Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Enhanced behavioral performance mediated by multisensory stimuli has been shown using a variety of measures, including response times, orientation behaviors, and even simple stimulus detection. However, there has been little evidence for a multisensory-mediated improvement in stimulus localization. We suggest that this lack of effect may be a result of the high acuity of the visual system. To examine whether normal visual acuity may be masking any potential multisensory benefit for stimulus localization, we examined the ability of human subjects to localize visual, auditory and combined visual-auditory targets under conditions of normal and degraded vision. Under conditions of normal vision, localization precision (i.e., variability) was equivalent for visual and multisensory targets, and was significantly worse for auditory targets. In contrast, under conditions of induced myopia, visual localization performance was degraded by an average of 25%, while auditory localization performance was unaffected. However, during induced myopia, multisensory (i.e., visual-auditory) localization performance was significantly improved relative to visual performance. These results show a multisensory-mediated enhancement in human localization ability, and illustrate the cross-modal benefits that can be obtained when spatial information in one sense is compromised or ambiguous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1A, B.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Corneil BD, Van Wanrooij M, Munoz DP, Van Opstal AJ (2002) Auditory-visual interactions subserving goal-directed saccades in a complex scene. J Neurophysiol 88:438–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frassinetti F, Bolognini N, Ladavas E (2002a) Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Exp Brain Res 147:332–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frassinetti F, Pavani F, Ladavas E (2002b) Acoustical vision of neglected stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs in neglect patients. J Cogn Neurosci 14:62–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frens MA, Van Opstal AJ (1995) A quantitative study of auditory-evoked saccadic eye movements in two dimensions. Exp Brain Res 107:103–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frens MA, Van Opstal AJ, Van der Willigen RF (1995) Spatial and temporal factors determine auditory-visual interactions in human saccadic eye movements. Percept Psychophys 57:802–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston W, Wallace M, Vaughan J, Stein B, Norris J, Schirillo J (2003) Visual localization ability influences cross-modal bias. J Cogn Neurosci 15:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington LK, Peck CK (1998) Spatial disparity affects visual-auditory interactions in human sensorimotor processing. Exp Brain Res 122:247–252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP, Templeton WB (1966) Human spatial orientation. Wiley, London

  • Hughes HC, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Nozawa G, Fendrich R (1994) Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: saccades versus manual responses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:131–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelace C, Stein B, Wallace M (in press) An irrelevant light enhances detection in humans: A psychophysical analysis of multisensory integration in stimulus detection. Cognit Brain Res

  • McGurk H, MacDonald J (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264:746–748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroger E, Widmann A (1998) Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration. Psychophysiology 35:755–759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Stein BE, Huneycutt WS, Meredith MA (1988) Neurons and behavior: the same rules of multisensory integration apply. Brain Res 448:355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein B, Meredith M, Huneycutt W, McDade L (1989) Behavioral indices of multisensory integration: orientation to visual cues is affected by auditory stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci 1:12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch RB (1999) Meaning, attention, and the "unity assumption" in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions. In: Musseler J (ed) Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events, vol 129. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 371–387

  • Welch RB, Warren DH (1986) Intersensory interactions. In: Thomas JP (ed) Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1: sensory processes and perception. Wiley, New York, pp 25.21–25.36

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. David Hairston.

Additional information

The study was supported by NIH DC00057, Forsyth County United Way, and WFUSM Venture Funds. The authors would like to thank Tom Redick for his assistance

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hairston, W.D., Laurienti, P.J., Mishra, G. et al. Multisensory enhancement of localization under conditions of induced myopia. Exp Brain Res 152, 404–408 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1646-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1646-7

Keywords

Navigation