Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient characteristics associated with treatment choice for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) frequently undergo more than one treatment prior to settling on their final strategy. We hypothesize that women who are younger, with worse POP and SUI symptoms will desire and choose surgical treatment.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed over 1 year identifying new patients presenting with POP and/or SUI at a university hospital. Our aim was to determine patient desire for either surgical or conservative treatment, as well as the actual treatment chosen and received after the first visit and 1 year later. To identify predictors of choice, baseline demographic characteristics were obtained.

Results

Of the 203 women who met the inclusion criteria, 44.3 % (90/203) desired surgery and 55.7 % (113/203) desired conservative treatment at their first visit. Women who desired surgery were more likely to be younger (p = 0.003), sexually active (p = 0.001), have more advanced prolapse (p = 0.006), and have more bothersome symptoms (p = 0.05). Of the women who desired surgery at their first visit, 12.2 % (11/90) actually chose conservative treatment. These women were less likely to be insured (p = 0.01). By 1 year, of the women who initially desired and subsequently chose conservative treatment, 26.5 % (30/113) had undergone surgery. The women who changed from conservative to surgical treatment were more likely to be younger (p = 0.01), non-White (p = 0.03), and sexually active (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

In this study, younger, sexually active women were more likely to either opt for surgery initially or to change their treatment plan from conservative to surgical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras RM et al (1994) Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet Gynecol 83:549–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilchrist AS, Campbell W, Steele H, Brazell H, Foote J, Swift S (2013) Outcomes of observation as therapy for pelvic organ prolapse: a study in the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 32(4):383–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J, Matthews C, Conover M, Pate V, Jonsson FM (2014) Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 123(6):1201–1206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan SS, Cheung RY, Yiu KW, Lee LL, Pang AW, Chung TK (2012) Symptoms, quality of life, and factors affecting women’s treatment decisions regarding pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 23(8):1027–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Mayn L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(1):108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER et al (2004) Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellimoottil C, Miller S, Davis M, Miller DC (2015) Insurance expansion and the utilization of inpatient surgery: evidence for a “woodwork” effect? Surg Innov 22(6):588–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Flegal FM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL (2010) Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 307(5):491–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thubert T, Deffieux X, Letouzev V, Hermieu JF (2012) Obesity and urogynecology: a systematic review. Prog Urol 22(8):445–453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmerman CW (2008) Pelvic organ prolapse: basic principles. In: Rock JA, Jones III HW, (eds.) Te Linde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 854–872

    Google Scholar 

  11. Subak LL, Richter HE, Hunskaar S (2009) Obesity and urinary incontinence: epidemiology and clinical research update. J Urol 182(6 Suppl):S2–S7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sitavarin S, Wattanayingcharoenchai R, Manonai J, Sarit-apirak S, Chittacharoen A (2009) The characteristics and satisfaction of the patients using vaginal pessaries. J Med Assoc Thai 92(6):744–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1025–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth J. Geller.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Brief summary

Women who are younger and sexually active are more likely to choose surgery initially or after one year for pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, S.A., Davidson, E.R.W., Bretschneider, C.E. et al. Patient characteristics associated with treatment choice for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 27, 811–816 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2907-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2907-2

Keywords

Navigation