Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare different and commonly used cell viability assays after CHO cells treatment with anticancer drug bleomycin (20 nM), high voltage (HV) electric pulses (4 pulses, 1200 V/cm, 100 µs, 1 Hz), and combination of bleomycin and HV electric pulses. Cell viability was measured using clonogenic assay, propidium iodide (PI) assay, MTT assay, and employing flow cytometry modality to precisely count cells in definite volume of the sample (flow cytometry assay). Results showed that although clonogenic cell viability drastically decreased correspondingly to 57 and 3 % after cell treatment either with HV pulses or combination of bleomycin and HV pulses (bleomycin electrotransfer), PI assay performed ~15 min after the treatments indicated nearly 100 % cell viability. MTT assay performed at 6–72 h time points after these treatments revealed that MTT cell viability is highly dependent on evaluation time point and decreased with later evaluation time points. Nevertheless, in comparison to clonogenic cell viability, MTT cell viability after bleomycin electrotransfer at all testing time points was significantly higher. Flow cytometry assay if used at later times, 2–3 days after the treatment, allowed reliable evaluation of cell viability. In overall, our results showed that in order to estimate cell viability after cell treatment with combination of the bleomycin and electroporation the most reliable method is clonogenic assay. Improper use of PI and MTT assays can lead to misinterpretation of the experimental results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angius F, Floris A (2015) Liposomes and MTT cell viability assay: an incompatible affair. Toxicol In Vitro 29(2):314–319
Belehradek M, Domenge C, Luboinski B, Orlowski S, Belehradek Jr J, Mir LM (1993) Electrochemotherapy, a new antitumor treatment. First clinical phase I-II trial. Cancer 72(12):3694–3700
Bennett WF, Tieleman DP (2014) The importance of membrane defects-lessons from simulations. Acc Chem Res 47(8):2244–2251
Berridge MV, Tan AS (1993) Characterization of the cellular reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT): subcellular localization, substrate dependence, and involvement of mitochondrial electron transport in MTT reduction. Arch Biochem Biophys 303:474–482
Berridge MV, Tan AS, McCoy KD, Wang R (1996) The biochemical and cellular basis of cell proliferation assays that use tetrazolium salts. Biochemica 4:14–19
Böckmann RA, Groot BL, Kakorin S, Neumann E, Grubmüller H (2008) Kinetics, statistics, and energetics of lipid membrane electroporation studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 95:1837–1850
Casciola M, Bonhenry D, Liberti M, Apollonio F, Tarek M (2014) A molecular dynamic study of cholesterol rich lipid membranes: comparison of electroporation protocols. Bioelectrochemistry 100:11–17
Cepurniene K, Ruzgys P, Treinys R, Satkauskiene I, Satkauskas S (2010) Influence of plasmid concentration on DNA electrotransfer in vitro using high-voltage and low-voltage pulses. J Membr Biol 236(1):81–85
Corovic S, Al Sakere B, Haddad V, Miklavcic D, Mir LM (2008) Importance of contact surface between electrodes and treated tissue in electrochemotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 7(5):393–400
Edhemovic I, Brecelj E, Gasljevic G et al (2014) Intraoperative electrochemotherapy of colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol 110:320–327
Frandsen SK, Gissel H, Hojman P, Tramm T, Eriksen J, Gehl J (2012) Direct therapeutic applications of calcium electroporation to effectively induce tumor necrosis. Cancer Res 72(6):1336–1341
Frandsen SK, Gissel H, Hojman P, Eriksen J, Gehl J (2014) Calcium electroporation in three cell lines: a comparison of bleomycin and calcium, calcium compounds, and pulsing conditions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840(3):1204–1208
Gabriel B, Teissié J (1995) Spatial compartmentation and time resolution of photooxidation of a cell membrane probe in electropermeabilized Chinese hamster ovary cells. Eur J Biochem 228(3):710–718
Gehl J, Skovsgaard T, Mir LM (1998) Enhancement of cytotoxicity by electropermeabilization: an improved method for screening drugs. Anticancer Drugs 9(4):319–325
Gumulec J, Fojtu M, Raudenska M et al (2014) Modulation of induced cytotoxicity of doxorubicin by using apoferritin and liposomal cages. Int J Mol Sci 15(12):22960–22977
Hecht SM (2000) Bleomycin: new perspectives on the mechanism of action. J Nat Prod 63(1):158–168
Hibino M, Itoh H, Kinosita K Jr (1993) Time courses of cell electroporation as revealed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. Biophys J 64:1789–1800
Kaminska I, Kotulska M, Stecka A et al (2012) Electroporation-induced changes in normal immature rat myoblasts (H9C2). Gen Physiol Biophys 31(1):19–25
Kinosita K Jr, Tsong TY (1978) Voltage-induced changes in the conductivity of erythrocyte membranes. Biophys J 24:373–375
Kumar M, Kaur P, Kumar S, Kaur S (2015) Antiproliferative and apoptosis inducing effects of non-polar fractions from Lawsonia inermis L. in cervical (HeLa) cancer cells. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 21(2):249–260
Labanauskiene J, Satkauskas S, Kirveliene V, Venslauskas M, Atkocius V, Didziapetriene J (2009) Enhancement of photodynamic tumor therapy effectiveness by electroporation in vitro. Medicina 45:372–377
Li L, Tan H, Gu Z, Liu Z, Geng Y, Liu Y, Tong H, Tang Y, Qiu J, Su L (2014) Heat stress induces apoptosis through a Ca2+-mediated mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Plos One 9(12):e111083
Miklavcic D, Beravs K, Semrov D, Cemazar M, Demsar F, Sersa G (1998) The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues. Biophys J 74(5):2152–2158
Miklavčič D, Mali B, Kos B, Heller R, Serša G (2014) Electrochemotherapy: from the drawing board into medical practice. Biomed Eng Online 13(1):29. doi:10.1186/1475-925X-13-29
Mir LM, Banoun H, Paoletti C (1988) Introduction of definite amounts of nonpermeant molecules into living cells after electropermeabilization: direct access to the cytosol. Exp Cell Res 175(1):15–25
Mir LM, Orlowski S, Belehradek J Jr, Paoletti C (1991) Electrochemotherapy potentiation of antitumour effect of bleomycin by local electric pulses. Eur J Cancer 27(1):68–72
Mir LM, Tounekti O, Orlowski S (1996) Bleomycin: revival of an old drug. Gen Pharmacol 27(5):745–748
Mir LM, Gehl J, Sersa G et al (2006) Standard operating procedures of the electrochemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Suppl 4:14–25
Miyaki M, Morohashi S, Ono T (1973) Single strand scission and repair of DNA in bleomycin-sensitive and resistant rat ascites Hepatoma cells. Antibiot (Tokyo) 26(7):369–373
Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841–845
Park IK, Kang DH (2013) Effect of Electropermeabilization by ohmic heating for inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes in buffered peptone sater and apple juice. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(23):7122–7129
Poddevin B, Orlowski S, Belehradek J Jr, Mir LM (1991) Very high cytotoxicity of bleomycin introduced into the cytosol of cells in culture. Biochem Pharmacol 42(Suppl):S67–S75
Pucihar G, Kotnik T, Miklavcic D, Teissié J (2008) Kinetics of transmembrane transport of small molecules into electropermeabilized cells. Biophys J 95:2837–2848
Rols MP, Teissié J (1990) Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells Quantitative analysis of the phenomenon. Biophys J 58(5):1089–1098
Romeo S, Wu YH, Levine ZA, Gundersen MA, Vernier TP (2013) Water influx and cell swelling after nanosecond electropermeabilization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1828:1715–1722
Saczko J, Kamińska I, Kotulska M, Bar J, Choromańska A, Rembiałkowska N, Bieżuńska-KK, Rossowska J, Nowakowska D, Kulbacka J (2014) Combination of therapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with electroporation in human ovarian carcinoma model in vitro. Biomed Pharmacother 68(5):573–580
Satkauskas S, Andre F, Bureau MF, Scherman D, Miklavcic D, Mir LM (2005) Electrophoretic component of electric pulses determines the efficacy of in vivo DNA electrotransfer. Hum Gene Ther 16:1194–1201
Sersa G, Cemazar M, Miklavcic D (1995) Antitumor effectiveness of electrochemotherapy with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) in mice. Cancer Res 55(15):3450–3455
Smith KC, Weaver JC (2011) Transmembrane molecular transport during versus after extremely large, nanosecond electric pulses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 412(1):8–12
Soden DM, Larkin JO, Collins CG et al (2006) Successful application of targeted electrochemotherapy using novel flexible electrodes and low dose bleomycin to solid tumours. Cancer Lett 232(2):300–310
Teissie J (2014) Electropermeabilization of the cell membrane. Methods Mol Biol 1121:25–46
Valic B, Golzio M, Pavlin M et al (2003) Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment. Eur Biophys 32(6):519–528
Vásquez JL, Gehl J, Hermann GG (2012) Electroporation enhances mitomycin C cytotoxicity on T24 bladder cancer cell line: a potential improvement of intravesical chemotherapy in bladder cancer. Bioelectrochemistry 88:127–133
Venslauskas MS, Satkauskas S, Rodaite-Riseviciene R (2009) Efficiency of the delivery of small charged molecules into cells in vitro. Bioelectrochemistry 79(1):130–135
Weaver JC, Chizmadzhev YA (1996) Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 41:135–160
Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Serša G, Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2014) Electroporation-based technologies for medicine: principles, applications, and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:295–320
Zou Y, Wang C, Peng R, Wang L, Hu X (2015) Theoretical analyses of cellular transmembrane voltage in suspensions induced by high-frequency fields. Bioelectrochemistry 102:64–72
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by Research Council of Lithuania Project TAP-03/2012 (scientific cooperation of Lithuania, Latvia, and Taiwan).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jakštys, B., Ruzgys, P., Tamošiūnas, M. et al. Different Cell Viability Assays Reveal Inconsistent Results After Bleomycin Electrotransfer In Vitro. J Membrane Biol 248, 857–863 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-015-9813-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-015-9813-x