Skip to main content
Log in

Gallenwege

Was will der Chirurg vom Radiologen wissen?

Biliary system

What does the surgeon want to know from the radiologist?

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Klinisches/methodisches Problem

Eine exakte Diagnostik der Gallenwege ist die Voraussetzung für die chirurgische Therapie von Erkrankungen der Gallenwege.

Radiologische Standardverfahren

Die Magnetresonanz-Cholangiopankreatikographie (MRCP) kann zur Planung chirurgischer Eingriffe, für Staging-Untersuchungen von Malignomen sowie zur Darstellung der vaskulären Anatomie im Oberbauch durch die Computertomographie ergänzt werden.

Methodische Innovationen

Die Aussage der MRCP und Computertomographie (CT) kann für ausgewählte Fragestellungen der Transplantationsmedizin und der Leberchirurgie durch eine digitale Aufarbeitung ergänzt werden. Dadurch kann eine virtuelle Planung von Resektionen mit Volumetrie der einzelnen Lebersegmente erarbeitet werden.

Leistungsfähigkeit

Durch eine MRCP erfolgt die exakte Darstellung der intrahepatisch, extrahepatisch sowie im Pankreaskopf lokalisierten Gallenwege sowie deren Pathologien.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

Die radiologische Diagnostik von Malignomen der Gallenwege, benignen biliären Abflusshindernissen, in der Transplantationsmedizin sowie im postoperativen Komplikationsmanagement ist unabdingbare Voraussetzung einer chirurgischen Therapie.

Abstract

Clinical/methodical issue

Exact diagnostic procedures are prerequisite for surgical treatment of bile duct diseases.

Standard radiological methods

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography may be supplemented by computed tomography (CT) for planning surgical interventions, for staging diagnostics in malignancies and for imaging the vascular anatomy in the upper abdomen.

Methodical innovations

Statements from magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and CT may be supplemented via digital workup in selected cases of transplantation medicine and in liver surgery. Thus, a virtual resection planning including volumetry of the individual liver segments can be realized.

Performance

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography provides for exact imaging of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts as well as those situated within the head of the pancreas and their pathologies.

Practical recommendations

Radiological diagnostics of bile duct malignancies, benign outflow obstructions, in transplantation medicine and in postoperative complication management are an indispensable prerequisite in surgical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8
Abb. 9
Abb. 10

Literatur

  1. Huang TL, Cheng YF, Chen CL, Chen TY, Lee TY (1996) Variants of the bile ducts: clinical application in the potential donor of living-related hepatic transplantation. Transplant Proc 28(3):1669–1670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ragab A, Lopez-Soler RI, Oto A, Testa G (2013) Correlation between 3D-MRCP and intra-operative findings in right liver donors. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2012.11.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakamura T, Tanaka K, Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Oike F, Ueda M, Kaihara S, Egawa H, Ozden I, Kobayashi N, Uemoto S (2002) Anatomical variations and surgical strategies in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: lessons from 120 cases. Transplantation 73(12):1896–1903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Varotti G, Gondolesi GE, Goldman J, Wayne M, Florman SS, Schwartz ME, Miller CM, Sukru E (2004) Anatomic variations in right liver living donors. J Am Coll Surg 198(4):577–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JW, Kim TK, Kim KW, Kim AY, Kim PN, Ha HK, Lee MG (2003) Anatomic variation in intrahepatic bile ducts: an analysis of intraoperative cholangiograms in 300 consecutive donors for living donor liver transplantation. Korean J Radiol 4(2):85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma V, Saraswat VA, Baijal SS, Choudhuri G (2008) Anatomic variations in intrahepatic bile ducts in a north Indian population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23(7):e58–e62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05418.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Frilling A, Nadalin S, Broelsch CE, Malago M (2012) Timing and risk factors of hepatectomy in the management of complications following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 16(4):815–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011-1769-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Truant S, Boleslawski E, Lebuffe G, Sergent G, Pruvot FR (2010) Hepatic resection for post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a literature review. HPB (Oxford) 12(5):334–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00172.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bektas H, Kleine M, Tamac A, Klempnauer J, Schrem H (2011) Clinical application of the hanover classification for iatrogenic bile duct lesions. Hpb Surg 2011:612384. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/612384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lau WY, Lai EC (2007) Classification of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 6(5):459–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bismuth H, Majno PE (2001) Biliary strictures: classification based on the principles of surgical treatment. World J Surg 25(10):1241–1244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neuhaus P, Schmidt SC, Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Raakow R, Langrehr JM, Bechstein WO (2000) Classification and treatment of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurg 71(2):166–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart L, Way LW (1995) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg 130(10):1123–1128 (discussion 1129)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, Tabuchi K, Okajima K (1977) Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 134(2):263–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Caroli J, Soupault R, Kossakowski J, Plocker L, Paradowska (1958) Congenital polycystic dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts; attempt at classification. Sem Hop 34(8):488–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moslim MA, Gunasekaran G, Vogt D, Cruise M, Morris-Stiff G (2015) Surgical management of Caroli’s Disease: single center experience and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 19(11):2019–2027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2918-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boberg KM, Lind GE (2011) Primary sclerosing cholangitis and malignancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 25(6):753–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2011.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trauner M, Halilbasic E, Baghdasaryan A, Moustafa T, Krones E, Fickert P, Hofer H, Penner E (2012) Primary sclerosing cholangitis: new approaches to diagnosis, surveillance and treatment. Dig Dis 30(Suppl 1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hilscher MB, Tabibian JH, Carey EJ, Gostout CJ, Lindor KD (2018) Dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a multicenter survey of clinical definitions and practices. Int Hepatol Commun 2(7):836–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chapman RW, Williamson KD (2017) Are dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis a risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma? Curr Hepatol Rep 16(2):124–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-017-0341-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bjornsson E, Olsson R, Bergquist A, Lindgren S, Braden B, Chapman RW, Boberg KM, Angulo P (2008) The natural history of small-duct primary sclerosing cholangitis. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol 134(4):975–980. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Braunwarth E, Stattner S, Fodor M, Cardini B, Resch T, Oberhuber R, Putzer D, Bale R, Maglione M, Margreiter C, Schneeberger S, Ofner D, Primavesi F (2018) Surgical techniques and strategies for the treatment of primary liver tumours: hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Eur Surg 50(3):100–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-018-0537-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T (1992) Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215(1):31–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Deoliveira ML, Schulick RD, Nimura Y, Rosen C, Gores G, Neuhaus P, Clavien PA (2011) New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatology 53(4):1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, Heaton N, Karani J, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Tait P, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thillainayagam AV, Thomas HC, Wasan H, British Society of G (2012) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut 61(12):1657–1669. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura N, Nishida S, Neff GR, Vaidya A, Levi DM, Kato T, Ruiz P, Tzakis AG, Madariaga JR (2005) Intrahepatic biliary strictures without hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation: an analysis of 1,113 liver transplantations at a single center. Transplantation 79(4):427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bauschke A, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Malessa C, Rohland O, Settmacher U (2017) Influence of bile duct anatomy on biliary complications in hepatic right lobe living donors. Chirurg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-017-0514-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lo CM (2016) Expanding living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 22(S1):37–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee SG (2015) A complete treatment of adult living donor liver transplantation: a review of surgical technique and current challenges to expand indication of patients. Am J Transplant 15(1):17–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schroeder T, Malago M, Debatin JF, Goyen M, Nadalin S, Ruehm SG (2005) „All-in-one“ imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl 11(7):776–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown RS Jr., Smith AR, Dew MA, Gillespie BW, Hill-Callahan P, Ladner DP (2014) Predictors of donor follow-up after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplant 20(8):967–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23912

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bauschke.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

A. Bauschke gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bauschke, A. Gallenwege. Radiologe 59, 300–305 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-019-0502-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-019-0502-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation