Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of smooth muscle in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse—an immunohistochemical and morphometric analysis of the cervical third of the uterosacral ligament

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The uterosacral ligament (USL) is part of the pelvic floor connecting the uterus to the dorsal body wall and stabilizing it. In samples obtained from hysterectomy patients, the smooth muscle component of the cervical third of the USL was studied by smooth muscle actin (SMA) immunohistochemistry as indicator for structural abnormalities and by morphometric determination of nuclear size as measure for the functional state. From a total of 40 patients, 18 were matched according to age, parity, and premenopausal status. Immunohistochemistry showed a granular patchy distribution of SMA in the pelvic organ prolapse (POP) group. In patients with POP, the size of smooth muscle cell nuclei was significantly reduced in comparison to patients without POP (25.45 ± 1.92 μm2 vs 28.87 ± 2.92 μm2, p < 0.05). We conclude that the smooth muscle component of the USL is impaired in POP patients, indicating a possible role of smooth muscle in the pathogenesis of POP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber AM, Richter HE (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 106(3):615–634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF (1999) Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(2 Pt 1):299–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(4):712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89(4):501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, Kahn M, Valley M, Bland D, Wang W, Schaffer J (2005) Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(3):795–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104(5):579–585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kenton K, Sadowski D, Shott S, Brubaker L (1999) A comparison of women with primary and recurrent pelvic prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(6 Pt 1):1415–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. DeLancey JO (1992) Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1717–1724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen L, Ashton-Miller JA, Hsu Y, DeLancey JO (2006) Interaction among apical support, levator ani impairment, and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):324–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritsch H, Hotzinger H (1995) Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, visceral pelvic connective tissue, and its compartments. Clin Anat 8(1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Good MC, Copas PR Jr, Doody MC (1992) Uterine prolapse after laparoscopic uterosacral transection. A case report. J Reprod Med 37(12):995–996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, Ludwikowski B (2004) Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 175:III–IX,1–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gabriel B, Denschlag D, Gobel H, Fittkow C, Werner M, Gitsch G, Watermann D (2005) Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(6):475–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Umek WH, Morgan DM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO (2004) Quantitative analysis of uterosacral ligament origin and insertion points by magnetic resonance imaging. Obstet Gynecol 103(3):447–451

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carley ME, Schaffer J (2000) Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women with Marfan or Ehlers Danlos syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(5):1021–1023

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bai SW, Choe BH, Kim JY, Park KH (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse and connective tissue abnormalities in Korean women. J Reprod Med 47(3):231–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Campbell RM (1950) The anatomy and histology of the sacrouterine ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 59(1):1–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fetzer S, Hillebrecht J, Muschke HE, Tonutti E (1955) Pituitary control of the interstitial cells of the rat ovary quantitatively studied in cell nucleus volume. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 43(4):404–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boguth E, Langendorff H, Tonutti E (1951) Nuclear magnitude as an indication of the functional relation of hypophysis and adrenal cortex; physiologic adaptation reaction and toxic lesions of the cortex due to diphtheria toxin. Med Welt 20(13):408–414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175(1):10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bai SW, Chung DJ, Yoon JM, Shin JS, Kim SK, Park KH (2005) Roles of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53 and p21 in pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:492–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gabriel B, Watermann D, Hancke K, Gitsch G, Werner M, Tempfer C, zur Hausen H (2006) Increased expression of MMP-2 in uterosacral ligaments is associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:478–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boeck P (1989) Azan-Färbung (nach Heidenhain). In: Boeck P (ed) Romeis Mikroskopische Technik. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Munich, pp 501–502

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lehr HA, Mankoff DA, Corwin D, Santeusanio G, Gown AM (1997) Application of photoshop-based image analysis to quantification of hormone receptor expression in breast cancer. J Histochem Cytochem 45(11):1559–1565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GW, Krueger Sullivan L, Schon Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97(6):873–879

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu L, Lang JH, Chen J, Chen J (2005) Morphologic study on levator ani muscle in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(5):401–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Boreham MK, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2001) Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and caldesmon expression in the anterior vaginal wall of women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185(4):944–952

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sobue K, Muramoto Y, Fujita M, Kakiuchi S (1981) Purification of a calmodulin-binding protein from chicken gizzard that interacts with F-actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78(9):5652–5655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dabrowska R, Goch A, Galazkiewicz B, Osinska H (1985) The influence of caldesmon on ATPase activity of the skeletal muscle actomyosin and bundling of actin filaments. Biochim Biophys Acta 842(1):70–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA (2002) Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(1):56–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ozdegirmenci O, Karslioglu Y, Dede S, Karadeniz S, Haberal A, Gunhan O, Celasun B (2005) Smooth muscle fraction of the round ligament in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a computer-based morphometric analysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16(1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thiedemann KU, Drews U (1980) Nuclei in testicular feminization (Tfm) are not activated by intact testosterone receptor complexes: a morphometric study in striated urethral muscle of mosaic mice. Cell Tissue Res 212(1):127–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rogalinska M (2002) Alterations in cell nuclei during apoptosis. Cell Mol Biol Lett 7(4):995–1018

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen B, Wen Y, Polan ML (2004) Elastolytic activity in women with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 23(2):119–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wen Y, Zhao YY, Li S, Polan ML, Chen BH (2007) Differences in mRNA and protein expression of small proteoglycans in vaginal wall tissue from women with and without stress urinary incontinence. Hum Reprod 22(6):1718–1724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Leokardia Macher and Ingrid Epple for the excellent technical support and Matthias Renz for the nuclear measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Drews.

Additional information

Christl Reisenauer and Thomas Shiozawa contributed equally to this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reisenauer, C., Shiozawa, T., Oppitz, M. et al. The role of smooth muscle in the pathogenesis of pelvic organ prolapse—an immunohistochemical and morphometric analysis of the cervical third of the uterosacral ligament. Int Urogynecol J 19, 383–389 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0447-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0447-0

Keywords

Navigation