Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative urinary retention following vaginal mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of the study was to assess vaginal mesh procedures and patient characteristics that are associated with postoperative urinary retention (PUR) following pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Methods

The charts of 142 patients who underwent transvaginal reconstructive surgery with mesh were included in the analysis. Primary outcome was the incidence of PUR following surgery with mesh. Patients were grouped according to discharge from the hospital with or without a catheter based on a standardized voiding trial.

Results

Forty-eight patients (34%) developed PUR after surgery. Of those, 30 patients (62.5%) had a combined anterior and posterior repair (p = 0.033). Mean preoperative anterior stage prolapse for patients with PUR compared with no PUR was 2.31 vs. 1.80 (p = 0.002). There was a greater association of PUR among patients with concomitant retropubic slings compared with transobturator slings (OR = 3.6, 95% confidence interval = 1.3–9.8).

Conclusions

A higher preoperative anterior stage prolapse, combined anterior and posterior compartment repairs, and retropubic sling procedures appear to be associated with PUR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CIC:

Clean intermittent catheterization

EBL:

Estimated blood loss

DO:

Detrusor overactivity

PFS:

Pelvic floor surgery

POP:

Pelvic organ prolapse

POP-Q:

Pelvic organ prolapse quantification

PUR:

Postoperative urinary retention

PVR:

Post-void residual volume

QOL:

Quality of life

RP:

Retropubic sling

SLK:

Surgical lift kit

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

TO:

Transobturator sling

TVT:

Tension-free vaginal tape

TVT-O:

Tension-free vaginal tape obturator

UCP:

Urethral closure pressure

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

VLPP:

Valsalva leak point pressure

VT:

Voiding trial

References

  1. Takata H, Berlin B (1971) Postoperative urinary retention. Hartford Hosp Bull 26:118–122

    Google Scholar 

  2. Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak DN, Olsen AL, Thompson PK, Walters MD (2007) Clinical predictors of urinary retention after pelvic reconstructive and stress urinary incontinence surgery. J Reprod Med 52:611–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Karram MM, Walters MD (1999) Urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery, 2nd edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F (2009) Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 110(5):1139–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE (2006) The use of graft materials in vaginal pelvic floor surgery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 92:279–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacquetin B, Cosson M (2009) Complications of vaginal mesh: our experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:893–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simsiman A, Luber K, Menefee S (2006) Vaginal paravaginal repair with porcine dermal reinforcement: correction of advanced anterior vaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195:1832–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M (2002) Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapsed. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):49–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C (2008) Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:787–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kato K, Suzuki S, Yamamoto S, Furuhashi K, Suzuki K, Murase T, Gotoh M (2009) Clinical pathway for tension-free vaginal mesh procedure: evaluation in 300 patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Mar 16(3):314–7

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hakvoort RA, Dijkgraaf MG, Burger MP, Emanuel MH, Roovers JP (2009) Predicting short-term urinary retention after vaginal prolapse surgery. Neurol Urodyn 28(3):225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Iglesia C, Shott S, Fenner DE, Brubaker L (1998) Effect of preoperative voiding mechanism on success rate of autologous rectus fascia suburethral sling procedure. Obstet Gynecol 91(4):577–581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Charalambous S, Touloupidis S, Fatles G, Papatsoris AG, Kalaitzis CH, Giannakopoulos S, Rombis V (2008) Transvaginal vs transobturator approach for synthetic sling placement in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(3):357–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz HP, Foote AJ, Mak HLJ, Wilson PD (2004) TVT and Sparc suburethral slings: a case-control series. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:129–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Krystal M. Hunter, MBA for her contributions to the statistical analyses of data.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Financial support

None.

Disclaimers

Dr. Caraballo and Dr. Holzberg are consultants for Boston Scientific (Natick, MA, USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin J. Steinberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinberg, B.J., Finamore, P.S., Sastry, D.N. et al. Postoperative urinary retention following vaginal mesh procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21, 1491–1498 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1212-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1212-3

Keywords

Navigation