Abstract
This study investigated whether postural configuration has a significant effect upon the kinematics of arm movements when humans performed unconstrained reach movements to visual targets. Eight subjects were required to reach to static visual targets (unperturbed REACH movements) or correct reach movements when the position of a target unexpectedly changed during the execution of a planned movement (perturbed reaches, or online corrections, OC). Subjects were required to execute REACH and OC movements in sitting and standing (STAND) positions. The height of the targets, distance from the right shoulder (acromion) and eccentricity in terms of the body midline were standardized between the two postural conditions before movements begun. Unperturbed REACH movements were executed to a central target placed at 130 % of outstretched arm length, along the midline (0°). Perturbed (OC) movements involved subjects initiating an arm movement to the 0° target upon its illumination. Two hundred milliseconds after the onset of the hand movement, the 0° target was extinguished and the target at 60° to the right of the midline (still at 130 % outstretched arm distance) illuminated. Subjects had to correct their reach movements online to the new target. Results demonstrated that, despite evident differences in postural kinematics between the four experimental conditions (e.g. pelvis obliquity and trunk/pelvis rotation), postural configuration had little or no effect upon the endpoint kinematics of the finger. Most importantly, the STAND position, with its greater postural constraints, did not affect the time taken to initiate an OC, nor did it lengthen the time taken to complete the REACH or OC movements. Our results suggest, therefore, that postural constraints are accounted for by the central nervous system when executing complex arm reaching movements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander GE, Crutcher MD (1990) Neural representations of the target (goal) of visually guided arm movements in three motor areas of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 64:164–178
Aruin AS, Latash ML (1995) Directional specificity of postural muscles in feed—forward postural reactions during fast voluntary arm movements. Exp Brain Res 103:323–332
Bard C, Turrell Y, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Lamarre Y, Martin O (1999) Deafferentation and pointing with visual double-step perturbations. Exp Brain Res 125:410–416
Belenkii VY, Gurfinkel VS, Paltsev YI (1967) Elements of control of voluntary movements. Biophys 12:154–161
Chvatal SA, Ting LH (2012) Voluntary and reactive recruitment of locomotor muscle synergies during perturbed walking. J Neurosci 32:12237–12250
Cordo PJ, Nashner LM (1982) Properties of postural adjustments associated with rapid arm movements. J Neurophysiol 47:287–302
Danion F, Sarlegna FR (2007) Can the human brain predict the consequences of arm movement corrections when transporting an object? Hints from grip force adjustments. J Neurosci 27:12839–12843
Davidson PR, Wolpert DM (2005) Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review. J Neural Eng 2:S313–S319
Day BI, Brown P (2001) Evidence for subcortical involvement in the visual control of human reaching. Brain 124:1832–1840
Day BI, Lyon IN (2000) Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res 171:174–183
Desmurget M, Pelisson D, Rossetti Y, Prablanc C (1998) From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:761–788
Elliott D, Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R (1991) Discrete versus continuous visual control of manual aiming. Hum Mov Sci 10:393–418
Fautrelle L, Prablanc C, Berret B, Ballay Y, Bonnetblanc F (2010) Pointing to double-step visual stimuli from a standing position: very short latency (express) corrections are observed in upper and lower limbs and may not require cortical involvement. Neuroscience 169(2):697–705
Georgopoulos AP (1986) On reaching. Ann Rev Neurosci 9:147–170
Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Massey JT (1981) Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. J Neurophysiol 46:725–743
Ghez C, Hening W, Gordon J (1991) Organization of voluntary movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1:664–671
Goodale MA, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1986) Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320:748–750
Gritsenko V, Yakovenko S, Kalaska JF (2009) Integration of predictive feedforward and sensory feedback signals for online control of visually guided movement. J Neurophysiol 102:914–930
Hogan N (1984) An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements. J Neurosci 4:2745–2754
Hollerbach MJ, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol Cybern 44:67–77
Jaric S, Gottlieb GL, Latash ML, Corcos DM (1998) Changes in the symmetry of rapid movements: effects of velocity and viscosity. Exp Brain Res 120:52–60
Kahn MA, Lawrence GP, Franks IM, Buckolz E (2004) The utilization of visual feedback form peripheral and central vision in the control of direction. Exp Brain Res 158:241–251
Kaminski TR, Simpkins S (2001) The effects of stance configuration and target distance on reaching. I. Movement preparation. Exp Brain Res 136:439–446
Kaminski TR, Bock C, Gentile AM (1995) The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 106:457–466
Komilis E, Pelisson D, Prablanc C (1993) Error processing in pointing at randomly feedback-induced double-step stimuli. J Mot Behav 25:299–308
Leonard JA, Brown RH, Stapley PJ (2009) Reaching to multiple targets during stance: the spatial organization of feed-forward postural adjustments. J Neurophysiol 101:2120–2133
Leonard JA, Gritsenko V, Ouckama R, Stapley PJ (2011) Postural adjustments for online corrections of arm movements in standing humans. J Neurophysiol 105:2375–2388
Ma S, Feldman AG (1995) Two functionally different synergies during arm reaching movements involving the trunk. J Neurophysiol 73:2120–2122
MacKenzie CL, Martenuick RG, Dugas C, Liske D, Eickmeier B (1987) Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitts’ task: implications for control. Quart J Exp Psychol Sect A Hum Exp Psychol 39:629–647
Massey JT, Schwartz AB, Georgopoulos AP (1986) On information processing and performing a movement sequence. In: Heuer H, Fromm C (eds) Generation and modulation of action patterns. Exp Brain Res. Springer, Berlin, pp 242–251
Pélisson D, Prablanc C, Goodale MA, Jeannerod M (1986) Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Exp Brain Res 62:303–311
Prablanc C, Martin O (1992) Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J Neurophysiol 67:455–469
Prablanc C, Pélisson D, Goodale M (1986) Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Exp Brain Res 62:293–302
Reinchenbach A, Theilscher A, Peer A, Bülthoff HH, Bresciani JP (2009) Seeing the hand while reaching speeds up on-line responses to a sudden change in target position. J Physiol 587:4605–4616
Robert G, Blouin J, Ruget H, Mouchnino L (2007) Coordination between postural and movement controls: effects of changes in body mass distribution on postural and focal component characteristics. Exp Brain Res 181:159–171
Sabes PN (2000) The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:740–746
Sarlegna F, Blouin J, Bresciani J-P, Bourdin C, Vercher J-L, Gauthier GM (2003) Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements. Exp Brain Res 151:524–535
Shabbott BA, Sainburg RL (2009) On-line corrections for visuomotor errors. Exp Brain Res 195:59–72
Soechting JF (1984) Effect of target size on spatial and temporal characteristics of a pointing movement in man. Exp Brain Res 54:121–132
Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1983) Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49:548–564
Stapley P, Pozzo T, Grishin A (1998) The role of anticipatory postural adjustments during forward whole body reaching movements. NeuroReport 9:395–401
Stapley PJ, Pozzo T, Cheron G, Grishin A (1999) Does the coordination between posture and movement during human whole-body reaching ensure center of mass stabilization? Exp Brain Res 129:134–146
Thomas JS, Corcos DM, Hasan Z (2003) Effect of movement speed on limb segment motions for reaching from a standing position. Exp Brain Res 148:377–387
Thomas JS, Corcos DM, Hasan Z (2005) Kinematic and kinetic constraints on arm, trunk and leg segments in target-reaching movements. J Neurophysiol 93:352–364
Var JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Canada Graduate Scholarship to Silvia Hua. Dr P Stapley received a University of Wollongong, University Research Committee, Small Grants Scheme Award. The authors thank Ryan Ouckama for his technical assistance in data collection and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hua, S., Leonard, J.A., Hilderley, A.J. et al. Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics. Exp Brain Res 227, 63–78 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3485-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3485-5