Abstract
Summary
To compare growth patterns and strength of weight- and non-weight-bearing bones longitudinally. Irrespective of sex and ethnicity, metacarpal growth was similar to that of the non-weight-bearing radius but differed from that of the weight-bearing tibia. Weight- and non-weight-bearing bones have different growth and strength patterns.
Introduction
Functional loading modulates bone size and strength.
Methods
To compare growth patterns and strength of weight- and non-weight-bearing bones longitudinally, we performed manual radiogrammetry of the second metacarpal on hand-wrist radiographs and measured peripheral quantitative computed tomography images of the radius (65%) and tibia (38% and 65%), annually on 372 black and 152 white South African participants (ages 12–20 years). We aligned participants by age from peak metacarpal length velocity. We assessed bone width (BW, mm); cortical thickness (CT, mm); medullary width (MW, mm); stress-strain index (SSI, mm3); and muscle cross-sectional area (MCSA, mm2).
Results
From 12 to 20 years, the associations between metacarpal measures (BW, CT and SSI) and MCSA at the radius (males R2 = 0.33–0.45; females R2 = 0.12–0.20) were stronger than the tibia (males R2 = 0.01–0.11; females R2 = 0.007–0.04). In all groups, radial BW, CT and MW accrual rates were similar to those of the metacarpal, except in white females who had lower radial CT (0.04 mm/year) and greater radial MW (0.06 mm/year) accrual. In all groups, except for CT in white males, tibial BW and CT accrual rates were greater than at the metacarpal. Tibial MW (0.29–0.35 mm/year) increased significantly relative to metacarpal MW (− 0.07 to 0.06 mm/year) in males only. In all groups, except white females, SSI increased in each bone.
Conclusion
Irrespective of sex and ethnicity, metacarpal growth was similar to that of the non-weight-bearing radius but differed from that of the weight-bearing tibia. The local and systemic factors influencing site-specific differences require further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jarvinen TL, Sievanen H, Jokihaara J, Einhorn TA (2005) Revival of bone strength: the bottom line. J Bone Miner Res 20:717–720
Schlecht SH, Bigelow EM, Jepsen KJ (2015) How does bone strength compare across sex, site, and ethnicity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:2540–2547
Garn S (1970) The earlier gain and later loss of cortical bone. In: Thomas CC (ed) Nutritional Perspectives. Springfield, IL p 3–120
Kirmani S, Christen D, van Lenthe GH, Fischer PR, Bouxsein ML, McCready LK, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL, Amin S, Müller R, Khosla S (2009) Bone structure at the distal radius during adolescent growth. J Bone Miner Res 24:1033–1042
Gabel L, Nettlefold L, Brasher PM, Moore SA, Ahamed Y, Macdonald HM, McKay HA (2015) Reexamining the surfaces of bone in boys and girls during adolescent growth: a 12-year mixed longitudinal pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res 30:2158–2167
Micklesfield LK, Norris SA, Pettifor JM (2011) Determinants of bone size and strength in 13-year-old south African children: the influence of ethnicity, sex and pubertal maturation. Bone 48:777–785
Magan A, Nyati LH, Micklesfield LK, Norris SA, Pettifor JM (2017) Metacarpal growth during adolescence in a longitudinal South African cohort. J Bone Miner Res 32:1926–1934
Schoenbuchner SM, Pettifor JM, Norris SA, Micklesfield LK, Prentice A, Ward KA (2017) Ethnic differences in peripheral skeletal development among urban South African adolescents: a ten-year longitudinal pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res 32:2355–2366
Meiring RM, Micklesfield LK, McVeigh JA (2016) The effect of loading and ethnicity on annual changes in cortical bone of the radius and tibia in pre-pubertal children. Ann Hum Biol 43:520–526
Schoenau E, Frost HM (2002) The “muscle-bone unit” in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 70:405–407
Ruff C (2003) Growth in bone strength, body size, and muscle size in a juvenile longitudinal sample. Bone 33:317–329
Schoenau E (2004) The peak bone mass concept: is it still relevant? Pediatr Nephrol 19:825–831
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Beck B, Manz F, Rauch F (2002) Bone mineral content per muscle cross-sectional area as an index of the functional muscle-bone unit. J Bone Miner Res 17:1095–1101
Pang MY, Ashe MC, Eng JJ (2007) Muscle weakness, spasticity and disuse contribute to demineralization and geometric changes in the radius following chronic stroke. Osteoporos Int 18:1243–1252
Pang MY, Ashe MC, Eng JJ (2008) Tibial bone geometry in chronic stroke patients: influence of sex, cardiovascular health, and muscle mass. J Bone Miner Res 23:1023–1030
Fox KM, Kimura S, Powell-Threets K, Plato CC (1995) Radial and ulnar cortical thickness of the second metacarpal. J Bone Miner Res 10:1930–1934
Cole JH, van der Meulen MC (2011) Whole bone mechanics and bone quality. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2139–2149
Barnett E, Nordin BE (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11:166–174
Binkley TL, Berry R, Specker BL (2008) Methods for measurement of pediatric bone. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 9:95–106
Kontulainen SA, Johnston JD, Liu D, Leung C, Oxland TR, McKay HA (2008) Strength indices from pQCT imaging predict up to 85% of variance in bone failure properties at tibial epiphysis and diaphysis. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 8:401–409
Richter L, Norris S, Pettifor J, Yach D, Cameron N (2007) Cohort profile: Mandela’s children: the 1990 birth to twenty study in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol 36:504–511
May A, Pettifor JM, Norris SA, Ramsay M, Lombard Z (2013) Genetic factors influencing bone mineral content in a black south African population. J Bone Miner Metab 31:708–716
Cole TJ, Donaldson MD, Ben-Shlomo Y (2010) SITAR—a useful instrument for growth curve analysis. Int J Epidemiol 39:1558–1566
Tanner JM (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method). W.B. Saunders, London
Cointry GR, Ferretti JL, Reina PS, Nocciolino LM, Rittweger J, Capozza RF (2014) The pQCT ‘Bone Strength Indices’ (BSIs, SSI). Relative mechanical impact and diagnostic value of the indicators of bone tissue and design quality employed in their calculation in healthy men and pre- and post-menopausal women. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 14:29–40
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F (2001) The development of bone strength at the proximal radius during childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:613–618
Eser P, Aeberli D, Widmer J, Moller B, Villiger PM (2011) Abnormal bone geometry at the metacarpal bone shaft of rheumatoid arthritis patients with maintained muscle-bone relationship. Arthritis Care Res 63:383–389
Zhu K, Briffa K, Smith A, Mountain J, Briggs AM, Lye S, Pennell C, Straker L, Walsh JP (2014) Gender differences in the relationships between lean body mass, fat mass and peak bone mass in young adults. Osteoporos Int 25:1563–1570
Nieves JW, Formica C, Ruffing J, Zion M, Garrett P, Lindsay R, Cosman F (2005) Males have larger skeletal size and bone mass than females, despite comparable body size. J Bone Miner Res 20:529–535
Rauch F, Bailey DA, Baxter-Jones A, Mirwald R, Faulkner R (2004) The 'muscle-bone unit' during the pubertal growth spurt. Bone 34:771–775
Sumner DR, Andriacchi TP (1996) Adaptation to differential loading: comparison of growth-related changes in cross-sectional properties of the human femur and humerus. Bone 19:121–126
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Mokov E, Wassmer G, Manz F (2000) Influence of puberty on muscle area and cortical bone area of the forearm in boys and girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1095–1098
Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F, Schoenau E (2001) Modeling of cross-sectional bone size, mass and geometry at the proximal radius: a study of normal bone development using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 12:538–547
Frost HM (2003) Bone’s mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 275:1081–1101
Bailey DA, Wedge JH, McCulloch RG, Martin AD, Bernhardson SC (1989) Epidemiology of fractures of the distal end of the radius in children as associated with growth. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1225–1231
Nishiyama KK, Macdonald HM, Moore SA, Fung T, Boyd SK, McKay HA (2012) Cortical porosity is higher in boys compared with girls at the distal radius and distal tibia during pubertal growth: an HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res 27:273–282
Turner CH (2002) Biomechanics of bone: determinants of skeletal fragility and bone quality. Osteoporos Int 13:97–104
Thandrayen K, Norris SA, Pettifor JM (2009) Fracture rates in urban South African children of different ethnic origins: the birth to twenty cohort. Osteoporos Int 20:47–52
Frisancho AR, Garn SM, Ascoli W (1970) Subperiosteal and endosteal bone apposition during adolescence. Hum Biol 42:639–664
Martin DD, Heckmann C, Jenni OG, Ranke MB, Binder G, Thodberg HH (2011) Metacarpal thickness, width, length and medullary diameter in children—reference curves from the first Zurich longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 22:1525–1536
Gabel L, Macdonald HM, McKay HA (2017) Sex differences and growth-related adaptations in bone microarchitecture, geometry, density, and strength from childhood to early adulthood: a mixed longitudinal HR-pQCT study. J Bone Miner Res 32:250–263
Cooper C, Dennison EM, Leufkens HG, Bishop N, van Staa TP (2004) Epidemiology of childhood fractures in Britain: a study using the general practice research database. J Bone Miner Res 19:1976–1981
Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Shaffer RA, Betsinger K, Trone DW, Brodine SK (2000) Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors. Bone 27:437–444
Gabel L, Macdonald HM, McKay HA (2016) Reply to: challenges in the acquisition and analysis of bone microstructure during growth. J Bone Miner Res 31:2242–2243
Tan VP, Macdonald HM, Kim S, Nettlefold L, Gabel L, Ashe MC, McKay HA (2014) Influence of physical activity on bone strength in children and adolescents: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 29:2161–2181
Acknowledgements
The contribution of the Bone Health staff, participants and caregivers is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Dr. Simon Schoenbuchner for assisting with the preparation of the pQCT data.
Funding
The Bone Health Cohort was supported financially by the Wellcome Trust (UK) and the South African Medical Research Council. JMP received funding from the National Research Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Figure 1
Participant recruitment (N) and the number of participants (n) aged between 12 and 20 years with their respective number of observations (PNG 26 kb)
Supplementary Figure 2
Metacarpal stress-strain index in relation to radial muscle cross-sectional area in black and white females and males (PNG 246 kb)
Supplementary Figure 3
Metacarpal stress-strain index in relation to tibial muscle cross-sectional area in black and white females and males (PNG 252 kb)
Supplementary Figure 4
Mixed model growth curves of metacarpal, radial and tibial bone width against years from peak metacarpal length velocity in black and white females and males (PDF 442 kb)
Supplementary Figure 5
Mixed model growth curves of metacarpal, radial and tibial cortical thickness against years from peak metacarpal length velocity in black and white females and males (PDF 440 kb)
Supplementary Figure 6
Mixed model growth curves of metacarpal, radial and tibial medullary width against years from peak metacarpal length velocity in black and white females and males (PDF 439 kb)
Supplementary Figure 7
Mixed model growth curves of metacarpal, radial and tibial stress-strain index against years from peak metacarpal length velocity in black and white females and males (PDF 448 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Magan, A., Micklesfield, L.K., Nyati, L.H. et al. A longitudinal comparison of appendicular bone growth and markers of strength through adolescence in a South African cohort using radiogrammetry and pQCT. Osteoporos Int 30, 451–460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4761-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4761-9