Abstract
Recently, there has been a tremendous impetus on anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), and the double-bundle reconstruction concept has been advocated by many authors. It is, therefore, important to understand how the lengths of the two bundles of the ACL vary during different knee flexion angles as this could influence the angle of graft fixation during surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the change in length of the ACL bundles during different knee flexion angles. Ten subjects with normal knees were evaluated. A high-resolution computer tomography scan was performed, and 3D knee images were obtained. These images were then imported to customized software, and digital length measurement of four virtual bundles (anatomical single bundle, AM, PL and over the top) was evaluated from fixed points on the femur and tibia. Length-versus-flexion curves were drawn, and statistical analysis was performed to evaluate changes in length for each bundle at varying angles of knee flexion (0°, 45°, 90° and 135°). All virtual bundles achieved greatest lengths at full extension. There was a significant difference between the posterolateral bundle length when compared to the other bundles at full extension. There were no significant differences between the lengths of the anteromedial and the over the top single bundles at all angles of knee flexion. Three-dimensional computer tomography can be used to assess the length changes of the virtual anterior cruciate ligament bundles, thereby allowing a better understanding of bundle function in clinical situations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:515–520
Amis AA, Dawkins GP (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:260–267
Arnold MP, Verdonschot N, Van Kampen A (2005) The normal anterior cruciate ligament as a model for tensioning strategies in anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med 33:277–283
Bach JM, Hull ML, Patterson HA (1997) Direct measurement of strain in the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Biomech 30:281–283
Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2008) Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:459–464
Belisle AL, Bicos J, Geaney L et al (2007) Strain pattern comparison of double and single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques with the native anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 23:1210–1217
Bellier G, Christel P, Colombet P, Djian P, Franceschi JP, Sbihi A (2004) Double-stranded hamstring graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 20:890–894
Chhabra A, Starman JS, Ferretti M, Vidal AF, Zantop T, Fu FH (2006) Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2–10
Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225
Ferretti M, Levicoff EA, Macpherson TA, Moreland MS, Cohen M, Fu FH (2007) The fetal anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic and histologic study. Arthroscopy 23:278–283
Gabriel MT, Wong EK, Woo SL, Yagi M, Debski RE (2004) Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotator loads. J Orthop Res 22:85–89
Girgis FG, Marshall JL, Monajem A (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional, and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop 106:216–231
Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S et al (2001) Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 17:801–807
Hara K, Kubo T, Suginoshita T, Shimizu C, Hirasawa Y (2000) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a double bundle. Arthroscopy 16:860–864
Hutchinson MR, Ash SA (2003) Resident’s Ridge: assessing the cortical thickness of the lateral wall and roof of the intercondylar notch. Arthroscopy 19:931–935
Iwahashi T, Shino K, Nakata K et al (2008) Assessment of the “functional length” of the three bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:167–174
Jordan SS, Defrate LE, Nha KW, Papannagiri R, Gill TJ, Li G (2007) The in vivo kinematics of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament during weight bearing knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 35:547–554
Kanamori A, Woo SL-Y, Ma CB et al (2000) The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot-shift test: a human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy 16:633–639
Kurosawa H, Yamakoshi K, Yasuda K, Sasaki T (1991) Simultaneous measurement of changes in length of the cruciate ligaments during knee motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 265:233–240
Li G, Rudy TW, Sakane M, Kanamori A, Ma CB, Woo SL (1999) The importance of quadriceps and hamstring muscle loading on knee kinematics and in situ forces in the ACL. J Biomech 32:395–400
Li G, DeFrate LE, Sun H, Gill TJ (2004) In vivo elongation of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament during knee flexion. Am J Sports Med 32:1415–1420
Li G, Zayontz S, Most E, DeFrate LE, Suggs JF, Rubash HE (2004) In situ forces of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments in high knee flexion: an in vitro investigation. J Orthop Res 22:293–297
Li G, Defrate LE, Rubash HE, Gill TJ (2005) In vivo kinematics of the ACL during weightbearing knee flexion. J Orthop Res 23:340–344
Livesay GA, Fujie H, Kashiwaguchi S, Morrow DA, Fu FH, Woo SL (1995) Determination of the in situ forces and force distribution within the human anterior cruciate ligament. Ann Biomed Eng 23:467–474
Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T et al (2001) Single- versus 2-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17:708–716
Pederzini L, Adriani E, Botticella C, Tosi M (2000) Technical note: double tibial tunnel using quadriceps tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16:E9
Purnell ML, Larson AI, Clancy W (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament insertions on the tibia and femur and their relationships to critical bony landmarks using high-resolution volume-rendering computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 36:2083–2090
Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL, Livesay GA, Li G, Fu FH (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 15:285–293
Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL (2002) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:660–666
Yasuda K, Ichiyama H, Kondo E, Miyatake S, Inoue M, Tanabe Y (2008) An in vivo biomechanical study on the tension-versus-knee flexion angle curves of 2 grafts in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: effects of initial tension and internal tibial rotation. Arthroscopy 24:276–284
Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H et al (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025
Zantop T, Petersen W, Sekiya JK, Musahl V, Fu FH (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomical reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:982–992
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoo, YS., Jeong, WS., Shetty, N.S. et al. Changes in ACL length at different knee flexion angles: an in vivo biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 292–297 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0932-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0932-8