Skip to main content
Log in

On designing Maxwell CUSUM control chart: an efficient way to monitor failure rates in boring processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ordinary CUSUM chart is based on normality assumption. But in real-life phenomenon such as monitoring of lifetime variable, this assumption is not always valid. Hence, a variant of the CUSUM chart, the VCUSUM chart, has been constructed to monitor small shift in a process that is based on a Maxwell distribution. The performance of the chart has been checked by studying the run length properties and it was found to perform better for small shifts as compared to Shewhart type V chart for Maxwell parameter. Finally, a real-life application is presented to monitor the failure rate of a vertical boring machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery DC, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 7th ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2009

  2. Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41(1/2):100–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1(3):239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Acosta-Mejia C a, Pignatiello JJ, Venkateshwara Rao B (1999) A comparison of control charting procedures for monitoring process dispersion. IIE Trans 31(6):569–579

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ryu J-H, Wan H, Kim S (2010) Optimal design of a CUSUM chart for a mean shift of unknown shift. J Qual Technol 42(3):311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tran KP, Castagliola P, and Celano G (2016) “Monitoring the ratio of population means of a bivariate normal distribution using CUSUM type control charts,”. Stat Pap, pp. 1–27

  7. Ghobadi S, Noghondarian K, Noorossana R, Mirhosseini SMS (2015) Developing a fuzzy multivariate CUSUM control chart to monitor multinomial linguistic quality characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(9–12):1893–1903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanusi RA, Riaz M, Abbas N, Abujiya MR (2016) Using FIR to improve CUSUM charts for monitoring process dispersion. Qual Reliab Eng Int 33(5):1045–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel AL, Wu SM (1971) Determination of a.R.L. and a contour nomogram for cusum charts to control normal mean. Technometrics 13(2):221–230

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiu WK (1974) Economic design of cusum charts for controlling normal means. Journal of Appl Stat 23(3. JSTOR):420–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucas JM, Crosier RB (2000) Fast initial response give your CUSUM quality-control head start. Technometrics 42(1):102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ou Y, Wu Z, Lee KM, Wu K (2013) An adaptive CUSUM chart with single sample size for monitoring process mean and variance. Qual Reliab Eng Int 29(7):1027–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanusi RA, Abbas N, Riaz M (2017) On efficient CUSUM-type location control charts using auxiliary information. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 15(1):87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanusi RA, Abujiya MR, Riaz M, Abbas N (2017) Combined Shewhart CUSUM charts using auxiliary variable. Comput Ind Eng 105:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucas JM, Crosier RB (1982) Robust Cusum: a robustness study for Cusum quality control schemes. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 11(23):2669–2687

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang S, Wu Z (2007) A CUSUM scheme with variable sample sizes for monitoring process shifts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(9–10):977–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiao JR, Helo PT (2008) Optimization design of a CUSUM control chart based on taguchi’s loss function. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35(11–12):1234–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbasi SA, Miller A (2012) On proper choice of variability control chart for normal and non-normal processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int 28(3):279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khaliq QUA, Riaz M, Ahmad S (2016) On designing a new Tukey-EWMA control chart for process monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:1–4, pp. 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vardeman S, ou Ray D (1985) Average run lengths for cusum schemes when observations are exponentially distributed. Technometrics 27(2):145–150

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Celano G, Castagliola P, Trovato E (2012) The economic performance of a CUSUM t control chart for monitoring short production runs. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 9(4):329–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang W, Shu L, Jiang W, Tsui KL (2013) Evaluation of run-length distribution for CUSUM charts under gamma distributions. IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineers) 45(9):981–994

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hossain MP, Omar MH, Riaz M (2017) New V control chart for the Maxwell distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 87(3):594–606

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Morse PM (1962) Thermal physics. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Kazmi SMA, Aslam M, Ali S (2011) A note on the maximum likelihood estimators for the mixture of Maxwell distributions using type-I censored scheme. The Open Statistics and Probability Journal 3:31–35

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishna H, Malik M (2012) Reliability estimation in Maxwell distribution with prograsively type-II censored data. J Stat Comput Simul 82(4):623–641

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Tomer SK, Panwar MS (2015) Estimation procedures for Maxwell distribution under type-I progressive hybrid censoring scheme. J Stat Comput Simul 85(2):339–356

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Weisstein EW, “Maxwell Distribution,”. Wolfram mathworld, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MaxwellDistribution.html. [Accessed: 31-Dec-2017]

  29. Hawkins DM and Olwell DH (1998) Cumulative sum charts and charting for quality improvement

  30. R Core Team, “R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. 2015. URL h ttp,” http://www.R-project.org, 2016

  31. “Boring machine | Encyclopaedia Britannica.”

  32. Majumdar SK (1993) An optimum maintenance strategy for a vertical boring machine system. Operational Research Society of India 30:344–365

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Omar and Dr. Riaz would like to acknowledge research facilities made available to them by King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Mr. Hossain would like thank Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University for research support through grant no. 5921.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pear Hossain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hossain, M.P., Sanusi, R.A., Omar, M.H. et al. On designing Maxwell CUSUM control chart: an efficient way to monitor failure rates in boring processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100, 1923–1930 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2679-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2679-1

Keywords

Navigation