Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moderate weight loss in obese women with urinary incontinence: a prospective longitudinal study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study assessed the effect of moderate weight loss in obese women with urodynamically proven urinary incontinence using the International Consultation on Incontinence recommended outcome measures. Sixty-four incontinent women were offered a weight reduction programme with a target loss of 5–10%. This included a low-calorie diet and exercise. An anti-obesity drug (Orlistat) was offered to those who failed to achieve their target. Forty-two (65%) achieved the target weight loss and had significant reduction in body mass index and girth. Weight loss was associated with significant reduction in pad test loss (median difference, 19 g; 95% confidence interval, 13–28 g; p < 0.001). There was also a clinical and statistically significant improvement in quality of life measures. These results suggest that weight reduction of 5% of initial body weight can improve urinary incontinence severity and its effects on quality of life in obese women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

UI:

urinary incontinence

BMI:

body mass index

QoL:

quality of life

LCD:

low calorie diet

KHQ:

Kings Health Questionnaire

FVC:

frequency volume chart

BIA:

bioelectric impedance analysis

USI:

urodynamic stress incontinence

DOI:

detrusor overactivity incontinence

References

  1. Department of Health (2002) Health Survey for England

  2. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 288:1723–1727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A, Lapita MC, Nelson R, Sillen U et al (2005) Epidemiology of Urinary and faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Third International Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd edn., pp 255–312

  4. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bump RC, Sugerman HJ, Fantl JA, McClish DK (1992) Obesity and lower urinary tract function in women: effect of surgically induced weight loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol 167:392–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deitel M, Stone E, Kassam HA, Wilk EJ, Sutherland DJ (1988) Gynecologic-obstetric changes after loss of massive excess weight following bariatric surgery. J Am Coll Nutr 7:147–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Subak L, Johnson CL, Whitcomb D, Boban J, Brown JS (2002) Does weight loss improve incontinence in moderately obese women? Int Urogynecol J 13:40–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Subak LL, Whitcomb E, Shen H, Saxton J, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS (2005) Weight loss: a novel and effective treatment for urinary incontinence. J Urol 174:190–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgio KL, Richter HE, Clements RH, Redden DT, Goode PS (2007) Changes in urinary and fecal incontinence symptoms with weight loss surgery in morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol 110:1034–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brieger G, Korda A (1992) The effect of obesity on the outcome of successful surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 32:71–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson PD, Berghamans B, Hagen S, Hay-Smith J, Moorre K, Nygaard I et al (2005) Adult Conservative Management. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Third Intenational Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd edn., pp 855–964

  12. Lose G, Fantl JA, Victor A, Walter S, Wells TL, Wyman J, Mattiasson A (2001) Outcome measures for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction Standardization Committee of the International Continence Society. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:981–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Cottenden A, Denis L et al (2005) Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence. Third International Consultation on Incontinence, 3rd edn., pp 1589–1630

  14. Roethlisberger F (1941) The Hawthorne experiments. In: Classics of organizational behaviour. Interstate printers, Danville, IL

  15. Lord J, Thomas R, Fox B, Acharya U, Wilkin T (2006) The effect of metformin on fat distribution and the metabolic syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome-a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BJOG 11:3817–824

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lukaski HC (1987) Methods for assessment of human body composition: traditional and new. Am J Clin Nutrition 46:537–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U (1996) Perineal ultrasound: determination of reliable examination procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7:347–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. King JK, Freeman RM (1998) Is antenatal bladder neck mobility a risk factor for postpartum stress incontinence? BJOG 105:1300–1307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Isherwood PJ, Rane A (2000) Comparative assessment of pelvic floor strength using a perineometer and digital examination. BJOG 107:1007–1011

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Foreyt JP, Goodrick GK (1991) Factors common to successful therapy for the obese patient. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:292–297

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stevens N, Sykes K (1996) Aerobic fitness testing: an update. Occup Health (Lond) 48:436–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Sullivan R, Karantanis E, Stevermuer TL, Allen W, Moore KH (2004) Definition of mild, moderate and severe incontinence on the 24-hour pad test. BJOG 111:859–862

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Armitage P, Berry G (1994) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kelleher CJ, Pleil AM, Reese PR, Burgess SM, Brodish PH (2004) How much is enough and who says so? BJOG 111:605–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization (1997) Consultation on Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. WHO Technical Report Series 894

  26. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Obesity: the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children. Clinical guideline 43

  27. Bidmead J, Cardozo L, McLellan A, Khullar V, Kelleher C (2001) A comparison of the objective and subjective outcomes of colposuspension for stress incontinence in women. BJOG 108:408–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pi-Sunyer FX (1996) A review of long-term studies evaluating the efficacy of weight loss in ameliorating disorders associated with obesity. Clin Ther 18:1006–1035

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lambert DM, Marceau S, Forse RA (2005) Intra-abdominal pressure in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg 15:1225–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lam J, Hartwell S, Jekel J (1994) I prayed real hard, so I know I’ll get in: living with randomization in social research, critically evaluating the role of the randomized experiments. New Dir Progr Eval 63:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wael Auwad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auwad, W., Steggles, P., Bombieri, L. et al. Moderate weight loss in obese women with urinary incontinence: a prospective longitudinal study. Int Urogynecol J 19, 1251–1259 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0616-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0616-9

Keywords

Navigation