Abstract
Fracture fixation in severe osteoporotic bone by means of implants that rely on screw anchorage is still a clinical problem. So far, a sufficiently accurate prediction of the holding capacity of screws as a function of local bone morphology has not been obtained. In this study the ultimate pullout loads of screws in the epi-, meta-, and diaphyseal regions of human tibiae were correlated to the cortical thicknesses and cancellous bone mineral densities at the screw axes determined from QCT densitometric data. Stepwise multiple linear regression showed that in regions with cortical thicknesses below 1.5 mm, cancellous density determined the ultimate pullout load (R2=0.85, p<0.001), while in regions with cortices above 1.5 mm, cortical thickness alone significantly influenced the holding capacity of a screw (R2=0.90, p<0.001). The findings of this study provide a basis for a bone morphology-related pre-operative estimation of the holding capacity of screws, which could help to improve their proper application in osteoporotic bone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asnis SE, Ernberg JJ, Bostrom MP, Wright TM, Harrington RM, Tencer A, Peterson M (1996) Cancellous bone screw thread design and holding power. J Orthop Trauma 10:462–469
Bloom RA (1980) A comparative estimation of the combined cortical thickness of various bone sites. Skeletal Radiol 5:167–170
Brown GA, McCarthy T, Bourgeault CA, Callahan DJ (2000) Mechanical performance of standard and cannulated 4.0-mm cancellous bone screws. J Orthop Res 18:307–312
Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D (1996) Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng 118:391–398
DeCoster TA, Heetderks DB, Downey DJ, Ferries JS, Jones W (1990) Optimizing bone screw pullout force. J Orthop Trauma 4:169–174
Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, Lill CA, Kuhn V, Schneider E, Delling G, Muller R (2002) Bone strength at clinically relevant sites displays substantial heterogeneity and is best predicted from site-specific bone densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 17:162–171
Faran KJ, Ichioka N, Trzeciak MA, Han S, Medige J, Moy OJ (1999) Effect of bone quality on the forces generated by compression screws. J Biomech 32:861–864
Frigg R (2001) Locking compression plate (LCP): an osteosynthesis plate based on the dynamic compression plate and the Point Contact Fixator (PC-Fix). Injury 32 (Suppl) 2:63–66
Harnroongroj T, Techataweewan A (1999) Determination of the role of the cancellous bone in generation of screw holding power at metaphysis. Clin Biomech 14:364–366
Jergas M, Schmid G (1999) Conventional radiology of osteoporosis and radiographic absorptiometry. Radiologe 39:174–185
Messmer P, Long G, Suhm N, Regazzoni P, Jacob AL (2001) Volumetric model determination of the tibia based on 2D radiographs using a 2D/3D database. Comput Aided Surg 6:183–194
Pearson J, Ruegsegger P, Dequeker J, Henley M, Bright J, Reeve J, Kalender W, Felsenberg D, Laval-Jeantet AM, Adams JE (1994) European semi-anthropomorphic phantom for the cross-calibration of peripheral bone densitometers: assessment of precision accuracy and stability. Bone Miner 27:109–120
Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Kalender WA (1999) Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Phys Med Biol 44:751–764
Snyder SM, Schneider E (1991) Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography. J Orthop Res 9:422–431
Stromsoe K, Kok WL, Hoiseth A, Alho A (1993) Holding power of the 4.5 mm AO/ASIF cortex screw in cortical bone in relation to bone mineral. Injury 24:656–659
Acknowledgement. The authors gratefully acknowledge Mathys Medical Ltd, Bettlach, Switzerland, for providing the screws for the experiments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seebeck, J., Goldhahn, J., Morlock, M.M. et al. Mechanical behavior of screws in normal and osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16 (Suppl 2), S107–S111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1777-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1777-0