-term results of coartectomy in childhood. Clin Physiol 8:121–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Paolo Bassareo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassareo, P.P., Marras, A.R., Manai, M.E. et al. The Influence of Different Surgical Approaches on Arterial Rigidity in Children After Aortic Coarctation Repair. Pediatr Cardiol 30, 414–418 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-008-9381-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-008-9381-2

Keywords

Navigation