Abstract
The mislocalization profile, describing incorrect localization of faint tactile stimuli to different regions of the body, has been shown to provide insight into the processing of tactile stimuli. Interhemispheric somatosensory processing was examined in 15 subjects by studying the interference of left-hand stimulation on right-hand perception. In different conditions supra-threshold interference stimuli were applied to the left thumb or little finger either 200 or 500 ms prior to the application of a test stimulus on the right hand. Data show that interference stimuli applied to the left hand massively altered localization responses for stimuli applied to the right side. Stimulating the left thumb yielded an increased number of mislocalizations to the right thumb. Similarly, stimulating the left little finger caused a shift in localization responses towards the right ring finger. Results support the hypothesis that interaction of somatosensory information originating from different sides of the body follows a somatotopic organization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braun C, Schweizer R, Elbert T, Birbaumer N, Taub E (2000) Differential Activation in Somatosensory Cortex for Different Discrimination Tasks. J Neurosci 20:446–450
Braun C, Haug M, Wiech K, Birbaumer N, Elbert T, Roberts LE (2002) Functional organization of primary somatosensory cortex depends on the focus of attention. NeuroImage 17:1451–1458
Chen LM, Friedman RP, Ramsden BM, LaMotte RH, Roe AW (2001) Fine-scale organization of SI (area 3b) in the squirrel monkey revealed with intrinsic optical imaging. J Neurophysiol 86:3011–3029
Godde B, Hilger T, von Seelen W, Berkenfeld T, Dinse HR (1995) Optical imaging of rat somatosensory cortex reveals representational overlap as a topographic principle. Neuroreport 29:24–28
Hämälainen H, Kekoni J, Sams M, Reinikainen K, Näätanen R (1990) Human somatosensory evoked potentials to mechanical pulses and vibration: contributions of SI and SII somatosensory cortices to P50 and P100 components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 75:13–21
Hansson T, Brismar T (1999) Tactile stimulation of the hand causes bilateral cortical activation: a functional magnetic resonance study in humans. Neurosci Lett 271:29–32
Hari R, Reinikainen K, Kaukoranta E, Hämäläinen M, Ilmoniemi R, Penttinen A, Salminen J, Teszner D (1984) Somatosensory evoked cerebral magnetic fields from SI and SII in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 57:254–263
Harris JA, Harris IM, Diamond ME (2001) The topography of tactile learning in humans. J Neurosci 21:1056–1061
Harris JA, Thein T, Clifford CW (2004) Dissociating detection from localization of tactile stimuli. J Neurosci 24:3683–3693
Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Watanabe S, Shimojo M (1997) Activity in posterior parietal cortex following somatosensory stimulation in man: magnetoencephalographic study using spatio-temporal source analysis. Brain Topogr 10:23–30
Iwamura Y, Tanaka M, Sakamoto M, Hikosaka O (1983) Converging patterns of finger representation and complex response properties of neurons in area 1 of the first somatosensory cortex of the conscious monkey. Exp Brain Res 51:327–337
Iwamura Y, Iriki A, Tanaka M (1994) Bilateral hand representation in the postcentral somatosensory cortex. Nature 369:554–556
Iwamura Y, Tanaka M, Iriki A, Taoka M, Taoka M (2002) Processing of tactile and kinesthetic signals from bilateral sides of the body in the postcentral gyrus of awake monkeys. Behav Brain Research 135:185–190
Jones EG, Coulter JD, Hendry SH (1978) Intracortical connectivity of architectonic fields in the somatic sensory, motor and parietal cortex of monkeys. J Comp Neurol 181:291–347
Jones EG, Schwark HD, Callahan PA (1986) Extent of ipsilateral representations in the ventral posterior medial nucleus of the monkey thalamus. Exp Brain Res 63:310–320
Killackey HP, Gould HJI, Cusick CG, Pons TP, Kaas JH (1983) The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of New and Old World monkeys. J Comp Neurol 219:384–419
Moore CI, Nelson SB (1998) Spatio-temporal subthreshold receptive fields in the vibrissa representation of rat primary somatosensory cortex. J Neurophysiol 80:2882–2892
Penfield W, Boldrey E (1937) Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 60:389–443
Penfield W, Rasmussen AT (1950) The cerebral cortex of man. Macmillan, New York
Reed CL, Shoham S, Halgren E (2004) Neural substrates of tactile object recognition: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Map 21:236–246
Ruben J, Schwiemann J, Deuchert M, Meyer R, Krause T, Curio G, Villringer K, Kurth R, Villringer A (2001) Somatotopic organization of human secondary somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex 11:463–473
Schnitzler A, Salmelin R, Salenius S, Jousmaki V, Hari R (1995) Tactile information from the human hand reaches the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Lett 200:25–28
Schweizer R, Maier M, Braun C, Birbaumer N (2000) Distribution of mislocalization at the fingers of the human hand. Somatosens Mot Res 17:309–316
Schweizer R, Braun C, Fromm C, Wilms A, Birbaumer N (2001) The distribution of mislocalization across fingers demonstrates training-induced neuroplastic changes in somatosensory cortex. Exp Brain Res 139:435–442
Shoham D, Grinvald A (2001) The cortical representation of the hand in macaque and human area S-I: high resolution optical imaging. J Neurosci 21:6820–6835
Shuler M, Krupa D, Nicolelis M (2001) Bilateral integration of whisker information in the primary somatosensory cortex of rats. J Neurosci 21:5251–5261
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biomentry. Freeman, New York
Sur M, Merzenich MM, Kaas JH (1980) Magnification, receptive field area, and hypercolumn size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. J Neurophysiol 44:295–311
Sur M, Garraghty PE, Bruce CJ (1985) Somatosensory cortex in macaque monkeys: laminar differences in receptive field size in area 3b and 1. Brain Res 342:391–395
Weinstein S (1968) Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. In: Kenshalo DR Sr (ed) The skin senses. Charles L Thomas, Springfield, pp 195–222
Weinstein S, Sersen EA (1961) Tactual sensitivity as a function of handedness and laterality. J Comp Physiol Psychol 54:665–669
Weller RE, Sur M, Kaas JH (1987) Callosal and ipsilateral cortical connections of the body surface representations in SI and SII of tree shrews. Somatosens Res 5:107–133
Acknowledgements
We owe many thanks to Wolfgang Kern for constructing the tactile stimulator and to Dipl. Ing. Jürgen Dax for developing the stimulus control electronics and software. Research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 550/C6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braun, C., Hess, H., Burkhardt, M. et al. The right hand knows what the left hand is feeling. Exp Brain Res 162, 366–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2187-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2187-4