Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in British subjects with overactive bladder: insights into factors associated with dose escalation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of flexible-dose fesoterodine and factors associated with dose escalation in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB).

Methods

In this 12-week, open-label study, 331 adults with OAB symptoms for ≥3 months, ≥8 micturitions and ≥3 urgency episodes per 24 h and who reported at least “some moderate” bladder-related problems were treated with fesoterodine 4 mg once daily for 4 weeks, with the option to escalate to 8 mg for the remaining 8 weeks based on discussion of efficacy and tolerability with the investigator. Factors influencing dose escalation were identified using stepwise logistic regression. Efficacy was assessed via 3-day bladder diaries and patient-reported outcomes.

Results

Of the subjects, 59 % dose escalated at week 4; 93 % of escalators cited insufficient clinical response. The decision to escalate was most often made by the subject (alone or with the investigator). Improvements from baseline were observed in diary and patient-reported outcomes at weeks 4 and 12. Smaller improvements in micturition frequency and worse bladder-related problems at week 4 were significantly associated with increased likelihood of dose escalation; baseline micturition frequency, age, sex, body mass index, antimuscarinic-associated adverse events and OAB symptom duration were not. Non-escalators had greater improvement from baseline to week 4 than escalators; by week 12, improvement was similar among escalators and non-escalators. Fesoterodine was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Treatment with flexible-dose fesoterodine improved bladder diary and patient-reported outcomes. Lower clinical response was related to dose escalation; after escalation, response in escalators approached that of non-escalators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AE:

Adverse event

BMI:

Body mass index

BSW:

Benefit, Satisfaction and Willingness to Continue

CI:

Confidence interval

ICIQ-SF:

International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Short Form

OAB:

Overactive bladder

PPBC:

Patient Perception of Bladder Condition

SAE:

Serious adverse event

SAGA:

Self-Assessment of Goal Achievement

SD:

Standard deviation

TSQ:

Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

UPS:

Urgency Perception Scale

UUI:

Urgency urinary incontinence

References

  1. Milsom I, Irwin DE (2007) A cross-sectional, population-based, multinational study of the prevalence of overactive bladder and lower urinary tract symptoms: results from the EPIC study. Eur Urol Suppl 6:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reeves P, Irwin D, Kelleher C, Milsom I, Kopp Z, Calvert N et al (2006) The current and future burden and cost of overactive bladder in five European countries. Eur Urol 50:1050–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson KE, Chapple CR, Cardozo L, Cruz F, Hashim H, Michel MC et al (2009) Pharmacological treatment of overactive bladder: report from the International Consultation on Incontinence. Curr Opin Urol 19:380–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapple CR, Khullar V, Gabriel Z, Muston D, Bitoun CE, Weinstein D (2008) The effects of antimuscarinic treatments in overactive bladder: an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 54:543–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Novara G, Galfano A, Secco S, D’Elia C, Cavalleri S, Ficarra V et al (2008) A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with antimuscarinic drugs for overactive bladder. Eur Urol 54:740–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Benner JS, Nichol MB, Rovner ES, Jumadilova Z, Alvir J, Hussein M et al (2010) Patient-reported reasons for discontinuing overactive bladder medication. BJU Int 105:1276–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carr LK (2008) Overactive bladder. Can J Urol 15(Suppl 1):32–36; discussion 36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michel MC, Staskin D (2011) Understanding dose titration: overactive bladder treatment with fesoterodine as an example. Eur Urol Suppl 10:8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapple CR, Rosenberg MT, Brenes FJ (2009) Listening to the patient: a flexible approach to the use of antimuscarinic agents in overactive bladder syndrome. BJU Int 104:960–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P, Tubaro A, Haag-Molkenteller C, Forst HT, Massow U et al (2007) Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 52:1204–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK, Forst HT, Haag-Molkenteller C, Massow U et al (2007) Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome. J Urol 178:2488–2494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khullar V, Rovner ES, Dmochowski R, Nitti V, Wang J, Guan Z (2008) Fesoterodine dose response in subjects with overactive bladder syndrome. Urology 71:839–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyndaele JJ, Goldfischer ER, Morrow JD, Gong J, Tseng LJ, Guan Z et al (2009) Effects of flexible-dose fesoterodine on overactive bladder symptoms and treatment satisfaction: an open-label study. Int J Clin Pract 63:560–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dmochowski RR, Peters KM, Morrow JD, Guan Z, Gong J, Sun F et al (2010) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of flexible-dose fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Urology 75:62–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coyne KS, Margolis MK, Hsieh R, Vats V, Chapple CR (2011) Validation of the urinary sensation scale (USS). Neurourol Urodyn 30:360–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Coyne KS, Matza LS, Kopp Z, Abrams P (2006) The validation of the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC): a single-item global measure for patients with overactive bladder. Eur Urol 49:1079–1086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardozo L, Coyne KS, Versi E (2005) Validation of the Urgency Perception Scale. BJU Int 95:591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coyne K, Revicki D, Hunt T, Corey R, Stewart W, Bentkover J et al (2002) Psychometric validation of an overactive bladder symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire: the OAB-q. Qual Life Res 11:563–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S (1997) A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1374–1379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Reese PR, Pleil AM, Okano GJ, Kelleher CJ (2003) Multinational study of reliability and validity of the King’s Health Questionnaire in patients with overactive bladder. Qual Life Res 12:427–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pleil AM, Coyne KS, Reese PR, Jumadilova Z, Rovner ES, Kelleher CJ (2005) The validation of patient-rated global assessments of treatment benefit, satisfaction, and willingness to continue—the BSW. Value Health 8:S25-S34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Piault E, Evans CJ, Espindle D, Kopp Z, Brubaker L, Abrams P (2008) Development and validation of the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction (OAB-S) Questionnaire. Neurourol Urodyn 27:179–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brubaker L, Khullar V, Piault E, Evans CJ, Bavendam T, Beach J et al (2011) Goal attainment scaling in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: development and pilot testing of the Self-Assessment Goal Achievement (SAGA) questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 22:937–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wyndaele JJ, Goldfischer ER, Morrow JD, Gong J, Tseng LJ, Choo MS (2011) Patient-optimized doses of fesoterodine improve bladder symptoms in an open-label, flexible-dose study. BJU Int 107:603–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Staskin D, Khullar V, Michel MC, Morrow JD, Sun F, Guan Z et al (2011) Effects of voluntary dose escalation in a placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trial of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn 30:1480–1485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by Pfizer Ltd. Medical writing assistance was provided by Patricia B. Leinen, Ph.D., and Colin P. Mitchell, Ph.D., from Complete Healthcare Communications, Inc. and was funded by Pfizer Ltd.

Conflicts of interest

LC received funding during the preceding year for research, lecturing, or consultancies from Astellas and Pfizer and has done research consultancy or advisory work for Astellas, Pfizer, Ethicon, TEVA, Merck, and Eli Lilly. TH, JR, and AW have received research monies, honoraria, or consultancy fees from Pfizer, Astellas, Watson Pharma, and Orion Pharma. CEB is an employee of Pfizer France. AD is an employee of Pfizer Ltd. IK was an employee of Pfizer Ltd at the time this study was conducted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Cardozo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardozo, L., Hall, T., Ryan, J. et al. Safety and efficacy of flexible-dose fesoterodine in British subjects with overactive bladder: insights into factors associated with dose escalation. Int Urogynecol J 23, 1581–1590 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1804-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1804-1

Keywords

Navigation